Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the SAMANTA Questionnaire: A Step Toward Improved Diagnosis of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

November 25, 2025 updated by: Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed Abdel Raheem, Assiut University

Evaluating the Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Version of the SAMANTA Questionnaire: A Step Toward Improved Diagnosis of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) significantly impacts women's quality of life (QoL). However, despite the high prevalence of HMB, culturally adapted screening tools remain scarce in our locality. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Arabic version of SAMANTA questionnaire for non-pregnant women of reproductive age.

HMB can primarily be a consequence of structural or functional disturbances within the reproductive system, but it may also be linked to structural and functional ailments of other bodily systems (vascular abnormalities, malignancies, or coagulation disorders) With the exact global prevalence varies from 4% to 51% across different countries and racial groups, with estimates suggesting that approximately one-third of reproductive-age women experiences HMB .

HMB is defined as excessive menstrual blood loss which interferes with a woman's physical, social, emotional and/or material quality of life. It can occur alone or in combination with other symptoms. The term heavy menstrual bleeding has replaced the term menorrhagia.

The gold standard for the measurement of blood in sanitary products is the extraction of hematin using a 5% sodium hydroxide solution and the estimation of the alkaline hematin content by spectrophotometry .

This method is not feasible in clinical practice and has only been used in research studies.

HMB can cause iron-deficiency anemia, which is among the leading causes of years lived with disability in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is also associated with a range of adverse functional outcomes, including lower productivity and income earning, reduced ability to perform daily activities, and limitations on social life and relationships.

Recent research in the area of HMB has recognized the importance of measuring "patient experience" as an outcome and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence from the UK suggests that any intervention for HMB should aim to improve quality of life rather than focusing on menstrual blood loss .

For women with HMB early and accurate diagnosis is important to prevent its negative consequences. However, in low resource settings, facilities are not always available. For this reason, a cheap, simple to use tool to identify women with HMB and its impact on their quality of life is needed.

In the present study, we test the ability of the Arabic version of SAMANTA-Q as a simple tool to identify women with HMB.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Reproductive age women, from 15 to 45 years old were eligible for the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women, from 15 to 45 years old
  • Reproductive age women

Exclusion Criteria:

Women with amenorrhea. Postmenopausal women. Pregnant women. Women who had given birth within the previous 6 months. Women with mental illness, or inability to make decisions or follow instructions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Group A
Reproductive age women, from 15 to 45 years old with heavy Menstrual Bleeding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
accuracy of Arabic Version of the SAMANTA Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 25, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

3
Subscribe