Training Program for PEG Caregivers: A Structured Intervention Study (PEG-EDU)

August 29, 2025 updated by: Sevilay Senol Celik, Koç University

Effectiveness of Education and Mobile Application for Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Care

This study aims to develop and evaluate a structured education program and a mobile application to support caregivers of patients receiving enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The intervention focuses on improving caregivers' knowledge, care practices, and perceived burden. The study will be conducted in three phases: a needs assessment, development of the education and digital support modules, and implementation of the intervention. Quantitative and qualitative data will be collected to evaluate the impact of the intervention. The results are expected to contribute to the improvement of home PEG care quality and the empowerment of caregivers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed to improve the caregiving practices of individuals who are responsible for patients receiving long-term enteral nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The study is structured in three phases: (1) identification of caregivers' needs through descriptive and qualitative assessments, (2) development of a theory-based structured education program and a mobile application, and (3) implementation and evaluation of the intervention using a mixed-methods design.

In the first phase, caregivers' knowledge gaps, challenges, and educational needs will be identified through a needs assessment that includes questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. In the second phase, based on the findings of the initial assessment and supported by current clinical guidelines and national health policies, a structured education program and a digital support tool (mobile app) will be developed. The educational content will cover PEG fundamentals, stoma care, tube cleaning, enteral feeding, medication administration via PEG, complication management, and psychosocial support. Educational materials will include videos, animations, texts, and interactive quizzes, and the mobile app will allow asynchronous learning and monitoring.

In the third phase, the education program will be delivered through in-person theoretical and practical sessions, followed by the use of the mobile application. Outcome measures will include caregivers' knowledge level, caregiving burden, self-reported practices, and satisfaction with the intervention. Quantitative data will be collected using validated measurement tools, and qualitative feedback will be gathered to provide a deeper understanding of the intervention's impact. This study is expected to support the standardization of home PEG care and enhance caregiver capacity through sustainable and scalable educational interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Willingness to participate voluntarily in the study
  • No communication barriers
  • Ability to use a smartphone
  • No diagnosed psychiatric disorder
  • Providing care to a patient aged 18 or older who is scheduled to undergo PEG placement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Discharge from hospital or death of the patient during the study period
  • Being under 18 years old
  • Illiteracy of the caregiver

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Caregiver Training Program
Caregivers receive a structured education program and mobile application support based on Bandura's Social Learning Theory.
The intervention consists of a two-month structured education program including two face-to-face sessions and a mobile application. The training content covers PEG care, stoma and tube management, enteral nutrition, drug administration via tube, and troubleshooting complications.
No Intervention: Routine Care
Caregivers receive the institution's standard information and support practices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Caregiver Knowledge Level
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
The effect of the training program and mobile application on the change in the knowledge level of caregivers (Data collection form to be used: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Care Knowledge Level Assessment Form). The form includes 28 items addressing PEG care (e.g., stoma care, tube maintenance, feeding, medication). Each correct answer scores 1 point. The total score ranges from 0 (lowest) to 28 (highest). Higher scores indicate greater knowledge.
Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of the Cleaning Brush
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
Whether the cleaning brush is effective in maintaining PEG tubes and users' satisfaction with this product (Form to be used: Cleaning Brush Usage Evaluation Form).
Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
PEG Problems
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
The impact of the training program and mobile app on the frequency and severity of PEG-related problems (blockage, infection, leakage, etc.) (Data collection form to be used: PEG Problems Monitoring Form). The form includes 12 predefined problem types (e.g., infection, leakage, dislodgement, constipation), and allows for open-ended documentation of additional complications. Each problem is recorded by date, severity (mild/moderate/severe), management approach, and outcome. Problems will be tracked monthly over a 2-month period. Higher number of recorded complications indicates a worse outcome.
Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
Caregiver Burden Perception:
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
The impact of the training program and mobile app on caregivers' perception of caregiver burden (Scale to be used: Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale). The Caregiver Burden Scale, a 21-item scale measuring the frequency of burden-related experiences. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). Additionally, general caregiver stress is measured on a visual analogue scale from 0 (no stress) to 10 (extreme stress). Higher scores indicate a greater caregiver burden.
Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
Training and Mobile Application Satisfaction:
Time Frame: Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention
The user-friendliness of the training program and mobile application, and the level of satisfaction (Forms to be used: Training Evaluation Form, Mobile Application Evaluation Form, and Willingness to Use Mobile Application Scale). Caregiver satisfaction was assessed with the Training Evaluation Form (9 Likert-type items, score range: 9-45). Mobile app usability and content were explored via the Mobile Application Evaluation Form, including open-ended qualitative items. Willingness to use the app was measured by the Mobile Application Use Willingness Scale (6 items, 7-point Likert scale, total score: 6-42). Higher scores reflect greater satisfaction or willingness. Data were collected two months post-intervention.
Baseline and monthly assessments during 2-month intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that supports the findings of this study will be available upon reasonable request from researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents (Study Protocol, SAP) will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the final results and will remain accessible for 3 years. Access will be granted upon reasonable request to the principal investigator.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will be able to access de-identified individual participant data (IPD), the study protocol, and the statistical analysis plan. Requests should be submitted to the principal investigator via institutional email and will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Data access will be granted through a secure institutional repository.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caregiver Burden

Clinical Trials on Caregiver Training Program

Subscribe