Clinical Efficacy and Mechanism Exploration of MR-61 in Delaying the Progression of Myopia

December 20, 2025 updated by: Yifeng Yu, Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Clinical Efficacy and Mechanism Exploration of MR-61 in Delaying the Progression of Myopia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

To investigate whether probiotic MR-61 can assist in slowing down the progression rate of myopia (a prospective randomized controlled study).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To investigate whether probiotic MR-61 can assist in slowing down the progression rate of myopia (a prospective randomized controlled study).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

164

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jiangxi
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, China, 330008
        • Recruiting
        • Yifeng Yu
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Myopia is defined as spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ -0.5D.
  2. Aged between 3 and 18 years, with no restriction on gender.
  3. Cylinder power ≤ 1.50D; anisometropia of SE between both eyes ≤ 1.50D.
  4. The subject has sufficient compliance with the study follow-up; the subject or their guardian has the intention to receive treatment and has signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of other concomitant ocular diseases;
  2. Abnormal findings on clinical slit-lamp examination;
  3. Existence of amblyopia, manifest strabismus, esotropia, or other congenital ocular diseases;
  4. Individuals with abnormal intraocular pressure or abnormal axial length of the eye;
  5. Either or both parents having a spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ -6.00D;
  6. Other conditions inconsistent with this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Probiotic group
Oral administration of the investigational probiotic powder MR-61. The primary component is Bifidobacterium. Dosage: one sachet, 2-3 times daily, for 3 months.
Oral administration of the investigational probiotic powder MR-61. The primary component is Bifidobacterium. Dosage: one sachet, 2-3 times daily, for 3 months.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Oral administration of a matched placebo powder. Dosage: one sachet, 2-3 times daily, for 3 months.
Oral administration of a matched placebo powder. Dosage: one sachet, 2-3 times daily, for 3 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Spherical Equivalent Refraction
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The change in spherical equivalent refraction (SER) from baseline to each follow-up visit, measured in diopters (D). SER is calculated as the spherical power plus half of the cylindrical power. A negative change indicates an increase in myopia.
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Axial Length
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The growth value of ocular axial length, measured in millimeters (mm).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Corneal Curvature
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The change in corneal curvature (keratometry), measured in diopters (D).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Binocular Anisometropia
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The difference in spherical equivalent refraction between the two eyes, measured in diopters (D).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Anterior Chamber Depth
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The change in depth of the anterior chamber of the eye, measured in millimeters (mm).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Lens Thickness
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The change in thickness of the crystalline lens, measured in millimeters (mm).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Vitreous Cavity Depth
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The change in depth of the vitreous cavity, measured in millimeters (mm)
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Far Phoria Degree
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The degree of heterophoria for distance vision, measured in prism diopters (PD).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in Near Phoria Degree
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
The degree of heterophoria for near vision, measured in prism diopters (PD).
Measured at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Score on the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Visual quality and vision-related quality of life is assessed using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 (NEI VFQ-25). The overall composite score ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score represents better visual function and quality of life.
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Cognitive function is assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a widely used screening test for cognitive impairment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with a score of 26 or higher considered normal. As probiotic supplementation may influence cognitive function, this will be considered in the interpretation of results.
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Score on the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Gastrointestinal symptoms are assessed using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), a validated questionnaire covering reflux, abdominal pain, indigestion, diarrhea, and constipation. Each symptom is rated on a scale from 0 (no discomfort) to 6 (very severe discomfort). A higher total or subscale score indicates more severe gastrointestinal symptoms (worse outcome). As probiotic supplementation may influence gastrointestinal function, this will be considered in the interpretation of results.
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Score on the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Participant adaptation and overall quality of life are assessed using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), a validated generic quality of life instrument. It covers physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment domains. The total score is transformed to range from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better quality of life and better adaptation. As probiotic supplementation may influence overall well-being, this will be considered in the interpretation of results.
Assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 19, and 25 months post-intervention.
Change in gut microbiota composition and diversity assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing
Time Frame: Fecal samples collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 25 months post-intervention for sequencing analysis.
Fecal samples collected before and after intervention are analyzed using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Key metrics include changes in alpha diversity indices (e.g., Shannon Index, observed species), beta diversity (e.g., weighted/unweighted UniFrac distance), and relative abundance of specific bacterial taxa (e.g., phylum Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio, genus Bifidobacterium).
Fecal samples collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 25 months post-intervention for sequencing analysis.
Change in concentrations of fecal and serum metabolites
Time Frame: Fecal and blood serum samples collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 25 months post-intervention for metabolite analysis.
Targeted metabolomic analysis is performed on fecal and blood serum samples. Concentrations of specific metabolites (e.g., short-chain fatty acids, bile acids, or inflammatory cytokines) are measured and reported in nanomolar (nM) or picograms per milliliter (pg/mL) concentrations, as applicable.
Fecal and blood serum samples collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 25 months post-intervention for metabolite analysis.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIT-I-2025-082

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia Progressing

Clinical Trials on Investigational Bifidobacterium Preparation MR-61

Subscribe