Effectiveness of Gait Retraining in Female Runners With Patellofemoral Pain

September 12, 2025 updated by: Beijing Sport University

Effectiveness of Gait Retraining in Female Runners With Patellofemoral Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most common running-related overuse injury, with prevalence up to 17% among runners. Increased patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS) is a major biomechanical contributor to PFP. Traditional strengthening exercises improve function but do not alter running biomechanics. Gait retraining, particularly cadence modification, has been proposed as a promising approach to reduce PFJS and alleviate symptoms. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials remains limited. This study investigates whether wearable device-assisted gait retraining reduces pain, improves function, and modifies running biomechanics in female runners with PFP compared to education alone.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100084
        • Beijing Sport University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female, Age 18-45 years
  • Unilateral/bilateral anterior knee pain > 4 weeks
  • VAS pain ≥ 3/10 during running and ≥ 2 of the following: jumping, squatting, kneeling, stairs, prolonged sitting, or resisted knee extension
  • Running ≥ 15 km per week
  • Natural rearfoot striker

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute trauma, history of patellar dislocation, meniscal/chondral lesions
  • Prior knee surgery or injection in past 12 months
  • Rheumatologic, neurologic, or degenerative disease
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Gait retraining group
Participants received a 6-week gait retraining program plus patient education. The gait retraining program primarily consisted of increasing the step rate by 10%, monitored via a smartwatch.
The intervention is a wearable device-assisted gait retraining program designed specifically for female runners with patellofemoral pain (PFP). Unlike conventional physiotherapy or exercise-based interventions, this program integrates real-time biofeedback through a commercially available smartwatch and its mobile application. Participants are instructed to increase their step rate by 10% above their preferred cadence. The smartwatch provides auditory metronome cues and real-time cadence feedback to ensure accurate step-rate modification.
PFP education, load management strategies, symptom-based training modifications, and strengthening exercises.
Active Comparator: Control group
Participants received a 6-week patient education program, which included PFP education, load management strategies, symptom-based training modifications, and strengthening exercises.
PFP education, load management strategies, symptom-based training modifications, and strengthening exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analogue Scale for Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 18
The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a validated, widely used instrument for assessing subjective pain intensity. It consists of a 10-centimeter horizontal line, with one end (0) representing "no pain" and the other end (10) representing "worst imaginable pain."
Baseline, Week 6, Week 18

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anterior Knee Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 18
The Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), also referred to as the Kujala Score, is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to evaluate symptoms and functional limitations associated with anterior knee pain and patellofemoral disorders. It consists of 13 items covering domains such as pain during various activities (e.g., walking, running, jumping, climbing stairs, squatting), functional limitations, abnormal gait, muscle atrophy, and difficulty with prolonged sitting. Each item is scored on an ordinal scale, and the total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function and fewer symptoms.
Baseline, Week 6, Week 18
Peak Knee Flexion Angle During Running
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
Peak knee flexion angle will be assessed during running trials using a 3-dimensional motion capture system. Reflective markers will be placed according to a standard lower-limb biomechanical model. The angle is defined as the maximum knee flexion angle observed during stance phase of running.
Baseline, Week 6
Ground Reaction Force During Running
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
Ground reaction force (GRF) will be measured during overground running using embedded force plates synchronized with motion capture. The variable of interest is the peak force normalized to body weight.
Baseline, Week 6
Running Cadence
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
Running cadence will be assessed as the number of steps taken per minute during running. Measurement will be conducted using a wearable device running sessions
Baseline, Week 6
Weekly running distance
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 6
Weekly running distance will be recorded as the total distance covered in running sessions over a 7-day period. Data will be collected from participants' GPS-based tracking devices.
Baseline, Week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hao-Nan Wang, Beijing Sport University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

September 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

- What IPD will be shared: De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the publication, including baseline characteristics, outcome measures (pain scores, functional scores, running mechanics), and adverse events.

- When will IPD be available: Beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results, for up to 5 years.

- With whom: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims consistent with the original study.

- For what types of analyses: For individual participant data meta-analyses and reproducibility purposes.

- How to access data: Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author (wanghaonan@bsu.edu.cn). Data access will be provided via secure data transfer after approval of a data-sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results, for up to 5 years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

- With whom: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve aims consistent with the original study.

- For what types of analyses: For individual participant data meta-analyses and reproducibility purposes.

- How to access data: Proposals should be directed to the corresponding author (wanghaonan@bsu.edu.cn). Data access will be provided via secure data transfer after approval of a data-sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patellofemoral Pain, PFP

Clinical Trials on Gait retraining

Subscribe