Safety and Clinical Performance of the Freesolve Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold (RMS) System in Subjects With Coronary Artery Lesions (BIOMAG-III)

November 20, 2025 updated by: Teleflex

Safety and Clinical Performance of the Drug Eluting Resorbable Coronary Magnesium Scaffold System (Freesolve) in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Lesions in Native Coronary Arteries

The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of the Freesolve resorbable magnesium scaffold (RMS) in the treatment of subjects with up to two de novo lesions in native coronary arteries compared to the Xience coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) system

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The BIOMAG-III clinical trial is a prospective, international, multi-center, single-blinded, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial to compare the Freesolve Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold (Freesolve RMS) System with the Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent (Xience DES) System. with respect to Target Lesion Failure (TLF) rate at 12 months. Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion Freesolve to Xience. A total of up to 1859 subjects will be randomized at up to 120 total sites worldwide including North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Clinical follow-up will be conducted at 1, 6, and 12 months and at 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post-procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1859

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Clinical Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years of age
  2. Subject has provided written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee / Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site prior to the study related procedures
  3. Subject is eligible for PCI according to the applicable guidelines
  4. Subject is an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass surgery
  5. Subjects with stable or unstable angina pectoris, documented silent ischemia/abnormal physiologic testing or hemodynamically stable non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients without angiographic evidence of thrombus at target lesion

    Note: STEMI patients may be eligible for the study for treatment of selected non-culprit lesions, if:

    • Subject and target lesion(s) meet all inclusion and no exclusion criteria and consent occurs at least ≥ 72 hours after successful treatment of the culprit lesion(s) [lesion(s) causing the acute STEMI];
    • Subject is hemodynamically stable with documented declining cardiac biomarkers;
    • Target lesion(s) to be treated are not located in the culprit vessel(s) and are not culprit lesion(s)
  6. Subject is eligible for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus either clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor or ticlopidine
  7. Documented left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 30% within 6 months prior to or during the procedure (prior to randomization)
  8. Subject is willing and able to comply with protocol requirements, including completion of study visits for the duration of the study

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with a maximum of two single de novo target lesions each in separate native coronary arteries
  2. Target vessel must have a reference diameter between 2.5-4.2 mm by operator visual estimation, which may be assisted by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) / Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS) / Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
  3. Target lesion(s) must be ≤ 36 mm in length by operator visual estimation, which may be assisted by QCA / IVUS / OCT, (or < 20 mm for target lesion(s) to be treated with a study device < 3.0 mm in diameter) and must be amenable to treatment with a single study device
  4. Target lesion stenosis ≥ 50% and < 100% by operator visual estimation, which may be assisted by QCA / IVUS / OCT. Target lesion stenosis < 70% by visual estimation, should have clinical justification for treatment as per local standards.
  5. Target lesion must have a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≥ 1

Clinical Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is pregnant and/or breastfeeding or intends to become pregnant during the duration of the study
  2. Subject has clinical symptoms and/or electrocardiogram (ECG) changes consistent with STEMI < 72 hours prior to the index procedure Note: Hemodynamically stable non-STEMI (NSTEMI) subjects are eligible for study enrollment
  3. Subject has undergone prior PCI within the target vessel during the last 12 months prior to the index procedure or prior PCI within a non-target vessel < 72 hours prior to the index procedure
  4. Subject is on dialysis or has impaired renal function (serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL or 221 µmol/L, determined within 7 days prior to the index procedure)
  5. Subject has a known allergy to contrast medium that cannot be adequately premedicated, or any known allergy to aspirin, P2Y12 inhibitors, both heparin and bivalirudin, sirolimus, everolimus (or similar limus drugs), poly L-lactide, the scaffold material (magnesium, aluminum, tantalum), or Xience stent material (cobalt, chromium, tungsten, nickel, methacrylic polymer, and fluoropolymer)
  6. Subject is receiving oral or intravenous immunosuppressive therapy (inhaled steroids are permitted) or has known life-limiting immunosuppressive or autoimmune disease (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus; diabetes mellitus is permitted)
  7. Life expectancy less than 1 year
  8. Planned surgery or dental surgical procedure within 6 months after index procedure, unless DAPT can be maintained
  9. In the investigator's opinion subject will not be able to comply with the follow-up requirements
  10. Subjects under oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) prior to index procedure unless DAPT + OAC (i.e., triple therapy) can be maintained for a minimum of 1 month
  11. Subject has had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to the index procedure
  12. Subject with active bleeding disorder, active coagulopathy, or any other reason, who is ineligible for DAPT
  13. Subject is currently participating or plans to participate in another study with an investigational device or an investigational drug
  14. Subject has known severe aortic or mitral valve stenosis/insufficiency or has previously undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Target vessel has been previously treated and the target lesion is within 5 mm proximal or distal to the previously treated lesion
  2. Left main coronary artery disease
  3. Target lesion is totally occluded (100% stenosis)
  4. Thrombus in target vessel
  5. Future planned staged PCI either in target or non-target vessel
  6. Ostial target lesion within the left anterior descending (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), or right coronary artery (RCA) (within 5.0 mm of vessel origin)
  7. Target lesion involves a side branch ≥ 2.0 mm in diameter that requires a two-device strategy after pre-dilatation
  8. Target lesion is located in or supplied by an arterial or venous bypass graft
  9. Target lesion with excessive tortuosity proximal to or within the lesion based on visual estimation or heavily calcified target lesion which cannot be adequately pre-dilated by a non-compliant and/or cutting/scoring balloon as described in angiographic exclusion criteria 10
  10. Target lesion requires treatment with a device other than the non-compliant balloon and/or cutting/scoring balloon prior to scaffold/stent placement (including but not limited to atherectomy devices, intravascular lithotripsy, drug-coated balloons, etc.)
  11. Target vessel was treated with brachytherapy any time prior to the index procedure.
  12. Unsuccessful pre-dilatation, defined as residual stenosis > 20% (by visual estimation) and/or angiographic complications (e.g., distal embolization, side branch closure, flow-limiting dissections)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Xience DES
Intervention with a Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent System
Xience Everolimus Eluting Stent System
Experimental: Freesolve RMS
Intervention with a Freesolve Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold (RMS) System
Freesolve Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold (RMS) System, a drug-eluting balloon-expandable resorbable scaffold

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Target Lesion Failure (TLF) rate at 12 months post-index procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint is Target Lesion Failure (TLF) at 12 months, a composite of Cardiac Death, Target Vessel Q-wave or non-Q wave MI, or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR).
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure success
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)
Procedure success defined as achievement of < 30% final residual diameter stenosis [by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) or visual estimation] of the target lesion using the assigned study device only, without the occurrence of cardiac death, Q-wave or non-Q-wave MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)
Device Success
Time Frame: Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)

Device Success defined as a final residual diameter stenosis of < 30% by QCA or visual estimation, using the assigned device only with

  • successful delivery of the device to the target lesion, and
  • appropriate device deployment, and
  • successful removal of the delivery system
Hospital Discharge (6-24 hours post-index procedure)
Target lesion failure (TLF)
Time Frame: Time Frame: 1, 6 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
TLF is defined as a composite of Cardiac Death, Target Vessel Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 1, 6 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Target Vessel Failure (TVF), a composite of Cardiac Death, Target Vessel Q-wave or non-Q wave MI, or clinically driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR)
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Target vessel MI in accordance with the primary endpoint definitions for periprocedural and non-periprocedural MI
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Any MI (including non-target vessel territory)
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Clinically driven TLR
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Clinically driven TVR
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Scaffold/stent thrombosis (definite, definite/probable, probable) according to Academic Research Consortium (ARC-2) criteria for acute, sub-acute, late, very late and cumulative scaffold/stent thrombosis
Time Frame: 1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
1, 6, 12 months and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-index procedure
Powered Secondary Endpoint 1: TLF from 1-5 Years
Time Frame: 1 to 5 years post-index procedure
A powered secondary endpoint of cumulative TLF rates between 1 and 5 years post-procedure will be evaluated.
1 to 5 years post-index procedure
Powered Secondary Endpoint 2: TLF at 12 Months in the Diabetic Population
Time Frame: 12 months post-index procedure
A powered secondary endpoint of TLF at 12 months in the diabetic population will be evaluated.
12 months post-index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD sharing is planned at this time. This study evaluates an investigational device under an FDA IDE. The sponsor may consider sharing de-identified IPD under controlled access following completion of primary endpoint analysis and regulatory review. Summary results will be reported in scientific publications and public registries.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Freesolve RMS

Subscribe