Developing and Testing the Effectiveness of a Skin Cancer Self-Detection Educational Program

January 25, 2026 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore

Protocol for Developing and Testing the Effectiveness of a Skin Cancer Self-Detection Educational Program: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Skin cancer is a significant public health concern, even in an Asian society like Singapore where it ranks among the top 10 cancers. This RCT tests the effectiveness of a skin cancer educational intervention to improve skin cancer outcomes among skin-of-color individuals, including the effects of gain versus loss framing.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Reducing skin cancer related morbidity and mortality involves two broad domains; (1) Identification and early detection of skin cancers and (2) Awareness and behavioral change to reduce modifiable risk factors like UV exposure. Regular self-examination and public education have been shown in RCTs to improve knowledge and identification of skin cancers. However most of these existing studies and the tools they utilise rely on Western-centric photographs and messaging, such as the 'ABCDE rule' for superficial spreading and nodular melanoma. These neglect skin cancers far more common in skin of colour population such as acral lentiginous melanomas, pigmented basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas.

In addition to improving detection, effective behavioural change strategies are needed to encourage protective practices such as regular sunscreen use. Message framing has gained interest as a behavioral change technique: gain-framed messages emphasize the benefits of adopting a behavior, while loss-framed messages highlight the negative consequences of not doing so. Although message framing is widely used in health communication, evidence of its effectiveness in promoting skin cancer-related behaviors is unclear.

Effectiveness of our proposed intervention can help to increase adoption of sun protective behaviours, improve detection rates of skin cancer and allow earlier medical intervention, hence reducing morbidity and mortality of skin cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals aged 16 and above
  • Able to read and converse in English
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Having the ability to use and interact with a web server or application.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Individuals who have cognitive impairment or decline to participate. There will be no exclusion criteria based on a previous history of skin cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control
Participants will fill up a baseline competency examination and questionnaire, and another at the 4 month mark. Access to the intervention for control group participants will only be provided after the 4-month questionnaire is completed.
Participants in the control group will gain access to the intervention websites after the 4-month questionnaire is completed.
Experimental: Intervention with gain framing
Participants will fill up a baseline competency examination and questionnaire. Afterwards, they will have access to a website with gain-framed messages emphasising benefits of adopting a behaviour. Thereafter, another competency questionnaire will be administered following completion of material.
This educational website will feature gain-framing messages, emphasizing the benefits of adopting a behavior, utilising positive language and analogies. The interventional domains are (1) Education on skin cancer risk factors and epidemiology, (2) UV Protection Advice, (3) Skin Self-Examination Techniques and (4) Differentiating benign vs malignant skin conditions.
Experimental: Intervention with loss framing
Participants will fill up a baseline competency examination and questionnaire. Afterwards, they will have access to a website with loss-framed messages highlighting consequences of failing to adopt a behaviour. Thereafter, another competency questionnaire will be administered following completion of material.
This educational website will feature loss-framing messages, highlight the consequences of failing to adopt a behavior, utilising negative language and analogies. The interventional domains are (1) Education on skin cancer risk factors and epidemiology, (2) UV Protection Advice, (3) Skin Self-Examination Techniques and (4) Differentiating benign vs malignant skin conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in competency scores
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention

Scores measured as percentage of correct questions answered. Range from 0% to 100% with higher score indicating higher ability to differentiate benign from malignant skin lesions.

Change in scores will be calculated and compared between

  1. Both intervention arms with the control group at 4 months, and
  2. Between gain framed and loss framed intervention arms at 4 months
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knowledge of skin cancer, sun protection and skin self-examination
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
20 Multiple Choice Questions created based on intervention website. Score range from 0 to 20, with a higher score indicate higher knowledge in risks of skin cancer, appropriate sunscreen use and features of cancerous lesions.
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
Attitudes toward carrying out sun protection behaviours
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
6 questions graded on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating better attitudes toward sun protection behaviours
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
Subjective norms, which refer to participants' perception of whether significant individuals in their lives would support sun protection behaviours
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
7 questions graded on a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a greater influence of others' perception on their sun protection behaviours
Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
Behavioural outcomes (sun protection behaviour and skin self-examination)
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention

Sun Exposure and Protection Index. 9 questions graded on a 5-point Likert scale assessing sun habits and sun protection behaviour. Lower scores indicate more optimal sun protection behaviours, with an additional adapted question.

11 additional questions regarding participants' sunscreen usage (e.g. type of sunscreen, frequency of reapplication), and skin-self examination, with a lower score indicating more optimal sun protection behaviours.

Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention
Intentions of participants toward carrying out skin cancer risk prevention strategies
Time Frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention

Sun Exposure and Protection Index (6 questions with an additional adapted question). Each given response score (0-4) are summed, with scores ranging from 0-24, with higher score indicating a low propensity to increase sun protection.

2 additional questions regarding participants' intentions of conducting a skin-self examination. 7 point Likert Scale (1-7), with higher score indicating higher intentions of conducting a skin-self examination.

Baseline, immediately post-intervention (for intervention arms), 4 months post-intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ellie Choi, MBBS, National University Hospital, Singapore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD shared includes de-identified demographics and measures.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD and supporting information will be available from the time of publication and for four years thereafter.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Deidentified individual participant data supporting the findings of this study will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Access will be granted on a case-by-case basis following review and approval of a data access proposal and completion of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skin Cancer

Clinical Trials on Wait-list Control

Subscribe