- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07222033
Self-balancing Personal Exoskeleton for SCI (WINY)
Empowering Mobility in People With Spinal Cord Injury With a Hands-free, Self-balancing Personal Exoskeleton
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This personal exoskeleton, developed by Wandercraft as a new version of the Atalante X, offers a novel hands-free and self-balancing design, aiming at enhancing stability and mobility for users in daily activities.
The study features an interventional, prospective, single-group, and open-label design, conducted over 3 to 4 weeks in a US investigation site. It aims to enroll up to 12 SCI users and their 12 companions, resulting in 12 SCI user-companion pairs.
Over the course of nine to ten scheduled visits, participants undergo a sequence of procedures, beginning with screening and device fitting. This is followed by five training sessions which conclude with an evaluation to issue a competency certificate to confirm the ability to use the device across all its "basic skills". Additionally, two sessions are dedicated to evaluating the exoskeleton's effectiveness outcomes, complemented by an extra practice session. Each visit lasts an average of 1.5 hours.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
- Phone Number: 646-448-4787
- Email: Joshua.breighner@winypt.health
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10010
- Recruiting
- Walk in New York (WINY) Physical Therapy, P.C.
-
Contact:
- Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
- Phone Number: 646-448-4787
- Email: Joshua.breighner@winypt.health
-
Principal Investigator:
- Joshua Breighner, PT DPT
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
SCI user inclusion Criteria:
- Any gender, age 18 years or older;
- Motor complete or incomplete SCI with lesions at or above T6;
- ≥ 6 months post SCI;
- Able and willing to attend 9 to 10 visits1 to the center, including sessions of training and assessments of one-to-three hours duration;
- Able to read, understand, and provide informed consent;
- Living in the US and speaks English.
SCI user exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of neurological injury other than SCI;
- Progressive condition that would be expected to result in changing neurological status;
- Severe concurrent medical disease, illness or condition judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
- Unhealed or unstable traumatic or high impact lower extremity fracture of any duration that is, in the clinical judgement of the study physician, exclusionary for standing and walking;
- Knee (proximal tibia and/or distal femur) BMD <0.60 gm/cm2;
- Total hip BMD T-scores < -3.5;
- Fragility, minimal trauma, or low impact fracture of the lower extremity since SCI;
- Untreatable severe spasticity judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
- Untreated/uncontrolled hypertension, as judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
- Unresolved orthostatic hypotension (change from baseline seated BP to a fall in 20mmHg SBP and/or fall in 10mmHG DBP and symptoms when standing), or as judged to be contraindicated by the site physician;
- Open or unhealed skin pressure sores, abrasions, or bruises at any of the contact points of the exoskeleton;
- Morphological contraindications to the use of the device;
- Uncorrectable leg length discrepancy over 2 cm (about 0.79 in) when using additional correction tools;
- Unable to effectively operate the device with a hand-control interface, due to functional and/or cognitive impairment, evaluated based on the ability to manipulate the joystick in all direction, press and identify buttons on the hand control interface.
- Improper fitting in the device;
- Psychopathology documentation in the medical record that may conflict with study objectives;
- Pregnancy or women who plan to become pregnant during the study period;
- Concurrent participation in another interventional trial;
- History of uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia;
- Presence colostomy and/or urostomy;
- Ventilator use at the time of the exoskeleton use;
Companion inclusion Criteria:
- Any gender, age 18 years or older;
- Willingness to attend 9 to 10 visits to the center, including sessions of training and assessments of one-to-three hours duration with the SCI user;
- Able to read, understand and provide informed consent;
- Living in the US and speaks English.
Companion exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to communicate with an assistant due to cognitive and language disorders;
- Any disease, concomitant injury, or condition that interferes with the performance or interpretation of the protocol- specified assessments;
- Insufficient strength and performance capability, evidenced by the ability to hold and retain the device in case of unbalance/fall;
- Insufficient availability to complete the study;
- Concurrent participation in another interventional trial.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hands-free exoskeleton
|
A "device trainer specialist" from the investigation site will deliver training sessions with the exoskeleton to pair of participants (a pair corresponds to an individual with SCI and his/her companion).
The device trainer will follow the progression of the pair through the training program and ensure they learn all the device "basic skills".
Each training session lasts an average of 1.5 hours, variations according to the user's learning pace and tolerance.
During the sessions with the exoskeleton, the participants will engage in mobility activities on different surfaces and perform Activities of Daily Living in simulated environments such as kitchen, bathroom, elevators and outdoor spaces.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Safety of the device for its intended use and user population.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
Collection and analysis of adverse events to evaluate the safety of the device for its intended use and user population, specifically for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) performing ambulatory activities hands-free, accompanied by a companion.
|
Throughout the study and up until the end of Visit 9, after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of subjects who complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) in 3min or less.
Time Frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
The TUG evaluates the time from starting in a seated position to stand-up, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back 3 meters and sit down on indoor surface.
|
After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
|
Proportion of subjects who complete a distance of at least 40m on the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT).
Time Frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
The 6MWT measures the distance in meters traversed over 6 min, on indoor surface.
|
After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
|
Proportion of subjects who can complete at least 4 out of the 6 Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), in various simulated environments and with the exoskeleton.
Time Frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
The ADLs are done standing in front of the countertop in the kitchen, in a simulated living room, taking a 50m walk in the outdoor environment, taking the elevator, in the bathroom and walking in a hallway and through a door to get to the next room.
|
After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
|
Proportion of subjects who complete the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) on indoor surfaces in 1 minute or less.
Time Frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
The 10MWT measures the time in seconds taken to walk 10 meters.
|
After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
|
Proportion of subjects who can don or doff the device within 10 minutes each, separately.
Time Frame: After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
After a mean of 7.5 hours of training and a mean of 9 hours of training.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of users who pass the device "basic skills" certification evaluation at the end of visit 6.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 7.5 hours of training.
|
During the Certification Evaluation, the users' performance in executing all the device usability critical tasks will be observed and assessed by the trainer to ensure they are performed correctly (i.e., executed safely, regardless of the level of companion assistance, that is documented but isn't a criterion for success).
The "basic skills" certification evaluation is passed if all the device basic skills have been learnt through the previous training sessions with the device (visits 2-5) and the critical tasks are re-executed correctly during the evaluation at visit 6.
The device basic skills cover device theoretical knowledge, proper setup and installation in the device, walking and other ambulatory functions on different surfaces, Activities of Daily Living in indoor and outdoor environment techniques on various surfaces, and safety features such as emergency extraction.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 7.5 hours of training.
|
|
Number of users who successfully master the different basic skills at a given visit.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 7.5 hours of training.
|
For each basic skill, the visit number at which users are confirmed to have safely mastered the task is recorded on a "checklist", which lists all the device basic skills and is provided to the trainer.
The goal is to track the users' learning progress and mastery of the device over time.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 7.5 hours of training.
|
|
Evaluation of the assistance level provided by companion.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
Assistance provided by the companion when mastering each basic skill on the checklist at initial learning, at the certification evaluation, during the additional practice session and when performing each test.
A 3-point scale based on the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score, tailored to the device and its progression stage will be used: 1-Maximal assistance: The companion provides support with both hands touching the device and/or the user almost continuously.
2- Moderate assistance - The companion provides support with one or both hands touching the device and/or the user intermittently.
3- Close contact guard/no assistance - The companion does not touch the device and/or the user but is close enough to assist if needed.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Overall Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) assessed with the Borg RPE scale by the users for the entire session.
Time Frame: After an average of 7.5 hours of training, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
The Borg scale rates the perceived exertion between 6 and 20 (very very light to very very hard exertion).
The SCI users and their companions are asked to give their rating for the entire session, separately.
|
After an average of 7.5 hours of training, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Overall perceived safety with a 7-level Likert scale by the users on the entire session.
Time Frame: After an average of 7.5 hours of training, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
Each participant - SCI user and companion separately - will be asked to provide his/her level of agreement on the following statement: "I felt safe during the session."
by using a 7-level agreement scale from 1: "Strongly disagree" to 7: "Totally agree".
|
After an average of 7.5 hours of training, after an average of 7.5 hours of training and 1.5 hours of assessment and after an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Up-right time in the device at each session.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
This measure is taken by the device itself.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Numbers of steps taken in the device at each session.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
The measure is taken by the device itself.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Distance walked in the device at each session.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
The measure is taken by the device itself.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Number of times the participants walk on each type of surface at each session.
Time Frame: Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
This data is collected by the device trainers at each session.
Users are considered to have walked on a surface during a session if they have covered a minimum distance of 10 meters on that surface.
|
Throughout the study and up until an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
|
Perceived health benefits and overall satisfaction and motivation.
Time Frame: After an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
Perceived health benefits and overall satisfaction and motivation of the SCI users, assessed by a modified version of the Gagnon questionnaire.
The statements under evaluation will be taken from the 41 statements originally found in the Gagnon questionnaire that encompass seven domains : - overall program satisfaction, - satisfaction with the robotic exoskeleton, - learnability of the robotic exoskeleton, - satisfaction with the program attributes, - perceived health benefits of walking with the robotic exoskeleton, - perceived risks and fears of walking with the robotic exoskeleton and - perceived motivation to engage in regular physical activity.
|
After an average of 9 hours of training and 3 hours of assessment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIP007 WINY
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury
-
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingChronic Spinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) | Spinal Cord Injury | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | SCI | Subacute Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
Lian-Cing Yan, MSPTNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Spinal Cord Injury/Damage | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | Spinal Cord Injury T1-L2 | Epidural Electrical StimulationTaiwan
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingBeijing Pins Medical Co., Ltd; Beijing Xinzhida Neural Technology Co., Ltd; Hangzhou...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Motor Deficits | Gait Impairment | Gait Training | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Motor Impairment | Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Injury (Quadraplegia)China
-
Taipei Veterans General Hospital, TaiwanThe Industrial Technology Research InstituteUnknownSpinal Cord Injuries | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryTaiwan
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine Injury | Complete Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury | Cord Injury, Spinal | Cord Infarction Spinal
-
University of FloridaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedSCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Incomplete Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
Jill M. Wecht, Ed.D.Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRecruitingBlood Pressure | Spinal Cord Injuries | SCI - Spinal Cord Injury | Blood Pressure Disorders | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Acute Spinal Cord Injury | Neuromodulation | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
NervGen PharmaTerminatedSpinal Cord Injuries | Chronic Spinal Cord Injury | Subacute Spinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
MetroHealth Medical CenterNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western...RecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury CervicalUnited States
-
Anne BrydenNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Case Western... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level | Spinal Cord Injury Cervical | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Complete Lesion | Spinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level With Incomplete LesionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Hands-free exoskeleton
-
WandercraftCompletedSpinal Cord Injury | Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis | Paraplegia, Complete | Guillain Barré Syndrome | Paraplegia, IncompleteFrance
-
WandercraftKessler FoundationRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaUnited States
-
WandercraftRecruitingNeurodegenerative Diseases | Spinal Cord Injuries | Gait Disorders, Neurologic | Cerebrovascular Accident | Motor Disorders | Weakness, MuscleFrance
-
WandercraftCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | Tetraplegia | ParaplegiaFrance
-
WandercraftRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaFrance
-
WandercraftJames J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamU.S. Department of EducationCompletedCerebral Hemiplegia
-
University of FloridaCompletedInsufficient LactationUnited States
-
Tarek AlsaiedCompletedSingle-ventricleUnited States
-
Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and WelfareCompletedStroke | ExoskeletonTaiwan