Cognitive and Metacognitive Evaluation in VR-Based Avatar Therapy for Psychosis (Meta-VR-AVATAR)

August 22, 2025 updated by: Susana Ochoa, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu

Evaluation of Cognitive, Metacognitive, Social Cognition and Trauma Related-Variables in Patients With Psychosis Receiving VR-Based Avatar Therapy

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between cognitive, metacognitive and social cognition variables in patients with psychosis undergoing VR-based Avatar Therapy for the treatment of auditory hallucinations. In addition to the primary intervention, participants will be assessed using validated tools for emotion recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, neurocognition, and metacognition. The study also explores the potential role of trauma as a predisposing factor. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), intervention period (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy follow-up (week 24). By investigating these variables, this study seeks to better understand their impact on treatment outcomes and contribute to the development of personalized therapeutic approaches.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This interventional study investigates the impact of cognitive, metacognitive, and social cognition variables on the outcomes of VR-based Avatar Therapy for auditory hallucinations in patients with psychosis. Participants will be assessed at four key time points: screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), during the intervention (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy (week 24).

The intervention consists of 7 individual VR-based Avatar Therapy sessions delivered over 12 weeks. The therapy uses virtual reality to externalize and reframe distressing auditory hallucinations, helping participants develop more adaptive responses.

In addition to evaluating the therapy's effectiveness, the study incorporates validated tools to measure:

Social Cognition: Emotional recognition (Test de Reconocimiento Emocional), attributional style (AIHQ), theory of mind (Hinting Task), and social perception (SFRT-2).

Metacognition: Insight and cognitive monitoring using the BCIS and CBQ. Cognition: Neuropsychological functions, including attention, flexibility, and memory (SCIP, Stroop, TMT, and Vocabulary WAIS).

Trauma as a predisposing factor: Using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).

By examining these variables, the study aims to deepen the understanding of their influence on treatment outcomes and inform the development of personalized therapeutic approaches for psychosis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Catalonia
      • Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain, 08950
        • Recruiting
        • Fundació Sant Joan de Déu - Unitat de Recerca del Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Susana Ochoa, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Luciana Diaz-Cutraro, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marina Peniza-Soriano, Master degree

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

**Inclusion Criteria:**

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder according to DSM-5 criteria.
  • Experience of persistent auditory hallucinations for at least 3 months (PANSS hallucination score ≥ 3).
  • Stable medication dosage for at least 4 weeks prior to recruitment.
  • Fluent in the spoken language of the study site (Spanish).
  • Able to provide informed consent.
  • Regular psychiatric follow-up care.

**Exclusion Criteria:**

  • Inability to identify a dominant voice for Avatar Therapy intervention.
  • Intellectual disability based on medical history.
  • Active substance abuse.
  • Central nervous system injury or neurological disorders affecting cognitive performance.
  • Severe visual impairment that precludes the use of VR technology.
  • Aversion to virtual reality or prior experience of simulator sickness.
  • Current suicidal ideation or risk.
  • Lack of cooperation or inability to comply with study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments

Participants will receive VR-based Avatar Therapy over a 12-week intervention period, consisting of 7 individual therapy sessions. This intervention is designed to externalize and reframe distressing auditory hallucinations using virtual reality.

In addition to the standard therapy, participants will undergo comprehensive assessments of cognition, metacognition, and social cognition at screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), during the intervention (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy (week 24). These measures will evaluate emotional recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, and trauma history, aiming to explore their role in treatment outcomes.

VR-Based Avatar Therapy is a 12-week intervention designed to help patients with psychosis manage distressing auditory hallucinations. The therapy consists of 7 individual sessions using virtual reality (VR) technology to externalize the auditory hallucinations, allowing patients to interact with a computer-generated avatar representing their dominant voice.

In addition to standard therapy, participants will undergo assessments of cognition, metacognition, and social cognition to explore their impact on treatment outcomes. These assessments include measures of emotion recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, and trauma history. Sessions are conducted using VR headsets and noise-canceling headphones to enhance immersion, and patients receive ongoing therapeutic guidance throughout the process.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Emotion Recognition Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in participants' ability to recognize basic emotions using the Faces Test. Score range: 0-20; higher scores = better emotion recognition.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Executive Functioning Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24.
Change in Executive Functioning Score Executive functioning assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Outcomes include number of categories completed (0-6; higher = better) and number of perseverative errors (no fixed maximum; lower = better). The task ends when the participant completes 6 categories or after all 128 cards are placed.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24.
Change in Attributional Style Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Attributional style in ambiguous social situations assessed with the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ). Score range: 0-100; higher scores = greater hostile attribution/conviction.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Theory of Mind Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Ability to infer others' intentions measured by the Hinting Task. Score range: 0-6; higher scores = better Theory of Mind.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Metacognition Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Cognitive insight measured by the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS): Self-reflectiveness (0-27; higher = better) and Self-certainty (0-21; higher = worse).
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Mental flexibility assessed with the Trail Making Test, Part B. Outcome: time in seconds (maximum 300 seconds); lower times = better performance.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Global Cognitive Performance Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Global cognition assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP). Total score range: 0-75; higher = better cognitive performance.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Working Memory Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Working memory assessed by the WAIS-IV Digit Span. Scaled score range: 1-19; higher scores = better performance.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Childhood Trauma Exposure (Baseline moderator)
Time Frame: Week 0 (one-time measure).
Childhood trauma at baseline measured with the CTQ-SF. Total score range: 25-125; higher = greater trauma exposure.
Week 0 (one-time measure).
Change in Verbal Skills Score
Time Frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Verbal ability assessed by WAIS-IV Vocabulary. Scaled score range: 1-19; higher scores = better verbal ability.
Week 0, Week 12, Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon reasonable request, after publication of primary results, and subject to approval by the research ethics committee and data protection regulations.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Anonymized IPD and supporting documents will be made available after publication of the main study results and for a minimum period of 5 years, starting approximately 12 months after study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic or healthcare institutions may request access to anonymized IPD and supporting documents for independent verification or secondary analysis. Requests will be reviewed by the sponsor and must include a data-sharing agreement and ethics approval. Access will be provided through a secure institutional platform.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia Disorders

Clinical Trials on VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments

3
Subscribe