Neural Mechanisms of Fatigue in Post-Acute Sequela of SARS-CoV-2

Motivated Decision-Making and Performance

This proposal aims to understand the neurobiological mechanisms of fatigue in individuals with Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection (PASC). This knowledge will eventually provide candidate mechanisms to target with pharmacological intervention and inform rehabilitative care for those individuals suffering from symptoms of fatigue in PASC.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Vikram Chib, PhD

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 75 years old.
  • Have received a clinical diagnosis of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC)/long COVID syndrome using the criteria specified by Thaweethai, et al., 2023 (JAMA). This symptom checklist provides a score based on the number and severity of symptoms. An individual with a score >12 is classified as having PASC.
  • Currently experiencing Fatigue/Brain Fog as assessed with the Post-COVID symptom checklist and the PedsQL questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neurological disorders including, but not limited to, stroke, head injury, epilepsy, seizures, brain tumors, brain surgery, Parkinson's Disease, or any other neuromuscular disease (self-report).
  • Diagnosed history of severe psychiatric diseases such as depression and schizophrenia (self-report).
  • Congestive heart failure.
  • Peripheral artery disease with claudication.
  • Cancer.
  • Pulmonary or renal failure.
  • Unstable angina.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (more than 190/110 mmHg).
  • Severe aphasia.
  • Orthopedic or pain conditions.
  • Have had exposure to metal or metal implants, due to the hazardous effects of the magnetic field.
  • If on immunomodulatory therapy, they must have been on that therapy for at least 6 months before the start of the study.

Healthy age- and sex-matched controls for PASC - Exclusion criteria: Participants with a history of any of the following will be excluded from the study:

  • Hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
  • Neurological disorders including, but not limited to, stroke, head injury, epilepsy, seizures, brain tumors, brain surgery, Parkinson's Disease, or any other neuromuscular disease (self-report).
  • Diagnosed history of severe psychiatric diseases such as depression and schizophrenia (self-report).
  • Congestive heart failure.
  • Peripheral artery disease with claudication.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PASC Participants - Physical Fatigue Task
Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.
Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.
Experimental: Control Participants - Physical Fatigue Task
Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.
Participants will perform a physically demanding task (grip force exertion task) repeatedly to induce physical fatigue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between PASC and HC - difference in mean Assessment Error
Time Frame: Baseline, during experimental protocol.
The difference between the level of effort rated by participants, and their average grip force exerted on a grip force dynamometer. Compared between PASC and HC.
Baseline, during experimental protocol.
Comparing between PASC and HC - difference in BBB permeability
Time Frame: Baseline, during MRI acquisition.
Collected from and MRI sequence designed to measure BBB permeability.
Baseline, during MRI acquisition.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Regions of the brain that are sensitive to Assessment error as a function of disease state
Time Frame: Baseline, during experimental protocol.
We will examine an fMRI contrast, at the time of effort assessment, between HC and PASC groups. This contrast will examine percent signal change in brain activity.
Baseline, during experimental protocol.
The modulatory effect of BBB permeability on the relationship between Neural Activity and Effort Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline, during experimental protocol and MRI aquisition.
We will create a structural equation model that includes BBB permeability, fMRI activity, effort assessment behavior, and disease state (PASC/HC).
Baseline, during experimental protocol and MRI aquisition.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in momentary subjective fatigue ratings
Time Frame: Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
Measures of subjective fatigue will be collected on self report scale that ranges from 'not fatigued at all' to 'very fatigued'.
Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in Mean Acceptance Rate of Risky Effort Options between rested/baseline and fatigue choices
Time Frame: Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
Proportion of decisions in which inviduals choice to accept a risky effort opitions over a sure effort option.
Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
Comparing between PASC and HC - Regions of the brain encoding a difference in effort cost between rested/baseline and fatigue choices
Time Frame: Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
We will examine a contrast between chosen effort value pre versus post fatigue, between the HC and PASC groups. This contrast will examine percent signal change in brain activity.
Baseline and during fatiguing exertions in the experimental protocol.
The modulatory effect of BBB permeability on the relationship between Neural Activity and change effort-based decision-making
Time Frame: Baseline, fatigueing exertion, and during experimental protocol and MRI aquisition
We will create a structural equation model that includes BBB permeability, fMRI activity, change in effort-based decision-making, and disease state (PASC/HC).
Baseline, fatigueing exertion, and during experimental protocol and MRI aquisition
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in mean assessment error as a function of time
Time Frame: Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
The difference between the level of effort rated by participants, and their average grip force exerted on a grip force dynamometer. Compared between PASC and HC.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Comparing between PASC and HC - Difference in momentary subjective fatigue ratings as a function of time
Time Frame: Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Measures of subjective fatigue will be collected on self report scale that ranges from 'not fatigued at all' to 'very fatigued'.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Comparing between PASC and HC - difference in BBB permeability as a function of time
Time Frame: Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Collected from and MRI sequence designed to measure BBB permeability.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
Comparing between PASC and HC - Regions of the brain that are sensitive to Assessment error as a function of disease state and time
Time Frame: Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12
We will examine a contrast, at the time of effort assessment, between HC and PASC groups, and use time as a covariate. This contrast will examine percent signal change in brain activity.
Data collections at months 0, 3, 6, 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vikram Chib, PhD, Johns Hopkins University; Kennedy Krieger Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Physical Fatigue

Subscribe