Treatment of Atypical Resistant Facial Pain

December 15, 2025 updated by: Alenka Spindler-Vesel

The Impact of Intravenous Administration of ACMP (Eptinezumab) on the Treatment of Atypical Resistant Facial Pain

Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms of facial pain.

Therefore, the hypothesis is that intravenous administration of ACMP will similarly disrupt central sensitization in facial pain as it does in migraine headaches.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Detailed Description

Facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region, which is not a migraine headache (e.g., cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome), is often very persistent and difficult to treat. Despite the use of all available treatment methods is often unsuccessful. Research findings suggest that, similar to the mechanisms of migraine headache, the increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in the mechanisms of facial pain. Trigeminal neuralgia has already been treated with intravenous administration of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (ACMP), such as eptinezumab.

In facial pain, as in chronic migraine, both peripheral and central nervous system sensitization can occur. Central sensitization is a poorly understood biological phenomenon, although some mechanisms are known. According to current knowledge and clinical experience, CGRP likely plays a central role in central sensitization that occurs in facial pain. It is known that in chronic migraine, the concentration of CGRP in the blood is elevated.

The peripheral mechanism of sensitization is not entirely clear, but it is likely that the peripheral part of the autonomic nervous system, specifically the parasympathetic system, plays an important role. The trigeminovascular reflex, a consequence of the autonomic segmental reflex, causes peripheral sensitization. Neurogenic inflammation also occurs. Neurogenic inflammation in the meninges further sensitizes the trigeminal nerve fibers.

CGRP is important for regulating physiological processes in the human body. It is also important for the sensitization of the peripheral nervous system, which can lead to central sensitization and create a vicious cycle. Central sensitization is a source of pro-inflammatory factors that promote neurogenic inflammation.

The level of CGRP in the body depends on its production and removal from the blood. ACMP effectively inactivate CGRP, thus reducing the number of migraine episodes and their intensity. Therefore, we hypothesize that intravenous administration of ACMP will similarly disrupt central sensitization in facial pain as it does in migraine headaches. Pharmacokinetic studies with eptinezumab have shown that intravenous administration of eptinezumab leads to an immediate peak concentration of ACMP, while subcutaneous administration reaches this effect only after several days. Since the biological availability of ACMP is significantly higher in the first few days, this may lead to the most effective reduction in CGRP influx and a probable clinical reduction in facial pain.

There are some attempts in the literature to treat cluster headaches with ACMP, but there is no data available for other syndromes.

The study will take place at the Chronic Pain Treatment Department of the Clinical Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care at the University Medical Centre (UKC) Ljubljana and will be designed as a multidisciplinary study (neurology and anesthesiology). 10 patients with facial pain in the trigeminal nerve region who do not have a migraine headache (e.g., cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, burning mouth syndrome) and who have not responded to conventional treatment approaches will be included. Each participant will be individually assessed and invited to participate in the study, followed by an explanatory conversation. After obtaining written consent, an intravenous line will be established, and standard monitoring (non-invasive blood pressure, pulse oximeter, oximetry) will be applied. A venous blood sample will be taken, followed by a 30-minute infusion of eptinezumab. A venous blood sample and the eptinezumab dose will be repeated after three months. CGRP levels, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and specific biomarkers will be monitored, before the and after three months of drug administration .

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

10

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000
        • Pain Therapy Clinic of University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pain Therapy Clinic of University Medical Centre Ljubljana

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • facial pain

Exclusion Criteria:

  • psychiatric disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MIDAS score
Time Frame: Change of baseline levels of MIDAS at 3 and 6 months after intervention.

The MIDAS (Migraine Disability Assessment) questionnaire measures how much migraines affect your everyday life and activities: work, household activities, school responsibilities, and leisure activities over the past 3 months.

The total score is obtained by summing the answers to the key questions (1-5).

  1. Low scores (0-10):

    Grade I and II- mild, ittle or no disability. Migraines has no or slight imapct on activities, but overall functioning is mostly preserved. Basic treatment and lifestyle adjustments are usually sufficient.

  2. Moderate scores (11-20):

    Grade III - moderate disability. Migraines significantly interfere with work and daily life; treatment adjustment may be needed.Consideration of preventive migraine therapy is advised.

  3. High scores (21+):

Grade IV - severe disability. Migraines greatly reduce the ability to perform daily activities; specialist evaluation Migraines significantly impair quality of life; evaluation and prevention are recommended.

Change of baseline levels of MIDAS at 3 and 6 months after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarkers of brain injury and inflammatory response
Time Frame: Change of baseline levels of proinflamatory cytokines and specific biomarkers at 3 and 6 months after intervention.
We will take blood samples for interleukin - 6, 8 and 10 (Il6, IL8, IL10), leptin, Nerve growth factor (NGF), S100 calcium-binding protein A8 (S100A8), Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and CGRP
Change of baseline levels of proinflamatory cytokines and specific biomarkers at 3 and 6 months after intervention.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 3, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 3, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0120-331/2024-2711-8

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Facial Pain

Clinical Trials on intravenous administration of ACMP

Subscribe