- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06538974
Adherence to Long-term Exoskeleton Rehabilitation to Treat Lower Limb Weakness and / or Deficiencies in Adult Population (ALERT)
In 2019, approximately 2.4 billion people worldwide required rehabilitation for various health pathologies, a 63% increase since 1990. It has been suggested that current rehabilitation frameworks (inpatient, outpatient, and community-based) are insufficient to meet local population needs due to issues like long waiting times, lack of facilities, prioritization, funding, and accessibility.Patients with lower limb weaknesses, resulting from various conditions (for example stroke, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury and others) require long-term management and motivation for engagement, which are crucial for functional outcomes. This highlights the need for sustainable gait and balance rehabilitation.
New technologies like exoskeletons have shown promising results in short-term inpatient programs, improving gait, balance, and quality of life, however, long-term follow-up data are still needed.
The present clinical investigation is a national, prospective, open-label interventional trial, proposing a 12-month outpatient rehabilitation program with the Atalante X exoskeleton to treat lower limb weakness and/or impairments in 100 participants. The rehabilitation program consists of at least one exoskeleton rehabilitation session per week. At the end of the first-year experimental phase, participants can continue for an additional year in the voluntary phase. The program aims to explore the potential long-term effects of supervised robotic rehabilitation on motor, cognitive, bowel, bladder functions, quality of life, and well-being. Assessments are conducted at baseline, after 4 and 12 months of exoskeleton rehabilitation, and at 16 and 24 months for participants in the voluntary phase.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Rebecca Sauvagnac, MD
- Phone Number: +33 (0)1 79 35 31 09
- Email: rebecca.sauvagnac@wandercraft.health
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Dijana Nuic, Ph.D
- Phone Number: +33 (0)1 79 35 31 09
- Email: dijana.nuic@wandercraft.health
Study Locations
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75004
- Recruiting
- Wandercraft
-
Contact:
- Rebecca Sauvagnac, MD
- Phone Number: +33 (0)1 79 35 31 09
- Email: rebecca.sauvagnac@wandercraft.health
-
Principal Investigator:
- Rebecca Sauvagnac, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient suffering from lower limb weaknesses and / or deficiencies regardless of the cause
- Adult patient ≥18 years old
- Patient able to read and write in French and who have signed an informed consent form
- Patient affiliated to a social security system.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individual with severe spasticity of adductor muscles, hamstring, quadriceps and triceps surae. Severe spasticity is defined by a score of 4 on the modified Ashworth scale
- Pregnant woman
- Individual with history of osteoporotic fracture and / or pathology or treatment causing secondary osteoporosis
- Pressure Ulcer of Grade I or higher according to the NPUAP International Pressure Ulcer Classification System- EPUAP, in areas of contact with the Atalante X system
- Severe aphasia limiting ability to express needs or to fulfil questionnaires, at the discretion of the physician.
- Patient with a cardiac or respiratory contraindication to physical exertion, at discretion of the physician
- Patient unable to deliver his/her consent
- Patient under legal protection
- Patient participating at the same time in another study
- Patients with morphological contraindications to the use of the Atalante X exoskeleton (as per user's manual) with exceptions as follows: knee flessum of 20° authorized if sensibility is present; equinus of the ankle of 20° allowed regardless of presence or absence of sensibility, hip flessum of 20° allowed regardless of presence or absence of sensibility.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Hands-free exoskeleton
|
During the one-year intervention period, participants will complete at least one exoskeleton session per week (≥36 sessions) with the Atalante X.
The additional voluntary year follows the same design.
During sessions with the exoskeleton, the patients will perform ambulatory exercises with the device, with a gradual increase of intensity through the sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Function in Sitting Test
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
The Function in Sitting Test consists of 14 items, each scored on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates the lowest ability and 4 represents normal sitting abilities.
The maximum achievable score is 56, reflecting normal ability.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
10-meter walk test
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Gait speed during 10 meter walk
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration in Balance
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration in Balance test evaluates how different sensory inputs contribute to balance control by assessing balance tasks performed under different sensory conditions: eyes open, firm surface; eyes closed, firm surface; eyes open, foam surface; and eyes closed, foam surface.
Scores are based on the time the participant can maintain balance (0-30 seconds for each task, with the maximum score being 120 seconds for all tasks, higher scores reflecting good sensory integration and balance control).
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Timed Up and Go
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Timed Up and Go is a timed task where patient is asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk and sit again.
Based on established thresholds in the literature for various pathologies, the test helps determine if the participant is at risk of falling.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Functional Independence Measure
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Functional Independence Measure scale score measures the level of disability and the amount of assistance required for an individual to perform activities of daily living.
The total score ranges from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater independence.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
6-minute walk test
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
6-minute walk test measures the walked distance during a 6 minutes' walk, thus assessing walking endurance and aerobic capacities.
Results are compared to normative values based on population-specific references available in the literature.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
A five-step clinical assessment of spasticity
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
A five-step clinical assessment of spasticity is used to assess adductor muscles, gluteus maximus, hamstrings, rectus femoris, gastrocnemius and soleus.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Biering-Sorensen test
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Biering-Sorensen test measures isometric endurance of the trunk extensor muscles, higher times reflecting better endurance.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Muscle strength
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months, at 16 and 24 months
|
Hip flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, knee flexion and extension, plantar flexion and extension muscle strength is assessed by using a dynamometer measure (expressed in Newton).
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months, at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment is a cognition assessment with scores ranging from 0 to 30, the latter signifying a normal cognitive function.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Adverse events monitoring
Time Frame: Through study completion, up to 24 months for each participant
|
Safety is monitored through adverse events occurrence.
|
Through study completion, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
Modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months, at 16 and 24 months
|
Modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion measures a level of perceived effort and exertion, breathlessness and fatigue during physical activity with rating going from 0 - nothing at all to 10 - meaning almost maximal effort.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months, at 16 and 24 months
|
|
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
System Usability Scale measures usability of the exoskeleton training.
The scores are from 0 to 100, scores above 72.5 reflecting good usability.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
General satisfaction questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
General satisfaction is assessed by 3-item questionnaire, assessing interest, satisfaction and level of discomfort.
The score is comprised from 0 to 10, higher scores reflecting higher satisfaction following the assessed exoskeleton session.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Specific acceptability
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Specific acceptability is assessed by five-item questionnaire evaluating participants feedback on post-session anxiety, motivation, safety, fatigue and pain.The score is comprised from 0 to 10, higher scores reflecting higher perceived specific acceptability following the assessed exoskeleton session.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) assesses health related quality of life, by evaluating 8 subdimensions which concern physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, emotional, and mental health.
Two summary scores can be retrieved from the questionnaire: physical health and mental health.
For people unable to walk, thus using wheelchair, additional three questions will be added from SF-36 walk-wheel questionnaire.
Each domain is scored separately, and scores range from 0 to 100.
The higher scores indicate better health status.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Neurogenic bowel dysfunction score measures bowel function, having the scores ranging from 0 to 47, scores above 14 signifying severe bowel dysfunction.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Qualiveen questionnaire
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Qualiveen questionnaire assesses neurogenic bladder function related quality of life, each item being scored on a Likert type scale ranging from 0 to 4, assessing 4 areas: discomfort, constraints, fears, and the patient's experience.
The score ranges from 0 to 4, higher scores indicating lower bladder function related quality of life.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
DN4
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
DN4 questionnaire is used to identify neuropathic pain in patients.
The score ranges from 0 to 10, a score of 4 or more is considered indicative of neuropathic pain.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Sensation assessment
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
3-item sensation assessment with binary choice responses (yes or no) assessed by a physician regarding participants' capacity to perceive superficial sensation (touch awareness, pain perception) and proprioceptive sensation (kinesthetic awareness).
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale is a 14-question instrument rated on a 4-point severity scale ranging between no impairment (0) and severe impairment (3).
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale consists of two scales, one for anxiety, and one for depression, with a maximum score of 21 for each, respectively.
Total scores from 8 to 10 for anxiety and depression are considered to be borderline abnormal and scores higher than 11 pathological.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Goal Attainment Scaling
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
Goal Attainment scaling tasks are individually identified to suit the subject, and the levels are individually set around their current and expected levels of performance.
The progression is measured by identified levels that are as follows: Baseline score (-2), improved less than expected (-1), improved as expected (0), improved more than expected (+1) and improved much more than expected (+2).
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
The Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale
Time Frame: At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
The Sport Injury Rehabilitation Adherence Scale measures clinically-based adherence to rehabilitation.
The overall score is 15, higher numbers, representing better adherence to rehabilitation.
|
At baseline, at 4 and 12 months; at 16 and 24 months
|
|
Number of performed exoskeleton sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The number of exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions performed will be tracked for each participant.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
Duration of exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The duration of exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant, and will be expressed in minutes.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
The duration of verticalization during exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The time spent in an upright position (verticalization) during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant, and expressed in minutes.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
Number of steps performed during exoskeleton sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The overall number of steps performed during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
Level of device assistance during exoskeleton sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The level of device assistance during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant, and expressed as a percentage.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
Number of passive steps performed during exoskeleton sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The number of passive steps performed during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
|
Number of active steps performed during exoskeleton sessions
Time Frame: Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
The number of active steps performed during the exoskeleton rehabilitation sessions will be tracked for each participant.
|
Weekly, up to 24 months for each participant
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rebecca Sauvagnac, MD, Wandercraft
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006-2017. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0. Epub 2020 Dec 1. Erratum In: Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):198. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32592-7.
- Eldar R, Kullmann L, Marincek C, Sekelj-Kauzlaric K, Svestkova O, Palat M. Rehabilitation medicine in countries of Central/Eastern Europe. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(2):134-41. doi: 10.1080/09638280701191776.
- Kamenov K, Mills JA, Chatterji S, Cieza A. Needs and unmet needs for rehabilitation services: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 May;41(10):1227-1237. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1422036. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Pathologic Processes
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cerebrovascular Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Wounds and Injuries
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Trauma, Nervous System
- Spinal Cord Diseases
- Stroke
- Muscle Weakness
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Gait Disorders, Neurologic
- Motor Disorders
- Asthenia
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIP005 ALERT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neurodegenerative Diseases
-
Fujian Medical University Union HospitalRecruitingNeurodegenerative DisordersChina
-
University of OviedoUniversity of LeonCompleted
-
Imperial College LondonWithdrawn
-
First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityRecruitingNeurodegenerative DisordersChina
-
University of PennsylvaniaAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsRecruiting
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceRecruitingNeurodegenerative DisordersFrance
-
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.CompletedNeuropsychiatric Symptoms Related to Neurodegenerative DiseaseSerbia, United States, Poland, Georgia, Russian Federation, Bulgaria, Colombia, Czechia, Mexico, Romania, South Africa, Ukraine
-
The University of Hong Konghealth bureau, hong kongActive, not recruiting
-
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.CompletedNeuropsychiatric Symptoms Related to Neurodegenerative DiseaseUnited States, Russian Federation, Serbia, Poland, Georgia, Czechia, Bulgaria, Colombia, Mexico, Romania, South Africa, Ukraine
-
Fujian Medical University Union HospitalRecruitingNeurodegenerative DisorderChina
Clinical Trials on Hands-free exoskeleton
-
WandercraftCompletedSpinal Cord Injury | Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis | Paraplegia, Complete | Guillain Barré Syndrome | Paraplegia, IncompleteFrance
-
WandercraftKessler FoundationRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaUnited States
-
WandercraftCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | Tetraplegia | ParaplegiaFrance
-
WandercraftRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaFrance
-
WandercraftRecruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaUnited States
-
WandercraftJames J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI) | Paraplegia and TetraplegiaUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamU.S. Department of EducationCompletedCerebral Hemiplegia
-
University of FloridaCompletedInsufficient LactationUnited States
-
Tarek AlsaiedCompletedSingle-ventricleUnited States
-
Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and WelfareCompletedStroke | ExoskeletonTaiwan