- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07300878
Effect of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Conventional Laryngoscopy Upon Hemodynamics
May 27, 2026 updated by: Muhammad Haroon Anwar, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences
Comparison Of Hemodynamic Stress Response To Laryngoscopy With Video Laryngoscopy Versus Macintosh Laryngoscopy In Patients Undergoing Elective Surgeries Under General Anesthesia
In general anestheisa airway is secured by passing a tube down the widpipe.
This helps the patient to breath via ventilator during anesthesia.
For placing this tube laryngoscopy is done which results in increase in blood pressure and heart rate.
This study will compare the rise in blood pressure and heart rate among when using video laryngoscope with conventional laryngoscope.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In this study Patients will be randomly divided into two groups with group V patients being intubated using Videolaryngoscope while group M patients will be intubated using Macintosh laryngoscope.
The amount of rise in blood pressure and heart rate as a result of laryngoscopy will be noted.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
208
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Islamabad, Pakistan, 44000
- Deparment of Anesthesia PIMS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Elective surgeries under General Endotracheal Anesthesia. ASA class I and II.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnancy
- Body mass index >35 kg/m2
- No teeth
- Maxillofacial trauma
- Limited Cervical spine movement
- Upper Airway Tumors
- Preoperative assessment indicating difficult airway requiring use of video laryngoscope or fiberoptic intubation.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Video laryngoscopy
Patient in this group will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope
|
Patient will be intubated using hyperangulated C MAC video laryngoscope
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Laryngoscopy
Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopic blade
|
Patient in this group will be intubated using conventional macintosh laryngoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Upon arrival in OR (baseline) then immediately following intubation (T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
Upon arrival in OR (baseline) then immediately following intubation (T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Mean Blood Pressure
Time Frame: This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
|
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
|
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
This will be measured upon arrival in OR (baseline) immediately following intubation(T1) and then at 3,5,10 minutes following intubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
December 22, 2025
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 15, 2026
Study Completion (Actual)
May 15, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 21, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 21, 2025
First Posted (Actual)
December 24, 2025
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 29, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 27, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- F.5.2/2024(ERRC)/PIMS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
This is due to hospital and ethical committee policies
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Video Laryngoscopy
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalRecruitingRemifentanil | Tracheal Intubation | Rocuronium | Video LaryngoscopyDenmark
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteNot yet recruitingAirway Management | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Video Laryngoscopy
-
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityEnrolling by invitationThe Effects of Video Game Playing Habits and Some Sports Activities on Intubation Performance With Video LaryngoscopyTurkey
-
Patan Academy of Health SciencesNot yet recruitingTo Compare Success Rate of Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompleted
-
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'OrléansCompleted
-
St. Andrew's General Hospital, Patras, GreeceCompleted
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...Completed
-
University of NebraskaThe Association for Medical UltrasoundCompleted
Clinical Trials on C MAC hyperangulated video laryngoscopy
-
Trakya UniversityNot yet recruitingThoracic Surgery | Endobronchial Intubation | One Lung Ventillation (OLV) | Double Lumen Tube Intubation
-
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical CentreCompleted
-
Indiana UniversityTerminatedPyloric Stenosis | Intubation, PediatricUnited States
-
Nicklaus Children's Hospital f/k/a Miami Children...Florida International UniversityCompletedIntubation; Difficult | Cervical Spine InjuryUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedIntubation; DifficultUnited States
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfCompletedGeneral Anesthesia | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | VideolaryngoscopyGermany
-
Inonu UniversityCompleted
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptCompleted
-
Aydin Adnan Menderes UniversityCompletedHypertension | Intubation | AnesthesiaTurkey
-
Hospital Clinico Universitario de SantiagoRecruitingIntubated Patients | Percutaneous TracheostomySpain