The Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin and Crisugabalin in Patients With Fibromyalgia

February 9, 2026 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin Monotherapy Versus Other Neuromodulatory Drugs (Crisugabalin) in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia: A Multicenter Clinical Study

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain syndrome characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and emotional disorders. Its onset is related to factors such as central sensitization and imbalance of neurotransmitters. The current mainstream treatments include pregabalin, but the efficacy of pregabalin is limited, with only 25%-40% pain relief rate, and adverse reactions are common. crisugabalin, a new highly selective α2δ ligand, has shown potential in animal models or preliminary clinical trials, but there is insufficient evidence for its application in FM. This study aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of pregabalin or crisugabalin in treating FM, with the aim of providing a better treatment option for FM patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1116

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, Beijing 100070
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with FM according to the 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 FM diagnostic criteria;
  • Aged over 18 years old;
  • Suffering from moderate to severe FM, refractory to non-pharmacological interventions and without prior exposure to recommend pharmacological treatments for FM;
  • Baseline numeric rating scale (NRS) score of 4 or higher;
  • Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels below twice the upper limit of normal range;
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 30 mL/min/1.73 m²;
  • Willingness to provide informed consent and adequate cognitive and language capabilities to meet all study requirements;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous allergic reactions to pregabalin, crisugabalin, or any of their excipients;
  • Prior diagnosis of epilepsy or depression requiring antidepressant therapy;
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • Has severe systemic illnesses, such as poorly controlled hypertension, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, or significant cardiac impairment;
  • Suffering from acute or chronic pain disorders other than FM.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pregabalin group
For the pregabalin group, treatment will be initiated at a dosage of 150 mg daily, administered into 2 or 3 divided doses. After 3 to 7 days, the dose will be titrated to 300 mg per day, with subsequent incremental increases of 150 mg daily permitted at 3-day to 7-day intervals based on therapeutic response and tolerability, up to a maximum dose of 450 mg daily.
Experimental: Crisugabalin group
For the crisugabalin group, therapy will begin at 20 mg twice daily, with a maximum allowable dose of 40 mg twice daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients achieving pain relief
Time Frame: At the 12-weeks
The proportion of patients achieving pain relief defined as the proportion of patients whose baseline average pain intensity is reduced by at least 50%. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
At the 12-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The short-form 36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The SF-36 assesses health-related quality of life, capturing preferences across various health states. It assesses 8 dimensions: physical functioning, physical role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Scores range from 0 to 100 for each dimension, with higher scores indicating better health status.
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The average pain intensity
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
The average pain intensity. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
The worst pain intensity
Time Frame: At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
The worst pain intensity. The pain intensity will be measured based on NRS, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents worst pain imaginable.
At the weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12
Dose of crisugabalin or pregabalin
Time Frame: At the week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
the dose of experimental drug
At the week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12
Average weekly consumption of rescue analgesics
Time Frame: at weeks 4, 8, 12
Acetaminophen will be permitted as rescue medication for FM-related pain, at doses up to 1000 mg per administration and not exceeding 3000 mg per day. All rescue medication use, including dose and frequency, will be recorded prospectively.
at weeks 4, 8, 12
The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The Revised FM Impact Questionnaire is a 21-item self-administered questionnaire, based on symptoms reported within the preceding 7 days. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating worse health status.
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) severity (BPI-S) and interfere (BPI-I) subsc
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The BPI-S assesses pain intensity over the past 24 hours, including 4 items. The BPI-I evaluates the degree to which pain interferes with daily activities, comprising 7 items. Each BPI item is rated on a 0 to 10 NRS, with 0 represents no pain or does not interfere, and 10 represents worst pain imaginable or interferes completely. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity or interfere.
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale
Time Frame: at week 12
A 7-point patient-reported Likert scale for evaluating subjective overall change in health/symptoms from baseline, used to assess treatment efficacy in clinical research and practice.
at week 12
The Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (MOS)
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The MOS uses a 6-point scale to evaluate various dimensions of sleep, consisting of 12 items. A score of 1 indicates persistent presence, with a score of 6 denotes complete absence.
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The Beck Depression Inventory-Ⅱ (BD-Ⅱ)
Time Frame: At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
The BD-Ⅱ employs a 4-point scale (ranging from 0 to 3) to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms, comprising 21 items in total. A score of 0 indicates the absence of symptoms, while a score of 3 reflects severe symptomatology.
At the weeks 4, 8, and 12
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks
Adverse Events are defined as events that occur the course of treatment, were not present before prior to the intervention, or represent a worsening of pre-existing conditions. These events will be systematically documented and categorized by severity into grades such as mild, moderate, severe, or life-threatening.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures and appendices) are available. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author Fang Luo on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Crisugabalin

Subscribe