- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07298018
A Pilot Study of RISE for Nurse Managers Retreat
February 17, 2026 updated by: AdventHealth
The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the RISE for Nurse Managers retreat and its impact on occupational and psychological well-being indicators
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The RISE program is an empirically supported wellbeing intervention for nurses and nurse leaders delivered over 8 or 9 weeks in 90-minute weekly sessions facilitated by a licensed mental health professional.
The program themes are Resilience, Insight, Self-Compassion, and Empowerment.
This study will be to examine the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the program in a retreat style format over 2.5 days.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
16
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Amanda T. Sawyer, PhD
- Phone Number: 407-200-2901
- Email: Amanda.Sawyer@AdventHealth.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amy West, RN
- Email: Amy.West@AdventHealth.com
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32804
- Recruiting
- AdventHealth
-
Contact:
- Amanda Sawyer, PhD
- Email: amanda.sawyer@adventhealth.com
-
Contact:
- Tere Richard, MHSA
- Email: tere.richard@adventhealth.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Amanda Sawyer, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- an employed AdventHealth Nurse Manager
- a "moderate" or "high" score in burnout equal to ≥17 in the Emotional Exhaustion Domain and/or ≥7 in the Depersonalization Domain on the MBI
Exclusion Criteria:
- a direct care RN, Nurse Director, Educator, and Executive
- a "low" score in burnout equal to <17 in the Emotional Exhaustion domain and/or <7 in the Depersonalization domain on the MBI
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Participant group
Intervention group will attend the RISE Retreat program, which is a 2.5-day retreat-style psychoeducational group program facilitated by licensed mental health professionals (LMHPs)
|
Psychoeducational group program designed to impact occupational and psychological indicators including resilience, insight, self-compassion, empowerment, burnout and secondary trauma
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
|
22-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 0=never, 1=a few times a year or less, 2=once a month or less, 3=a few times a month, 4=once a week, 5=a few times a week, 6=every day.
MBI includes 3 dimensions of Burnout: Emotional Exhaustion, Depersonalization, and Personal Accomplishment.
There are 9 items included in Emotional Exhaustion and scores can range from 0-54.
There are 5 items included in Depersonalization and scores can range from 0-30.
There are 8 items included in Personal Accomplishment and scores can range from 0-48.
Higher scores on Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization and lower scores on Personal Accomplishment are indicative of Burnout
|
Baseline, 1-month follow-up, 3-month follow-up, 6-month follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Employment Status
Time Frame: 12-month post-program
|
Human Resources Data
|
12-month post-program
|
|
Professional Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
30-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, 5=very often.
PROQOL includes 3 dimensions: Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress.
Each subscale includes 10 items and scores can range from 10-50.
For Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress, lower scores are better.
Sums of 10-22 = low level, 23-41 = average level, and 42-50=high level of Burnout and Secondary Traumatic Stress.
For Compassion Satisfaction, higher scores are better.
Sum of 10-22=low level, 23-41=average level, and 42-50=high level of Compassion Satisfaction.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
6-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 1=strongly agree, 2=disagree, 3=neutral, 4=agree, 5=strongly agree.
Sum of items can range from 6-30, which is then divided by 6 to get an average score.
Higher score is better, with 1-2.99 = low resilience, 3-4.3 = normal resilience, and 4.31-5.0
= high resilience.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Self-Reflection and Insight Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
20-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 1=strongly disagree, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6=strongly agree.
Six items are included in Self-Reflection and scores can range from 6-42, with higher scores indicating a greater self-reflection.
Six items are included in Insight, and scores can also range from 6-42 with higher scores indicating more Insight.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
12-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 1=almost never, 2, 3, 4, 5=almost always.
Scores are added and then averaged.
While the average score is to be used comparatively, score 1.0-2.49 is considered low, 2.5-3.5 is considered moderate, and 3.51-5.0 is considered high.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
General Self-Efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
10-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 1=not at all true, 2=barely true, 3=moderately true, 4=exactly true.
Item scores are added together and then averaged with higher scores indicating more self-efficacy.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
10-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=fairly often, 4=very often.
The total score ranges from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 2 item scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
2-item questionnaire with the following response categories: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day.
Total score range is 0 to 6 and a score of 3 or higher suggests possible anxiety.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Patient Health Questionnaire - 2 item
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
2-item scale with the following response categories: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day.
Total score range is from 0 to 6, and a score of 3 or more indicates possible depressed mood.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
21-item scale scored using six-point responses: zero ("I did not experience this change as a result of my crisis") to five ("I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis").
Total score range is 0 to 105, which higher scores indicating more post traumatic growth.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
|
Psychological Empowerment Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
12-item measure that assesses empowerment in the workplace using a 7-point Likert response scale.
Four aspects are measured: meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact.
Total score range from 12 to 84, with higher scores indicating greater psychological empowerment.
|
Baseline, 1- and 3-and 6-month follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amanda T. Sawyer, PhD, AdventHealth
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
- Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, Tooley E, Christopher P, Bernard J. The brief resilience scale: assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care. 2003 Nov;41(11):1284-92. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000093487.78664.3C.
- Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Monahan PO, Lowe B. Anxiety disorders in primary care: prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Mar 6;146(5):317-25. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004.
- Raes F, Pommier E, Neff KD, Van Gucht D. Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):250-5. doi: 10.1002/cpp.702. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
- Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996 Jul;9(3):455-71. doi: 10.1007/BF02103658.
- Spreitzer GM. Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal. 1995; 38(5):1442-1465.
- Bailey AK, Sawyer AT, Robinson PS. A Psychoeducational Group Intervention for Nurses: Rationale, Theoretical Framework, and Development. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2023 May-Jun;29(3):232-240. doi: 10.1177/10783903211001116. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
- Litz BT, Plouffe RA, Nazarov A, Murphy D, Phelps A, Coady A, Houle SA, Dell L, Frankfurt S, Zerach G, Levi-Belz Y; Moral Injury Outcome Scale Consortium. Defining and Assessing the Syndrome of Moral Injury: Initial Findings of the Moral Injury Outcome Scale Consortium. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 5;13:923928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.923928. eCollection 2022.
- Sawyer AT, Bailey AK, Green JF, Sun J, Robinson PS. Resilience, Insight, Self-Compassion, and Empowerment (RISE): A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychoeducational Group Program for Nurses. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. 2023 Jul-Aug;29(4):314-327. doi: 10.1177/10783903211033338. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
- Sawyer AT, Tao H, Bailey AK. The Impact of a Psychoeducational Group Program on the Mental Well-Being of Unit-Based Nurse Leaders: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;20(11):6035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116035.
- Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual, 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1996.
- Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user's portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, 35, 37.
- Stamm, B. H. (2010). Professional Quality of Life: Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Version 5 (ProQOL). http://www.proqol.org.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
February 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 16, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 16, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 11, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 19, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 17, 2026
Last Verified
November 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2365808
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Burnout
-
Shengjing HospitalActive, not recruitingCareer Burnout | Student BurnoutChina
-
Fundacion Arturo Lopez PerezNot yet recruitingBurnout Syndrome | Professional Burnout
-
Wroclaw University of Health and Sport SciencesUniversity of Silesia in Katowice; Jan Dlugosz University in CzestochowaCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruitingOccupational Burnout
-
Region SkaneLund University; Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research; County...CompletedProfessional BurnoutSweden
-
University of PadovaUniversity of ChileCompleted
-
Uppsala UniversityNot yet recruitingBurnout | Exhaustion Disorder | Clinical Burnout
-
Firstbeat Technologies OyTampere University; University of Jyvaskyla; Aisti Health OyActive, not recruitingOccupational Stress | Occupational BurnoutFinland
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompleted
Clinical Trials on Intervention Group
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Beijing HospitalThe First Hospital of Jilin University; Jilin University; Chinese Academy of...Not yet recruitingAsthma | Allergic Disease
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUnknown
-
University of LiegeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege; Bial Foundation; FNRS (Télévie); Fondation...Active, not recruitingPain | Cancer | Fatigue | Cognitive Impairment | Sleep Disturbance | Distress, EmotionalBelgium
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHeart Diseases | Cardiovascular Diseases
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Cancer Prevention Institute of CaliforniaCompletedHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedAnxiety | Self Esteem
-
TC Erciyes UniversityNot yet recruitingNeuropathic Pain | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.Salubris (Suzhou) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.RecruitingPostmenopausal Women With OsteoporosisChina
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipSwitzerland