Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined With Upper Extremity Robot-Assisted Training on Upper Extremity Motor Functions in Stroke Patients

November 21, 2025 updated by: rustem mustafaoglu, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

The effects of stroke on the upper extremity are a common and significant cause of long-term disability, with 65% of patients reporting an inability to participate in daily activities with the affected upper extremity after 6 months. Robotic-assisted training (RAT) has been widely used in recent years to improve upper extremity function. RAT positively impacts upper extremity function and activities of daily living by inducing motor learning from intense, highly repetitive, and task-focused movements of the upper extremity. However, current, limited clinical solutions, including minimally invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), have not yielded promising results. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the combination of taVNS and RTA on motor impairment, upper extremity motor function, grip strength, daily living characteristics, and quality of life in individuals with stroke. Stroke medications were randomly assigned to RDE+taVNS (n=15) and RDE+sham taVNS (n=15). All participants will receive conventional treatment for 45 minutes per day, 3 days per week, for 5 weeks. One group will also receive RDE+taVNS treatment for 45 minutes per day, 2 days per week, for 5 weeks, while the other group will receive RDE+sha taVNS. Participants will be assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment, ARAT (Action Research Arm Test), and Box and Block Test as primary outcomes at baseline and after 5 weeks.

This project will contribute to the literature by demonstrating the effectiveness of taVNS, one of the most promising methods available. Furthermore, the results will prompt discussion on the applicability of the method not only to stroke patients but also to other disease groups. The unique value of this project is that it is the first study to investigate product improvements in taVNS systems.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Istanbul
      • Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
        • Recruiting
        • İstanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpaşa Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Büyükçekmece Yerleşkesi
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1) Individuals aged 18-70 years diagnosed with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke lasting longer than 6 months,
  • Moderate to severe upper extremity weakness (20-50 out of 66 on the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Motor Assessment Scale),
  • Ability to communicate and understand (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 23), and 4) Upper extremity spasticity of 2 or less on the Modified Ashworth Scale.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of any stimulation device, such as a pacemaker or other neurostimulator,
  • Presence of a medical or cognitive condition (personality disorder, anxiety, depression, etc.) that would prevent participants from participating in the study,
  • Receiving a Botox injection into the affected upper extremity at least 4 weeks prior,
  • Severe spasticity in the upper extremity (Modified Ashworth Scale ≥3),
  • Presence of dysphagia or aphasia,
  • Presence of cardiac problems such as atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, sick sinus syndrome, or atrioventricular block.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Robotics Assisted Education + taVNS
Conventional rehabilitation will be administered 3 days a week, 45 minutes per day, for 5 weeks. The combination of Upper Extremity Robotic-Assisted Training and Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation will be administered 2 days a week, 45 minutes per day, for 5 weeks.
Sham Comparator: Robotics Assisted Education + sham
Conventional rehabilitation will be administered 3 days a week, 45 minutes per day, for 5 weeks. The combination of Upper Extremity Robotic-Assisted Training and Sham Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation will be administered 2 days a week, 45 minutes per day, for 5 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Evaluation (FM-UE)
Time Frame: Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).
We will use the Fugl-Meyer Upper Motor Assessment score, which is the most sensitive for treatment outcomes in stroke patients presenting with unilateral paresis in the post-stroke period. It measures upper extremity use and impairment, measuring shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, finger, and reflex movements from proximal to distal, synergistic to extrinsic. The score ranges from 0 to 66 and consists of 33 items. 0-28 indicates severe motor impairment; 29-42 indicates moderate motor impairment; and 43-66 indicates mild motor impairment. Higher scores indicate better performance. The FM-UE consists of one component, each rated on a 3-point ordinal scale (0=not achieved, 1=partially contributed, 2=completely contributed). The minimum clinically meaningful change on the FM-UE for chronic stroke has been determined to be 4.25 to 7.25. Consistent with the literature, we define an improvement of at least 6 points or more as significant.
Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).
Box and Block Test (BBT)
Time Frame: Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).
The Box and Block Test is a manual dexterity test used to assess upper extremity motor function. It primarily assesses gross motor function. It is calculated by the number of 2.5 cm3 blocks thrown from one side to the other in 1 minute. A box and block test kit has been prepared to meet international standards.
Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Time Frame: Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).
The SIS 3.0 assesses function and quality of life based on subjective report in eight clinically important domains. It consists of two parts. The first part is the main scale of the IAS, which assesses multidimensional health-related quality of life (QOL) including strength, hand function, ADL/instrumental ADL, mobility, communication, emotion, memory/thinking, and social participation. It consists of 59 items, and each item is subjectively rated by stroke patients on a 5-point Likert-type scale according to their perceived difficulty with the item in the past week. The score for each domain is converted to a score out of 100, and the average scores for all domains are used to represent stroke patients' multidimensional health-related quality of life. The formula Domain Score = [(Average Item Score -1) / (5 -1) x 100] is used to convert each domain score. SIS 3.0 also includes assessment of post-stroke recovery using a 0-100 visual analog scale (0: no recovery, 100: complete recovery)
Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).
Hand Grip Strength
Time Frame: Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).
Grip strength on the affected side will be measured with a Jamar Hydraulic Dynamometer. The measurement protocol will be explained and demonstrated to the participant by an experienced physiotherapist. The dynamometer grip size will be adjusted to the participant's hand size, and the participant will be asked to squeeze the dynamometer for a practice trial. Anti-gravity support will be provided to maintain the position if necessary. Grip strength measurements with the Jamar dynamometer have proven to be highly valid and reliable, and normative values have been published.
Outcome measures will be assessed and recorded at baseline (assessment session) and after intervention (week 5).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rüstem Mustafaoğlu, associate professor, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Study Chair: Fatih Aykut Çavdar, Marmara University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Study Chair: Yusuf Açıkgöz, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Institute of Postgraduate Education
  • Study Chair: İpek Yeldan, Professor, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Study Director: Belgin Erhan, Professor, Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine, Department of International Medicine and Rehabilitation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Robotics Assisted Education + taVNS

Subscribe