Randomization for the Identification of Best Treatment Intensity for Less Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myeloid Neoplasms

June 10, 2026 updated by: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Impact of Treatment Intensity on Survival, Quality of Life, and Resource Utilization in Medically Less Fit Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms: A Randomized Pilot Study

This clinical trial studies whether less fit adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myeloid neoplasms are willing to let a computer program decide (randomization) whether they receive lower- or higher-intensity chemotherapy. Historically, treatment decision-making for patients with AML or myeloid neoplasms has divided patients into two categories, with patients considered fit receiving intensive "curative" chemotherapy, and patients considered unfit, such as older patients with a higher risk of early death from therapy, receiving non-intensive "palliative" therapy or no therapy. With the introduction of new treatment agents, it has become difficult to determine the difference between intensive and non-intensive therapy, especially for patients considered unfit for whom treatment-related side effects remain a concern. Treatment intensity is best identified through randomized trials but often patients are unwilling to undergo randomization due to preset beliefs. However, with improved supportive care and the awareness that new treatment agents may have similar risks as intensive therapy, it may be possible that more patients are willing to be randomized. This may help identify the best treatment intensity for less fit adults with AML or myeloid neoplasms, which may improve outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

OUTLINE:

This pilot umbrella trial will explore the feasibility of randomizing patients to higher or lower intensity treatment regimens.

The exact treatment regimens given will be at the discretion of the treating physician and will be provided either as standard of care or following enrollment on a subsequent treatment trial.

Patients and physicians indicate willingness to randomize, those willing are randomized to 1 of 2 arms, those unwilling choose arm III or IV.

ARM I: Patients receive standard of care (SOC) or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as seven days of cytarabine in combination with three days of anthracycline (7+3 regimen) at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM II: Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than five days of cytarabine in combination with two days of anthracycline (5+2 regimen) at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM III: Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

ARM IV: Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Additionally, all patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for up to 24 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 206-606-4643
  • Email: jappelb@uw.edu

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98109
        • Recruiting
        • Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: 206-606-4643
          • Email: jappelb@uw.edu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of high grade myeloid neoplasm (> 10% blasts in blood or marrow), other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) according to the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) classification. Patients with acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage are eligible
  • The use of cytoreductive therapy before treatment is permitted. Patients with symptoms/signs of leukostasis, white blood cell (WBC) > 100,000/μL, or acute symptoms that in the opinion of the treating physician are likely related to their high-grade myeloid neoplasm may receive up to 2 doses of cytarabine (up to 500 mg/m^2 each) prior to study day 1
  • Patients may have received treatment for antecedent low-grade myeloid neoplasm (< 10% myeloid blasts on blood or bone marrow)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 3 (for patients aged < 75 years) or ECOG performance status of 0 - 2 (for patients aged ≥ 75 years)
  • The presence of one or more of the following criteria for 'unfitness'. (Patients without respiratory symptoms at rest are eligible and should only complete spirometry/diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO] measurements as clinically indicated):

    • ECOG Performance Status of 2 or 3
    • Cardiac history of congestive heart failure (CHF) requiring treatment or ejection fraction ≤ 50% or chronic stable angina
    • Documented DLCO ≤ 65% or forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ≤ 65%; or dyspnea at rest, or requiring supplemental oxygen
    • Creatinine clearance ≥ 30 mL/min to < 45 ml/min
    • Moderate hepatic impairment with total bilirubin > 1.5 to ≤ 3.0 × upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Any other comorbidity that the physician judges to be incompatible with intensive chemotherapy
  • Adequate cardiac function:

    • Patients aged ≤ 60 years without a history of cardiac disease or evidence of heart failure are eligible if they also exhibit the following:

      • Chest x-ray (CXR) without evidence of moderate or severe pulmonary edema or pleural effusion, and a normal cardio-mediastinal silhouette
      • Electrocardiogram (ECG) without evidence of atrial or ventricular chamber enlargement
      • Note that patients with either abnormal CXR or ECG should have a structural heart assessment (echocardiogram, multigated acquisition scan [MUGA] or similar) and are eligible if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40% and the abnormalities in the CXR/ECG do not preclude safe administration of intensive chemotherapy
    • Patients with a documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 40%, assessed within 3 months prior to registration, e.g. by MUGA scan or echocardiography, or another appropriate diagnostic modality are eligible
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3x ULN, unless judged due to leukemic organ involvement
  • Total bilirubin ≤ 3 x ULN unless judged due to leukemic organ involvement, Gilbert's syndrome, or hemolysis
  • Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception beginning at the signing of the consent until at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study drug
  • HIV-infected patients on effective anti-retroviral therapy with undetectable viral load within 6 months are eligible for this trial
  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known hypersensitivity to cytarabine, anthracycline, hypomethylating agents, or venetoclax
  • Cardiovascular disability status of New York Heart Association class ≥ 2. Class 2 is defined as cardiac disease in which patients are comfortable at rest but ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitations, dyspnea, or anginal pain
  • Subject exhibits evidence of other clinically significant uncontrolled systemic infection requiring therapy (viral, bacterial or fungal)
  • Concomitant illness associated with a likely survival of < 1 year
  • Active pregnancy or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (randomized higher-intensity therapy)
Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
Ancillary studies
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Ancillary studies
Undergo bone marrow assessment
Other Names:
  • Collection, Bone Marrow
Experimental: Arm II (randomized lower-intensity therapy)
Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen at the discretion of the treating physician on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
Ancillary studies
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Ancillary studies
Undergo bone marrow assessment
Other Names:
  • Collection, Bone Marrow
Active Comparator: Arm III (patient choice higher-intensity therapy)
Patients receive SOC or investigational higher-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is at least as intense as 7+3 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
Ancillary studies
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Ancillary studies
Undergo bone marrow assessment
Other Names:
  • Collection, Bone Marrow
Active Comparator: Arm IV (patient choice lower-intensity therapy)
Patients receive SOC or investigational lower-intensity therapy on a subsequent treatment trial that is less intense than 5+2 regimen according to physician/patient preference on study. Treatment continues in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Additionally, patients undergo blood sample collection and bone marrow assessments on study.
Ancillary studies
Undergo blood sample collection
Other Names:
  • Biological Sample Collection
  • Biospecimen Collected
  • Specimen Collection
Ancillary studies
Undergo bone marrow assessment
Other Names:
  • Collection, Bone Marrow

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Willingness to randomize (Feasibility)
Time Frame: At baseline
Patient willingness to randomize will be indicated on the survey instrument Patient Preference for Treatment Assignment Survey. Patients who select the box indicating "I am willing to let a coin flip (i.e. computer program) decide whether I receive lower- or higher-intensity chemotherapy" will be considered willing to randomize. Will consider randomization feasible (i.e. a subsequent, larger study would be designed as a randomized trial) if the true proportion of patients willing to be randomized is 60% or higher.
At baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacob Appelbaum, MD, PhD, Fred Hutch/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe