- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07238101
Hemodynamic Effects of Fentanyl Vs Dexmedetomidine in Spine Surgery
Hemodynamic Effects of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine in Spine Surgery
Researchers will compare dexmedetomidine to fentanyl to see which drug provides better hemodynamic stability during spinal surgery.
Participants will :
- Receive either dexmedetomidine or fentanyl as part of their anesthesia during elective surgery
- Have their mean arterial pressure and heart rate measured at several time points during the procedure
- Be monitored throughout surgery to assess intraoperative hemodynamic responses and stability
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Spinal surgery is frequently associated with perioperative hemodynamic fluctuations and significant postoperative pain. Maintaining stable intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate is essential to minimize surgical bleeding, protect neural structures, and promote optimal recovery. Dexmedetomidine, a highly selective α₂-adrenergic receptor agonist, provides sedation, analgesia, and sympatholytic effects without causing respiratory depression and may contribute to improved cardiovascular stability during anesthesia. Fentanyl, a potent synthetic opioid, is widely utilized as an analgesic adjunct in general anesthesia but may offer less consistent hemodynamic control.
This study is a prospective, interventional, randomized, double-blind controlled trial conducted at Adam Malik General Hospital, Medan, Indonesia, following approval from the institutional ethics committee. A total of 50 adult patients scheduled for elective spinal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled using consecutive sampling and randomly assigned to receive either dexmedetomidine or fentanyl as part of intraoperative management.
Eligible participants were aged 17-60 years and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III. Patients with known drug hypersensitivity, significant cardiac or vascular abnormalities, or contraindications to the study drugs were excluded.
Hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate, were recorded at baseline (T0) and at predetermined intraoperative time points (T1-T12). The primary outcome measure was intraoperative MAP, while secondary outcomes included heart rate and estimated blood loss. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, with a significance threshold of p < 0.05.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Sumatra
-
Medan, North Sumatra, Indonesia, 20222
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Sumatera Utara
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 17 and 60 years old
- Classified as ASA physical status 1-3
- Scheduled for elective spinal surgery
- Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of drug hipersensitivity to fentanyl or dexmetomidine
- Presence of Cardiac Anatomical abnormalities
- Vsacular disorders or other conditions that may interfere with the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Dexmedetomidine Group
Participants in this group received dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5 μg/kgBW/hour intravenously as part of anesthesia management for spinal surgery.
The purpose is to evaluate the effect of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic stability, including heart rate and mean arterial pressure, during and after induction of anesthesia.
|
Intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine at a dose of 0.5 μg/kgBW/hour during spinal surgery.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha-2 adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties.
The aim is to evaluate its effect on maintaining hemodynamic stability, including mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate, during and after anesthesia induction.
|
|
Experimental: Fentanyl Group
Participants in this group received fentanyl at a dose of 1.5 μg/kgBW/hour intravenously as part of anesthesia management for spinal surgery.
This arm serves as the comparison group to evaluate differences in hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate and mean arterial pressure compared to dexmedetomidine.
|
Intravenous administration of fentanyl at a dose of 1.5 μg/kgBW/hour during spinal surgery.
Fentanyl is a potent synthetic opioid analgesic used to manage pain and modulate hemodynamic responses during surgery.
This group serves as the comparator to evaluate differences in hemodynamic parameters, particularly MAP and heart rate, compared to dexmedetomidine.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) during spinal surgery
Time Frame: MAP will be recorded at baseline (T0), and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after drug administration
|
Measurement of mean arterial pressure (MAP) at multiple time points to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on intraoperative hemodynamic stability during spinal surgery.
|
MAP will be recorded at baseline (T0), and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after drug administration
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Heart Rate (Pulse) during spinal surgery
Time Frame: Heart rate will be recorded at the same time points as MAP: baseline (T0), and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after drug administration
|
Measurement of heart rate (pulse) at multiple time points to evaluate hemodynamic response and stability between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl groups.
|
Heart rate will be recorded at the same time points as MAP: baseline (T0), and at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after drug administration
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kaye AD, Chernobylsky DJ, Thakur P, Siddaiah H, Kaye RJ, Eng LK, Harbell MW, Lajaunie J, Cornett EM. Dexmedetomidine in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Postoperative Pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Apr 2;24(5):21. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-00853-z.
- Gilpin B. Changing the public health landscape through advocacy. Circulation. 1997 Apr 15;95(8):1978. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.95.8.1978. No abstract available.
- Hasmi. Epidemiological research methods. Jakarta: CV Trans Info Media; 2016.
- Rizkiya P, Margarita N, Harijono B, Herawati L. Analysis of dexmedetomidine addition in elective major spinal surgery in RSUD Dr. Soetomo. Maj Anestesiol Indones. 2020;9(2):1-9.
- Yun SH, Song SW, Park JC. Beneficial effects of the addition of intrathecal fentanyl to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2017;12(3):233-239. doi:10.17085/apm.2017.12.3.233.
- Park SJ, Shin S, Kim SH, Kim HW, Kim SH, Do HY, Choi YS. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia in Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2017 May;58(3):650-657. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.3.650.
- Choi JW, Joo JD, Kim DW, In JH, Kwon SY, Seo K, Han D, Cheon GY, Jung HS. Comparison of an Intraoperative Infusion of Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, and Remifentanil on Perioperative Hemodynamics, Sedation Quality, and Postoperative Pain Control. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Sep;31(9):1485-90. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1485.
- Khosravi F, Sharifi M, Jarineshin H. Comparative Study of Fentanyl vs Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Intrathecal Bupivacaine in Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Pain Res. 2020 Oct 7;13:2475-2482. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S265161. eCollection 2020.
- Sahraei R, Ghaedi M, Haghbeen M, Sadegh M, Jahromi S. Comparison of ketamine and dexmedetomidine in reducing complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023;12(2).
- Emam MWM, Hassan BEDE, Abd El-Hamid HM, Ibrahim IA, Saleh MAE. Comparative study between dexmedetomidine and fentanyl as adjuvants to bupivacaine for postoperative epidural analgesia in abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2023;39(1):635-641. doi:10.1080/11101849.2023.2238520
- Sigdel R, Lama M, Gurung S, et al. Intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl versus bupivacaine alone in cases undergoing elective cesarean section: comparison of hemodynamics. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2023;21(2).
- Hassanin AAM, Ali NS, Elhiny MMMA. Effect of dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl on recovery responses to tracheal extubation in vitrectomy: randomized controlled trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2023;39(1):40-49. doi:10.1080/11101849.2023.2166617.
- Ma RX, Qiao RQ, Xu MY, Li RF, Hu YC. Application of Controlled Hypotension During Surgery for Spinal Metastasis. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan-Dec;21:15330338221105718. doi: 10.1177/15330338221105718.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 216 /KEPK/USU/2024
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Spine Surgery
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingPain | Spine | Spine Surgery | Spine Fusion | Spine Surgery With Neuromonitoring | Spine Surgery With Motor Evoked Potential MonitoringUnited States
-
Rothman Institute OrthopaedicsEnrolling by invitation
-
Surgify Medical OyCompletedSurgery | Spine SurgeryFinland
-
King Khalid University HospitalNot yet recruitingSpine SurgerySaudi Arabia
-
Advanced Scanners Inc.Enrolling by invitation
-
GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la RechercheTerminated
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompleted
-
Albany Medical CollegeUnknown
-
Shahid Beheshti UniversityCompletedSpine SurgeryIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of California, San FranciscoTerminated
Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine
-
Bahria International HospitalCompleted
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingBupivacaine | Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine | Knee Orthopedic SurgeryEgypt
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedKnee Surgery | Pelvic Surgery | Spinal AneshtesiaIndonesia
-
Peking University First HospitalRecruitingDelirium | Dexmedetomidine | Postoperative Care | Intensive Care Unit | Older Patients | EsketamineChina
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...RecruitingAnalgesia | Pain, Acute | Nerve Block | Upper Extremity SurgeryCanada
-
Benha UniversityRecruitingDelirium - PostoperativeEgypt
-
Sichuan Academy of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingSepsis | Septic Shock
-
Peking University First HospitalRecruitingSurgery | General Anesthesia | Dexmedetomidine | Quality of Recovery | EsketamineChina
-
Younes Ahmed YounesNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownSpinal Anesthesia DurationEgypt