A Brief Psychological Intervention to Improve Emotional Well-Being During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer

February 17, 2026 updated by: Jordan Cloyd, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Testing the Feasibility of Incorporating Psychosocial Oncology During Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer

This clinical trial tests how well a psychosocial oncology intervention during neoadjuvant therapy works for patients with pancreatic cancer that has not spread to other parts of the body (localized). Chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy is often recommended prior to surgeryf or patients with pancreatic cancer; this is known as neoadjuvant therapy (NT). The primary advantages of NT include: reducing the size of the cancer mass and/or reducing the spread of cancer, to improve the likelihood of getting all the cancer during surgery, and because receiving chemotherapy after pancreas surgery can be challenging. Other research has shown that NT can lead to improved survival and a lower rate of the cancer returning. Despite these positive effects, NT can be associated with significant physical and emotional side effects. To prepare patients for future surgery and maintain health during chemotherapy and/or radiation, prehabilitation is often recommended. This can include nutritional and physical therapy to help with physical health. An oncology (cancer) psychosocial intervention during NT may be feasible and helpful to patients with localized pancreatic cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test the feasibility and acceptability of incorporating a psychosocial oncology intervention for patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection.

II. To measure the preliminary efficacy of psychosocial oncology on quality of life and stress/anxiety.

OUTLINE:

Patients participate in a psychosocial oncology intervention consisting of meeting with a psychologist via telehealth sessions over 40 minutes once a week for 4 weeks on study. Patients also receive standard physical therapy and nutritional therapy referrals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Recruiting
        • Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jordan M. Cloyd, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥ 18 years of age
  • Patient:

    • Newly diagnosed patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presenting to Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center-Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSUMC-CCC)
    • Plans to initiate neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection
    • Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) and/or surgery may occur at another facility

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prisoners
  • Persons unable to provide consent
  • Patients unlikely to undergo surgical resection following NT based on anatomical or performance status considerations
  • Confirmed or presumed metastatic disease
  • Already received ≥ 2 cycles of chemotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Services Research (psychosocial care)
Patients participate in a psychosocial oncology intervention consisting of meeting with a psychologist via telehealth sessions over 40 minutes once a week for 4 weeks on study. Patients also attend standard physical therapy and nutritional therapy appointments.
Ancillary studies
Ancillary studies
Attend nutritional appointments
Other Names:
  • Medical Nutrition Therapy
  • nutrition therapy
Attend physical therapy appointments
Other Names:
  • PT
  • Physiatric Procedure
  • Physical Medicine Procedure
  • Physical Therapeutics
  • Physical Therapy Procedure
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physiotherapy Procedure
Receive psychosocial care
Other Names:
  • Psychosocial Support

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility and acceptability of the psychosocial oncology intervention
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be defined as the proportion of enrolled patients who complete the intervention and report that it was acceptable. Will define the incorporation of psychosocial oncology into prehab as feasible and acceptable if >= 70% of enrolled participants agree.
Up to 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in mood for patients with hepatobiliary cancer
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS is a 14-item instrument used to measure anxiety and depression in medically ill patients frequently used to identify depression in cancer patients. Scores are totaled for both depression and anxiety symptoms and range from 0 to 21 with a higher score indicating worse symptoms. The data will be presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Differences will be assessed using linear mixed models accounting for within-subject correlations and individual differences.
Up to 1 year
Changes in worry for patients with hepatobiliary cancer
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be assessed using the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ). The PSWQ is a 20-item measure of worry. Scores range from 16 to 80 with higher scores indicative of higher levels of worry. The data will be presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Differences will be assessed using linear mixed models accounting for within-subject correlations and individual differences.
Up to 1 year
Changes in health-related quality of life for patients with hepatobiliary cancer
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). FACT-G. (FACT-G) is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of health related quality of life(HRQOL) in cancer patients: Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being.. Respondents use a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores reflecting a better quality of life or fewer symptoms. The data will be presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Differences will be assessed using linear mixed models accounting for within-subject correlations and individual differences.
Up to 1 year
Changes in uncertainty for patients with hepatobiliary cancer
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
Will be assessed using the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12) which Measures a component of worry and anxiety associated with discomfort due to the possibility of future events. Respondents use a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores reflecting a higher intolerance of uncertainty in patients. The data will be presented as mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) as appropriate. Differences will be assessed using linear mixed models accounting for within-subject correlations and individual differences.
Up to 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jordan M Cloyd, MD, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage 0 Pancreatic Cancer AJCC v8

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe