Comparison of PeDiAC and the Intubation Difficulty Scale in Pediatric Patients Intubated With Videolaryngoscopy (VIDEOPED)

March 17, 2026 updated by: Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Comparison of the PeDiAC Score and Intubation Difficulty Scale in Pediatric Patients Aged 0-5 Years Undergoing Tracheal Intubation With Videolaryngoscopy

This prospective observational study aims to compare the effectiveness of the Paediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification (PeDiAC) and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) in evaluating difficult tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years. Patients undergoing general anesthesia with videolaryngoscopic intubation will be assessed using both scoring systems. The study seeks to determine which system more accurately reflects the difficulty of intubation and serves as a better guide for future anesthetic management, ultimately contributing to improved patient safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective observational study aims to compare the effectiveness of two scoring systems-Paediatric Videolaryngoscopic Intubation and Difficult Airway Classification (PeDiAC) and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)-in assessing the difficulty of tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years. Pediatric patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia will be included in the study. All intubations will be performed using a C-MAC videolaryngoscope.

Demographic data such as age, sex, weight, height, ASA physical status, and comorbidities will be recorded. Intraoperative monitoring parameters including peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and heart rate will also be documented. During intubation, the glottic view will be graded according to the Modified Cormack-Lehane classification.

Additional variables-including the time required to achieve optimal glottic visualization, total intubation time (from insertion of the device to cuff inflation), number of intubation attempts, and any complications (e.g., desaturation, mucosal bleeding)-will be noted.

Following intubation, both the intubating anesthesiologist and an independent observer will assign a subjective difficulty score using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (extremely easy) to 10 (impossible). Subsequently, PeDiAC and IDS scores will be calculated for each case.

The primary objective is to determine which of the two scoring systems more accurately reflects the actual difficulty of tracheal intubation in this age group and to identify the one that may better guide future airway management strategies-ultimately aiming to improve safety and clinical outcomes in pediatric anesthesia.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

430

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Turkiye
      • Ankara, Turkiye, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will enroll pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years who are undergoing general anesthesia for elective and emergent surgical procedures requiring tracheal intubation. Patients will be intubated using a videolaryngoscope. Subjects with difficult airway history, emergency surgery, or airway pathology will be excluded. The study aims to compare two scoring systems evaluating intubation difficulty in this age group.

Description

Eligible participants will be pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years who are undergoing general anesthesia for any surgical procedure. All included patients must undergo tracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope (C-MAC). Patients must have an ASA physical status classification of I to IV and written informed consent must be obtained from a parent or legal guardian prior to participation.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pediatric patients between 0 and 5 years of age
  • Undergoing general anesthesia for any type of surgical procedure
  • ASA physical status classification I to IV
  • Written informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing awake fiberoptic intubation
  • History of tracheal resection or reconstruction surgery
  • Refusal to participate or absence of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Pediatric Patients Undergoing Videolaryngoscopic Intubation
This group includes pediatric patients aged 0-5 years undergoing elective or emergency surgery under general anesthesia with videolaryngoscopic intubation. All patients will be evaluated for intubation difficulty using both the PeDiAC and the Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of PeDiAC Score and IDS Score for Predicting Difficult Intubation in Children Aged 0-5 Years
Time Frame: Immediately after tracheal intubation
This outcome measure evaluates the effectiveness of two scoring systems-PeDiAC and Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS)-in reflecting the difficulty of tracheal intubation in pediatric patients aged 0 to 5 years. Both scores will be calculated for each patient immediately after intubation. The correlation between each score and the actual intubation experience will be statistically analyzed to determine which scoring system better predicts intubation difficulty.
Immediately after tracheal intubation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Anesthesia

Subscribe