One vs. Two Stents for Gallbladder Disease

December 12, 2025 updated by: Eric J. Vargas Valls, Mayo Clinic

A Randomized Trial of One vs. Two Transpapillary Cystic Duct Stents to Prevent Recurrent Symptomatic Gallbladder Disease in Non-Cholecystectomy Candidates

This randomized trial will look at whether placing two cystic duct stents is more effective than one cystic duct stent in preventing recurrent gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) among patients who are not immediate surgical candidates for removal of their gallbladder.

The study will evaluate the safety profile, including rates of recurrent cholecystitis, biliary colic, and procedure-related complications, and technical success, defined as successful placement of stents into the gallbladder.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does placement of two transpapillary cystic duct stents reduce the risk of recurrent symptomatic gallbladder disease compared to one stent?
  2. Is there a difference in procedure-related adverse events (post-ERCP pancreatitis, cholangitis, stent migration) between the two strategies?

Researchers will compare outcomes between patients randomized to one stent versus two stents to determine which approach provides better long-term gallbladder drainage and fewer recurrent events.

Participants will:

Be evaluated for eligibility and provide informed consent prior to undergoing an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), an endoscopy where a guidewire is placed into the bile duct from the small intestine.

They will then undergo ERCP with transpapillary cystic duct stent placement, randomized to one or two stents.

All participants will receive standard post-procedure care and follow-up assessments for recurrence, adverse events, and need for reintervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eric Vargas

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males or non-pregnant females presenting with cholecystitis, biliary colic or gallstone pancreatitis.
  2. Age 18-95.
  3. Participants must be willing and able to provide informed consent
  4. Referred for ERCP for management of 1) suspected choledocholithiasis 2) acute biliary pancreatitis and/or 3) acute cholangitis in whom cholecystectomy is expected to be delayed > 30 days or are deemed to not be surgical candidates for cholecystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to provide informed consent
  2. History of surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy (e.g. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Billroth I/II) precluding standard ERCP
  3. History of primary sclerosing cholangitis
  4. History of gallbladder cancer
  5. History of cholecystectomy
  6. Unsuccessful biliary cannulation during ERCP -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ONE STENT ARM
Participant assigned to this Arm will undergo ERCP and have one transpapillary duct stent placed for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease
One transpapillary cystic duct stent will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP
Active Comparator: TWO STENT ARM
Participant assigned to this ARM will undergo ERCP and have two transpapillary duct stent placed for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder disease.
Two transpapillary cystic duct stents will be placed into the gallbladder via ERCP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined as absence of recurrence of symptomatic gallbladder disease (cholecystitis, gallstone pancreatitis, or biliary colic) at 6 months post-procedure.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success
Time Frame: 1 day
Defined as the ability to place the allocated number of transpapillary double pigtail stents into the gallbladder.
1 day
Time to Recurrence
Time Frame: 6 months
The amount of time (days) from the index procedure to when a recurrence occurs
6 months
Reintervention
Time Frame: 6 months
The proportion of participants who receive another endoscopic procedure due to failure/adverse events related to the index procedure
6 months
Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 months
The type and severity of adverse events that occur related to the index procedure for stent placement
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Vargas, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 27, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 27, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

October 30, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified participant data and outcomes will be shared after study approval of request from investigators by the study team

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 year after publication of results to 5 years after publication

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on ERCP with one stent placement

Subscribe