- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07278271
Decision-Making in Labor Admission Using Transperineal Ultrasound vs. Vaginal Examination
December 10, 2025 updated by: Marcos Javier Cuerva González, Hospital Universitario La Paz
Toma de Decisiones en la Admisión Hospitalaria al Parto Con Ecografía Transperineal vs. Tacto Vaginal: Estudio Aleatorizado Controlado
This clinical trial aims to determine whether transperineal ultrasound (a perineal external scan) can improve decision-making for hospital admission in term pregnant women in labor compared to traditional vaginal examination.
Term pregnant women (>37 weeks) presenting with contractions at the emergency department will be randomly assigned to undergo either a transperineal ultrasound or a vaginal examination upon arrival.
The study will evaluate whether ultrasound-based assessment reduces the rate of labor inductions and decreases patient discomfort during the admission evaluation.
All participants will receive standard clinical evaluation and follow-up according to the assigned method, report discomfort levels using a standardized scale, and have labor outcomes recorded - including induction, oxytocin use, time to delivery, and mode of delivery -, to determine whether ultrasound improves clinical decision-making and maternal comfort.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial is designed to evaluate whether transperineal ultrasound provides a more effective and less discomforting method than standard vaginal examination for decision-making regarding hospital admission in term pregnant women presenting with contractions.
Vaginal examination remains the standard approach for assessing labor progression but is known to be subjective, poorly reproducible, and frequently uncomfortable for patients.
In contrast, transperineal ultrasound offers objective and reproducible parameters such as cervical dilation, fetal head station, angle of progression, and head-perineum distance.
Incorporating these measurements into the clinical evaluation may optimize admission criteria, reduce unnecessary hospitalizations, and lower the rate of labor inductions.
After obtaining informed consent, eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a transperineal ultrasound group or a standard vaginal examination group.
In the ultrasound group, hospital admission will be recommended when cervical dilation is ≥3 cm or the angle of progression exceeds 120°, in the presence of regular uterine contractions.
In the vaginal examination group, admission will be recommended when cervical dilation is ≥4 cm with regular contractions.
Maternal discomfort during the evaluation will be assessed on a 0-10 numerical scale, and all labor outcomes and interventions will be recorded in standardized case report forms.
A total of 170 participants (85 per group) will be enrolled to detect an 18% difference in labor induction rates with 80% power and a 95% confidence level.
Statistical analyses will include descriptive and comparative methods (Chi-square, t-test, or non-parametric equivalents), with significance defined as p<0.05.
The study will adhere to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and comply with applicable data protection regulations, including the Spanish Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos (Organic Law on Data Protection, LOPD) and the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).All participants will provide written informed consent prior to inclusion, and all data will be anonymized.
The protocol has received approval from the institutional ethics committee.
This trial builds upon prior observational findings demonstrating high agreement between ultrasound-based and traditional methods for assessing labor progression.
By generating high-level evidence, it aims to support the implementation of transperineal ultrasound in labor triage protocols, improving the accuracy of clinical decision-making, enhancing maternal comfort, and contributing to better obstetric outcomes.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
170
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Madrid
-
Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28046
- Recruiting
- Hospital Universitario La Paz
-
Contact:
- Marcos Javier Cuerva González, PhD
- Phone Number: 0034677026551
- Email: marcosj.cuerva@salud.madrid.org
-
Contact:
- Jose Luis Bartha Rasero, Prof. Dr. José Luis Bartha, MD
- Phone Number: 0034917277008
-
Principal Investigator:
- Marcos Javier Cuerva González, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women aged 18 to 45 years
- Singleton pregnancy
- Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks (term pregnancy)
- Spontaneous uterine contractions at the time of presentation to the emergency department
- Cephalic presentation
- Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Premature rupture of membranes (PROM)
- Multiple gestation
- Known high-risk pregnancy (e.g., preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, insulin-dependent diabetes)
- Previous cesarean delivery
- Breech or other non-cephalic presentation
- Elective cesarean section planned or requested
- Refusal to undergo vaginal delivery
- Inability or unwillingness to comply with the study protocol
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Transperineal Ultrasound
Participants in this arm will undergo transperineal ultrasound to assess cervical dilatation, angle of progression (AOP), fetal head position, and head-perineum distance (HPD).
Hospital admission will be based on predefined sonographic criteria (e.g., dilation ≥3 cm or angle of progression >120° plus regular uterine contractions).
|
Transperineal ultrasound will be performed to assess cervical dilatation, angle of progression, fetal head position, and head-perineum distance.
Admission decisions will be made based on predefined sonographic thresholds.
|
|
Active Comparator: Vaginal Examination
Participants in this arm will undergo standard digital vaginal examination.
Hospital admission will be based on cervical dilation ≥4 cm and regular uterine contractions, following the routine clinical protocol.
|
Standard digital vaginal examination will be conducted to assess cervical dilatation.
Admission decisions will follow institutional protocol (≥4 cm dilation with regular contractions).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Labor Induction
Time Frame: From hospital admission decision to delivery
|
Proportion of participants who undergo labor induction if admitted after evaluation by transperineal ultrasound or vaginal examination.
|
From hospital admission decision to delivery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use of Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation
Time Frame: During labor (up to delivery)
|
Proportion of participants who receive oxytocin for augmentation of labor following initial triage evaluation.
|
During labor (up to delivery)
|
|
Time from Admission to Delivery
Time Frame: From hospital admission to time of delivery
|
From hospital admission to time of delivery
|
|
|
Mode of Delivery (as recorded in the medical record)
Time Frame: At birth
|
Mode of delivery will be recorded from the medical record and categorized as spontaneous vaginal delivery, assisted vaginal delivery (instrumental), or cesarean section.
|
At birth
|
|
Number of Vaginal Examinations Performed
Time Frame: From hospital admission for labor to delivery
|
From hospital admission for labor to delivery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 29, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 10, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
December 12, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 12, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 10, 2025
Last Verified
December 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI-4053
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this study (after de-identification) will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request.
This will include data on primary and secondary outcomes.
Data will be shared after publication of the main results and with approval from the principal investigator and institutional ethics committee.
Requests should be directed to Dr. Marcos J. Cuerva at marcosj.cuerva@salud.madrid.org
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Labor Active Dilated Cm
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedLabor Active Dilated CmEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingNormal Pregnancy | Labor Active Dilated Cm
-
Arrowhead Regional Medical CenterCompletedLabor | Labor Complication | Labor Delivery | Labor Dystocia | Uterine Contraction | Labor Active Dilated Cm | Labor DurationUnited States
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedPregnancy | No Pregnancy Complications | Cervical Dilatation of 4-6 cm (Early Active Phase) | MuslimTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterMelissa March; Alison Bauer; Gaetan Pettigrew; Daisy Hassani; Celina CunananWithdrawnEffect of Carbohydrate Ingestion During Active Labor
-
Sheba Medical CenterTel Aviv UniversityUnknownHealth Preterm Infants With no Active Disease | Human Milk Nutrition | Incubator StayIsrael
-
Linkoeping UniversityCompletedMaternal Obesity During Childbirth | Labor; Arrested Active PhaseSweden
Clinical Trials on Transperineal Ultrasound
-
Singapore General HospitalRecruitingPhysiotherapy | Pelvic Floor Dysfunction | Postpartum | Pelvic Floor Health After Childbirth | Pelvic Floor Muscle Training | Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise | Pelvic Floor Disorder | Physiotherapy Specialty | Pelvic Floor, Obstetric | Transperineal Ultrasound | Biofeedback TherapySingapore
-
H. James Wallace, MDElekta LimitedCompleted
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedUrodynamic Stress Incontinence
-
Linkoeping UniversityCompletedObesity | Pregnancy
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingVaginal Laxity
-
St. Olavs HospitalWithdrawnChildbirth Problems | Pelvic Floor Dyssynergia | Pelvic Floor; RuptureNorway
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedPreterm Premature Rupture of Membrane | PPROMEgypt
-
Sanliurfa Mehmet Akif Inan Education and Research...CompletedIntrapartum | Transperineal UltrasoundTurkey
-
Sehit Prof. Dr. Ilhan Varank Sancaktepe Training...Active, not recruitingProgression | Ultrasound Therapy; Complications | Labour;Obstructed | Delivery Problem for FetusTurkey
-
Kaplan Medical CenterCompletedChorioamnionitis | Fever | Pregnancy Related | Labor ComplicationIsrael