Evaluation of the Survival of Fissure Sealants Applied With Different Pretreatment Methods on Permanent First Molars: A One-Year Follow-Up

August 21, 2025 updated by: Handan Vural

Objective:

This study aims to evaluate the effect of two different pretreatment protocols-enamel deproteinization and bonding agent application-on the one-year survival of fissure sealants applied to permanent first molars in children.

Background:

Dental caries is a preventable yet highly prevalent multifactorial disease. Deep pits and fissures are particularly susceptible to caries development, especially in newly erupted molars. Although fissure sealants are considered one of the most effective preventive methods, their clinical success is largely dependent on long-term retention. Contamination of etched enamel surfaces with saliva or gingival fluid is a primary cause of sealant failure. To improve sealant adhesion, several pretreatment methods have been suggested, including bonding agents and enamel deproteinization.

Methods:

This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on healthy children aged 7-14 years. Each child contributed at least three permanent first molars to the study, randomly assigned to one of three groups:

Group A - Acid etching + sealant; Group B - Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant; Group C - Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months using visual and tactile methods. Sealant retention, caries incidence, and marginal discoloration were recorded based on standardized criteria.

Results & Conclusion:

This study seeks to clarify whether bonding agent or deproteinization pretreatment significantly improves sealant retention and reduces caries incidence compared to the conventional approach. Findings may contribute to defining the most effective clinical protocol for fissure sealant application, ultimately enhancing caries prevention and long-term treatment success in pediatric dental care.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Malatya
      • Battalgazi, Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye), 44200
        • Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children aged 8-15 years.
  • Fully erupted or completely impacted teeth that are clinically and radiographically confirmed to be caries-free or present with demineralized fissures scored as ICDAS 1-2.
  • Children demonstrating cooperative behavior, with a Frankl Behavior Rating Scale score of 3 or 4.
  • Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) score ≤ 3
  • Written informed consent obtained from the parent or legal guardian.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Partially erupted second permanent molars
  • Teeth presenting with severe hypoplasia, hypomineralization, extensive restorations, or cavitated carious lesions.
  • History of systemic disease or long-term medication use.
  • Known allergy to resin-based or glass ionomer materials.
  • Presence of parafunctional habits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A: Acid etching + sealant
Sealant application is a preventive conservative approach involving the introduction of sealants into the pits and fissures of caries prone teeth; this sealant then bonds to the tooth micromechanically, providing a physical barrier that keeps bacteria away from their source of nutrients. Acid pretreatment of the enamel to enhance retention is considered a standard procedure prior to the application of resin-based fissure sealants. Currently, the most commonly used phosphoric acid concentrations are 35% and 37%.
Etching: After polishing all teeth included in the study with a polishing brush, Vococid (Voca, Germany) etching gel will be applied to the surface and left for 15 seconds, then rinsed and dried.
After completing the pretreatment steps for all groups, Grandio Seal (Voco GmbH, Germany) will be applied to the pits and fissures on the tooth surface and light-cured for 20 seconds. The procedure will be completed after checking the surface.
Active Comparator: Group B: Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant
The use of phosphoric acid is a well-accepted, conventional method used to create micro-porosities, which are the key in providing sealant retention. However, organic remnants as well as fissure morphology and aprismatic enamel structure can decrease etching ability and thus prevent adequate adhesion.Conventional phosphoric acid can only demineralize the inorganic component of enamel and cannot completely remove the protein content within the enamel. Some proteins are also embedded within the enamel crystals. The inadequate penetration of resin into enamel may also result from the Type 3 etching pattern observed after conventional etching. Studies have shown that after using sodium hypochlorite to remove enamel proteins, Type 1 and Type 2 etching patterns are more frequently observed. The literature indicates that the enamel deproteinization technique with sodium hypochlorite is an effective method for removing organic material from the occlusal enamel surfaces of teeth.
Etching: After polishing all teeth included in the study with a polishing brush, Vococid (Voca, Germany) etching gel will be applied to the surface and left for 15 seconds, then rinsed and dried.
After completing the pretreatment steps for all groups, Grandio Seal (Voco GmbH, Germany) will be applied to the pits and fissures on the tooth surface and light-cured for 20 seconds. The procedure will be completed after checking the surface.
The teeth randomly assigned to Group B will receive 5.25% NaOCl applied with a sterile cotton pellet for 60 seconds after acid etching, followed by rinsing and drying.
Active Comparator: Group C: Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant
Various methods for preparing fissures, such as pumice prophylaxis, bonding agents, lasers, air abrasion, and sodium hypochlorite deproteinization, have been recommended to improve sealant retention The use of adhesive systems prior to fissure sealant application had a positive effect on increasing penetration and improving the retention rate. It also appears that the use of bonding-agents that involve a separate acid-etching step (fourth and fifth generations) provides better sealant retention than self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generations).
Etching: After polishing all teeth included in the study with a polishing brush, Vococid (Voca, Germany) etching gel will be applied to the surface and left for 15 seconds, then rinsed and dried.
After completing the pretreatment steps for all groups, Grandio Seal (Voco GmbH, Germany) will be applied to the pits and fissures on the tooth surface and light-cured for 20 seconds. The procedure will be completed after checking the surface.
The teeth randomly assigned to Group C will receive Futurabond® M+ (Voco, Germany) applied with a brush following acid etching. After gently drying with air for 5 seconds, the bonding step will be completed by light-curing for 10 seconds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Simonsen Criteria
Time Frame: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
Score 0 Fissure sealant is completely in the mouth and there is no new caries. Score 1 Partial loss of fissure sealant, no new caries. Score 2 Partial loss of fissure sealant and new caries. Score 3 Complete loss of fissure sealant, no new caries. Score 4 Complete loss of fissure sealant and new caries
Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
Edge Integrity Evaluation Criteria
Time Frame: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment
0: The fissure sealant and tooth surface are intact and cannot be distinguished with a probe. 1: The edges of the fissure sealants can be distinguished with a probe. 2: There is a gap along the edge of the fissure sealant and deep cracks reaching the central fossa
Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment
Marginal Coloration Evaluation Criteria
Time Frame: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
0 No color change between fissure sealant and tooth. 1:Color change in only one area. 2:Color change in many areas. 3:Severe color change indicating leakage.
Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
Anatomical Form Evaluation Criteria
Time Frame: Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.
0 Consistent with and continuous with occlusal form and structure. 1 Change in anatomical form but all pits and fissures covered. 2a Partial loss of one or two pits or fissures but no need to repair or replace fissure sealant. 2b Partial loss of pits and fissures, fissure sealant needs to be replaced or repaired. 3 Loss of all pits and fissures. 7 Partial loss due to occlusion 9 Bleb not connected to margins
Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: handan vural, Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 7706

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD used in the results publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 6 months and ending 1 years after the publication of results

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to individual participant data (IPD) and supporting materials will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. The following details apply:

Who can access the data: Qualified academic researchers with a valid scientific purpose.

What can be accessed: De-identified IPD, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent forms, and ethics approval documents.

How to access: Interested researchers must submit a written request, including a brief research proposal and documentation of ethics committee approval. Requests should be sent to the corresponding author via email. Data sharing will be conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and applicable data protection regulations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fissure Sealant

Subscribe