MRgFUS for Parkinson's Tremor

January 5, 2026 updated by: Andreas Nørgaard Glud, Aarhus University Hospital

Predictors and Mechanisms of Tremor Relapse After MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy in Parkinson's Disease

This study investigates magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) for people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and tremor not responding to conventional standard doses of dopamine replacement therapy. The aim is to identify clinical and imaging biomarkers predictive of sustained tremor control up to 24 months after MRgFUSth treatment. Participants will undergo a suprathreshold levodopa test and ¹⁸F-DOPA PET imaging to evaluate dopaminergic and serotonergic involvement in tremor. All participants will receive MRgFUSth and be followed for 24 months with standardized clinical, cognitive, and quality-of-life assessments. The study seeks to improve understanding the possible mechanisms of tremor relapse and inform patient selection for MRgFUSth in PD.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Background

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder worldwide, affecting approximately 2% of people over 65 years of age. The pathological hallmark of PD is the progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, and the cardinal clinical features are bradykinesia, rigidity, and resting tremor.

Dopaminergic dysfunction within the striatum closely correlates with the severity of bradykinesia and rigidity. However, this relationship is less consistent for resting tremor, which likely reflects the involvement of additional neurotransmitter systems. While dopamine replacement therapy (DRT) is mostly effective for bradykinesia and rigidity, the effect on resting tremor is more variable.

Positron emission tomography (PET) findings indicate that tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease (TDPD), compared with the akinetic-rigid subtype, is characterized by relatively greater serotonergic than dopaminergic dysfunction. Previous studies have used the raphe nuclei and putamen as markers of serotonergic and dopaminergic terminal integrity, respectively. The interindividual relationship between serotonergic and dopaminergic terminal integrity can thus be expressed by the raphe/putamen specific binding ratio. Reduced integrity of the serotonergic system relative to dopaminergic integrity (low raphe/putamen ratio) has been associated with higher tremor amplitude and may partly account for the limited responsiveness of tremor to DRT compared with bradykinesia and rigidity.

Medical-refractory tremor is a clinical challenge and highlights the need for non-pharmacological treatment.

Magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) is an incisionless treatment for both essential tremor and PD tremor. The procedure creates a focal lesion in the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus of the thalamus. MRgFUSth has been shown to effectively reduce PD tremor and to have a favorable safety profile. However, approximately 20% of treated patients experience tremor relapse within one to two years. The prevalence and causes of relapse are not well defined.

Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that underlying differences in neurochemical and neuronal network integrity explain the variability in long-term response and relapse of tremor following MRgFUSth in PD.

Specifically, the expectation is that dopamine-resistant patients with lower raphe/putamen ratios will show more durable tremor control. In contrast, dopamine-responsive patients with higher raphe/putamen ratios may be more prone to relapse as nigrostriatal degeneration progresses.

Objective To increase understanding of tremor relapse following MRgFUSth in PD and to identify clinical and imaging biomarkers associated with sustained tremor control, thereby supporting improved patient selection and optimized therapeutic outcomes.

Study design This is a prospective, interventional cohort study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital.

Eligible participants are 50-80 years old and have established diagnosis of PD and tremor unsatisfactory controlled with conventional standard doses of dopamine replacement therapy.

All screened patients undergo a standardized levodopa test using an oral suprathreshold levodopa/carbidopa dose (300/75 mg) to classify dopaminergic responsiveness of tremor.

The test is performed after ≥8 hours of dopaminergic medication withdrawal ("OFF" state). The Movement Disorder Society version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III will be administered before and after levodopa/carbidopa administration.

A total of 20 participants will be enrolled, equally divided into two predefined groups based on the outcomes of the levodopa test:

  • Dopamine-responsive group (n=10) >30% improvement in MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscore (items 3.15-18)
  • Dopamine-resistant group (n=10) ≤30% improvement in MDS-UPDRS III tremor subscore

Although all enrolled participants have tremor insufficiently controlled by their usual dopaminergic treatment, some demonstrate marked tremor improvement under the standardized suprathreshold levodopa/carbidopa challenge ('dopamine-responsive'), while others do not ('dopamine-resistant'). These classifications apply solely to the high-dose test conditions and do not reflect real-world treatment effectiveness

A ¹⁸F-DOPA PET (along with an MRI for PET co-registration) will be performed at baseline to further characterize individual serotonergic and dopaminergic specific binding ratios (raphe/putamen ratio) in these patients. A repeat ¹⁸F-DOPA PET will be performed 18 months after MRgFUSth to assess progression of nigrostriatal and/or serotonergic dysfunctions.

All participants will receive unilateral MRgFUSth targeting the ventral intermediate (VIM) nucleus contralateral to the most affected limb.

The procedure is performed using the Exablate Neuro 4000 system (Insightec Ltd.) under MR guidance within its CE-marked clinical indication.

Clinical assessment will be performed at baseline (pre-MRgFUSth) and 24 hours, 6, 12, 18 and 24 month post-MRgFUSth.

Assessment battery:

  • MDS-UPDRS Parts I-IV
  • Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale (FTM)
  • Mini-BESTest, 20-meter walk test and Timed Up and Go (TUG) for balance and gait
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • Patient and Clinician Global Impression of Change (PGIC, CGI-I)
  • Quality of life (QoL) questionnaires
  • Neuropsychological evaluations

Clinical assessment of FTM part A and B and MDS-UPDS part III will be video recorded.

MDS UPDRS tremor scores (item 3.15-3.18) and FTM part A and B of upper extremities will be rated by a movement disorder specialist blinded to dopamine-responsiveness status of the participant.

Safety and ethics Adverse events, neurological symptoms, and medication adjustments will be recorded at each time point.

Safety monitoring is coordinated by the study's clinical research coordinator, and all events will be reviewed by the investigator team.

All participants will provide written informed consent before enrollment. Data will be recorded in REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) hosted by Aarhus University Hospital, where participant data will be anonymized by randomly assigned project ID. Only the clinical investigators will have access to the data. Data handling complies with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Danish Data Protection Act.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Andreas N Glud, Associate Professor
  • Phone Number: +4523882213
  • Email: andglu@rm.dk

Study Locations

      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Recruiting
        • Aarhus University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Morten L Norholt, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andreas N Glud, Associate Professor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Established diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • Tremor not manageable with optimal medication
  • Clinical Indication for MRgFUSth
  • Able to understand study requirements and provide consent
  • HOEHN and YAHR <3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Dementia or severe cognitive impairment
  • The presence of another significant neurological/psychiatric disorder or significant disease
  • Severe psychopathology, not medically managed
  • Poor balance and gait function based on neurological examination
  • Epilepsy
  • Active drug abuse
  • History of stroke or structural lesions on MRI that could interfere with image analysis.
  • Contraindications for MRI
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Claustrophobia
  • Patients unable to lie on the back for 2-4 hours in the MR-scanner-setting
  • Patients who do not want information about findings of unknown disease during the trial
  • SDR (Skull density rate) lower than 0.35

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy (MRgFUSth) in Parkinson's tremor
MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus in participants with Parkinson's and tremor. Baseline and follow-up assessments for 24 months
MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy of the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained tremor reduction at 24 months
Time Frame: From pre-intervention baseline and 24 months after intervention

Number of participants with sustained tremor reduction (defined as ≥50% improvement from pre-surgical baseline) at 24 months in each group.

Tremor will be evaluated using the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points, lower scores indicate better outcome) The main analysis will compare the number of patients with sustained tremor control at 24 months between the Dopamine-responsive and the Dopamine-resistant group

From pre-intervention baseline and 24 months after intervention
Mean Tremor Reduction (%)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24-months after intervention
Mean percent change from pre-surgical baseline in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points, lower scores indicate better outcome) at each follow-up visit (24 hours, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) in the Dopamine-responsive and Dopamine-resistant groups.
Pre-intervention baseline until 24-months after intervention
Time to relapse of tremor
Time Frame: From intervention until 24-month after intervention

Proportion of participants who have relapse of tremor at any post-operative follow-up over 24 months in the Dopamine-responsive and Dopamine-resistant groups.

Main analysis will evaluate the time points of which relapse occur and differences between the groups Relapse is defined as a decline of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part III: Motor Examination Part III total tremor subscore, items 3.15-3.18 (0-40 points) to <50% improvement relative to the pre-surgical baseline

From intervention until 24-month after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Baseline until 24 months post-intervention

Incidence, type, and severity of treatment-related and non-treatment-related adverse events recorded during the procedure, at 24 hours, and at each follow-up visit.

Baseline neurological deficits are documented preoperatively and are not reclassified as adverse events unless worsened post-procedure.

Baseline until 24 months post-intervention
Change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) from baseline to 24 months.
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Change in Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) from baseline to 24 months.
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Troublesome Tremor Relapse (PGIC-Defined)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

Proportion of participants reporting their tremor as "much worse" or "very much worse" compared with the previous visit on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale (ranging from "very much better" to "very much worse").

Reflects clinically meaningful recurrence of tremor from the patient perspective.

Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Changes in Activity of daily living
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Comparison of changes in Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), Part II (Activities of Daily Living; range 0-52, lower scores indicate better functioning) from baseline through 24 month of follow-up between the two groups.
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Change in quality-of-life (QoL) scores from baseline to 24 months
Time Frame: Baseline until 24 month post-intervention
Change of QoL at 24 month compared to baseline. Comparison of differences between the two groups
Baseline until 24 month post-intervention
Change in cognitive performance (MoCA score) from baseline to follow-up
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Change in cognitive performance from baseline to 24 months measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; range 0-30, where higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning).
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association between baseline Raphe/Putamen specific binding ratio (SBR) and sustained tremor control at 24 months
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

Baseline raphe/putamen ratio will be derived from ¹⁸F-DOPA PET as an index of relative serotonergic-to-dopaminergic terminal integrity.

The association between baseline raphe/putamen ratio and sustained tremor control at 24 months will be analyzed.

Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
Association between baseline levodopa-test outcomes and sustained tremor control at 24 months
Time Frame: Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention
The association between baseline levodopa-test responsiveness and sustained tremor control at 24 months will be analyzed.
Pre-intervention baseline until 24 month after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tremor

Clinical Trials on MR-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy

Subscribe