- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07284719
MRgFUS for Parkinson's Tremor
Predictors and Mechanisms of Tremor Relapse After MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Parkinson's Disease
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 2% of people over 65 years of age. The pathological hallmark of PD is the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, and the cardinal clinical features are bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor.
Dopaminergic dysfunction within the striatum closely correlates with the severity of bradykinesia and rigidity. However, this relationship is less consistent for resting tremor, which likely reflects the involvement of additional neurotransmitter systems. While dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) is mostly effective for bradykinesia and rigidity, the effect on resting tremor is more variable.
Positron emission tomography (PET) findings indicate that tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (TDPD), compared with the akinetic-rigid subtype, is characterized by relatively greater serotonergic than dopaminergic dysfunction. Previous studies have used the raphe nuclei and putamen as markers of serotonergic and dopaminergic terminal integrity, respectively. The interindividual relationship between serotonergic and dopaminergic terminal integrity can thus be expressed by the raphe/putamen specific binding ratio. Reduced integrity of the serotonergic system relative to dopaminergic integrity (low raphe/putamen ratio) has been associated with higher tremor amplitude and may partly account for the limited responsiveness of tremor to DRT compared with bradykinesia and rigidity.
Medical-refractory tremor is a clinical challenge and highlights the need for non-pharmacological treatment.
Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) is an incisionless treatment for both essential tremor and PD tremor. The procedure creates a focal lesion in the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus. MRgFUSth has been shown to effectively reduce PD tremor and to have a favorable safety profile. However, approximately 20% of treated patients experience tremor relapse within one to two years. The prevalence and causes of relapse are not well defined.
Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that underlying differences in neurochemical and neuronal network integrity explain the variability in long-term response and relapse of tremor following MRgFUSth in PD.
Specifically, the expectation is that dopamine-resistant patients with lower raphe/putamen ratios will show more durable tremor control. In contrast, dopamine-responsive patients with higher raphe/putamen ratios may be more prone to relapse as nigrostriatal degeneration progresses.
Objective To increase understanding of tremor relapse following MRgFUSth in PD and to identify clinical and imaging biomarkers associated with sustained tremor control, thereby supporting improved patient selection and optimized therapeutic outcomes.
Study design This is a prospective, interventional cohort study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital.
Eligible participants are 50-80 years old and have established diagnosis of PD and tremor unsatisfactory controlled with conventional standard doses of dopamine replacement therapy.
All screened patients undergo a standardized levodopa test using an oral suprathreshold levodopa/carbidopa dose (300/75 mg) to classify dopaminergic responsiveness of tremor.
The test is performed after ≥8 hours of dopaminergic medication withdrawal ("OFF" state). The Movement Disorder Society version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III will be administered before and after levodopa/carbidopa administration.
A total of 20 participants will be enrolled, equally divided into two predefined groups based on the outcomes of the levodopa test:
- Dopamine-responsive group (n=10) >30% improvement in MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscore (items 3.15-18)
- Dopamine-resistant group (n=10) ≤30% improvement in MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscore
Although all enrolled participants have tremor insufficiently controlled by their usual dopaminergic treatment, some demonstrate marked tremor improvement under the standardized suprathreshold levodopa/carbidopa challenge ('dopamine-responsive'), while others do not ('dopamine-resistant'). These classifications apply solely to the high-dose test conditions and do not reflect real-world treatment effectiveness
A ¹⁸F-DOPA PET (along with an MRI for PET co-registration) will be performed at baseline to further characterize individual serotonergic and dopaminergic specific binding ratios (raphe/putamen ratio) in these patients. A repeat ¹⁸F-DOPA PET will be performed 18 months after MRgFUSth to assess progression of nigrostriatal and/or serotonergic dysfunctions.
All participants will receive unilateral MRgFUSth targeting the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus contralateral to the most affected limb.
The procedure is performed using the Exablate Neuro 4000 system (Insightec Ltd.) under MR guidance within its CE-marked clinical indication.
Clinical assessment will be performed at baseline (pre-MRgFUSth) and 24 hours, 6, 12, 18 and 24 month post-MRgFUSth.
Assessment battery:
- MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV
- Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM)
- Mini-BESTest, 20-meter walk test and Timed Up and Go (TUG) for balance and gait
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change (PGIC, CGI-I)
- Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires
- Neuropsychological evaluations
Clinical assessment of FTM part A and B and MDS-UPDS part III will be video recorded.
MDS UPDRS tremor scores (item 3.15-3.18) and FTM part A and B of upper extremities will be rated by a movement disorder specialist blinded to dopamine-responsiveness status of the participant.
Safety and ethics Adverse events, neurological symptoms, and medication adjustments will be recorded at each time point.
Safety monitoring is coordinated by the study's clinical research coordinator, and all events will be reviewed by the investigator team.
All participants will provide written informed consent before enrollment. Data will be recorded in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) hosted by Aarhus University Hospital, where participant data will be anonymized by randomly assigned project ID. Only the clinical investigators will have access to the data. Data handling complies with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Andreas N Glud, Associate Professor
- Phone Number: +4523882213
- Email: andglu@rm.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
- Recruiting
- Aarhus University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Morten L Nørholt, MD
- Phone Number: +78450000
- Email: moln@clin.au.dk
-
Contact:
- Phone Number: +78450000
- Email: au454377@uni.au.dk
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Morten L Norholt, MD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Andreas N Glud, Associate Professor
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Established diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
- Tremor not manageable with optimal medication
- Clinical Indication for MRgFUSth
- Able to understand study requirements and provide consent
- HOEHN and YAHR <3
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dementia or severe cognitive impairment
- The presence of another significant neurological/psychiatric disorder or significant disease
- Severe psychopathology, not medically managed
- Poor balance and gait function based on neurological examination
- Epilepsy
- Active drug abuse
- History of stroke or structural lesions on MRI that could interfere with image analysis.
- Contraindications for MRI
- Cardiac pacemaker
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding
- Claustrophobia
- Patients unable to lie on the back for 2-4 hours in the MR-scanner-setting
- Patients who do not want information about findings of unknown disease during the trial
- SDR (Skull density rate) lower than 0.35
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) in Parkinson's tremor
MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in participants with Parkinson's and tremor.
Baseline and follow-up assessments for 24 months
|
MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Sustained tremor reduction at 24 months
Time Frame: From pre-intervention baseline and 24 months after intervention
|
Number of participants with sustained tremor reduction (defined as ≥50% improvement from pre-surgical baseline) at 24 months in each group. Tremor will be evaluated using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points, lower scores indicate better outcome) The main analysis will compare the number of patients with sustained tremor control at 24 months between the Dopamine-responsive and the Dopamine-resistant group |
From pre-intervention baseline and 24 months after intervention
|
|
Mean Tremor Reduction (%)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24-months after intervention
|
Mean percent change from pre-surgical baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18
(0-40 points, lower scores indicate better outcome) at each follow-up visit (24 hours, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) in the Dopamine-responsive and Dopamine-resistant groups.
|
Pre-intervention baseline until 24-months after intervention
|
|
Time to relapse of tremor
Time Frame: From intervention until 24-month after intervention
|
Proportion of participants who have relapse of tremor at any post-operative follow-up over 24 months in the Dopamine-responsive and Dopamine-resistant groups. Main analysis will evaluate the time points of which relapse occur and differences between the groups Relapse is defined as a decline of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points) to <50% improvement relative to the pre-surgical baseline |
From intervention until 24-month after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Baseline until 24 months post-intervention
|
Incidence, type, and severity of treatment-related and non-treatment-related adverse events recorded during the procedure, at 24 hours, and at each follow-up visit. Baseline neurological deficits are documented preoperatively and are not reclassified as adverse events unless worsened post-procedure. |
Baseline until 24 months post-intervention
|
|
Change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) from baseline to 24 months.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) from baseline to 24 months.
|
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
|
Troublesome Tremor Relapse (PGIC-Defined)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Proportion of participants reporting their tremor as "much worse" or "very much worse" compared with the previous visit on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale (ranging from "very much better" to "very much worse"). Reflects clinically meaningful recurrence of tremor from the patient perspective. |
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
|
Changes in Activity of daily living
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Comparison of changes in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part II (Activities of Daily Living; range 0-52, lower scores indicate better functioning) from baseline through 24 month of follow-up between the two groups.
|
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
|
Change in quality-of-life (QoL) scores from baseline to 24 months
Time Frame: Baseline until 24 month post-intervention
|
Change of QoL at 24 month compared to baseline.
Comparison of differences between the two groups
|
Baseline until 24 month post-intervention
|
|
Change in cognitive performance (MoCA score) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Change in cognitive performance from baseline to 24 months measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; range 0-30, where higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning).
|
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Association between baseline Raphe/Putamen specific binding ratio (SBR) and sustained tremor control at 24 months
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Baseline raphe/putamen ratio will be derived from ¹⁸F-DOPA PET as an index of relative serotonergic-to-dopaminergic terminal integrity. The association between baseline raphe/putamen ratio and sustained tremor control at 24 months will be analyzed. |
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
|
Association between baseline levodopa-test outcomes and sustained tremor control at 24 months
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
The association between baseline levodopa-test responsiveness and sustained tremor control at 24 months will be analyzed.
|
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Synucleinopathies
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Disease Attributes
- Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Movement Disorders
- Parkinsonian Disorders
- Basal Ganglia Diseases
- Dyskinesias
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Recurrence
- Parkinson Disease
- Tremor
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16-0302-48
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tremor
-
Emory UniversityCompletedEssential Tremor | Essential Vocal Tremor | Essential Voice Tremor | Voice Tremor | Vocal TremorUnited States
-
KU LeuvenCompleted
-
CND Life SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)RecruitingEssential Tremor | Essential Tremor-plus | Essential Tremor, Movement DisordersUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedUpper Limb Tremor InvalidatingFrance
-
KU LeuvenCompleted
-
Syracuse UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)CompletedEssential Voice Tremor | Voice Tremor | Vocal Tremor | Essential Tremor of VoiceUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedEssential Tremor | Tremor | Action Tremor | Tremor, LimbUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...CompletedPrimary Orthostatic TremorFrance
-
University of MinnesotaRecruitingEssential Tremor | Upper Extremity Essential TremorUnited States
-
ES Therapeutics Australia Pty LtdRecruitingTremor, EssentialCanada
Clinical Trials on MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy
-
Rambam Health Care CampusUnknownMultiple Sclerosis
-
University Health Network, TorontoUniversité de SherbrookeActive, not recruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompletedUterine FibroidsUnited States
-
meishanshanBeijing GoBroad HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreFocused Ultrasound FoundationSuspended
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreCompletedMajor Depressive DisorderCanada
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalNot yet recruitingParkinson Disease | Magnetic Resonance ImagingChina
-
University Health Network, TorontoCanadian Cancer Society (CCS); Brain CanadaActive, not recruitingBrain Neoplasms | Liquid BiopsyCanada
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalRecruiting