Central Sensitization Syndromes and Post-Traumatic Stress in Women: Psychological Profile and Intervention (SINSENTRA)

December 16, 2025 updated by: Elena R. Serrano-Ibáñez, University of Malaga

Psychological Profile Associated With the Complexity of Central Sensitization Syndromes, Comorbid With Trauma and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Women: Testing the Effectiveness of a Person-Centered Psychological Intervention

Central Sensitivity Syndromes (CSSs) are a group of conditions that are highly prevalent, particularly among women, and often occur alongside post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

This research project has two aims: Study 1) to investigate the psychological profiles of women with CSS-PTSD comorbidity; and Study 2) to design and evaluate the effectiveness of distinct interventions for each profile identified in Study 1.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Central Sensitivity Syndromes (CSSs) are a group of conditions, including fibromyalgia and chronic pelvic pain, associated with symptoms such as perceived pain intensity, depression, anxiety, stress, sleep disturbances, and disability. These syndromes are highly prevalent, particularly among women, and often occur alongside post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This condition stems from a variety of traumatic experiences and manifests as a range of symptoms in individuals with different psychological profiles. However, not all individuals who experience trauma develop PTSD or CSSs, nor do all individuals with CSSs have PTSD or exhibit the same symptom patterns. Transdiagnostic psychological variables may contribute to the development and maintenance of both conditions. Commonly observed factors in both CSSs and PTSD include emotional dysregulation, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, distress intolerance, and dissociation. These transdiagnostic vulnerability variables could be associated with each profile. Identifying these profiles may enable targeted interventions that address the underlying vulnerabilities driving CSS-PTSD comorbidity. By aligning treatment to individual vulnerability patterns, this approach aims to improve outcomes for women affected by CSS-PTSD.

Four PTSD profiles will be identified:

  • Reactive (with prominent intrusions, avoidance, and hyperarousal).
  • Dysphoric (with anhedonia and negative affect).
  • Dissociative (with high negative and positive dissociative symptoms).
  • Mixed (with high levels of all PTSD symptoms). However, no studies have analysed how these transdiagnostic vulnerability variables (emotion dysregulation, anxiety sensitivity, experiential avoidance, distress intolerance, and dissociation) are grouped and shape the different PTSD symptom profiles in populations with either PTSD or comorbid CSS. Therefore, the analysis of the association between PTSD profiles and transdiagnostic variables is exploratory.

The treatments will be developed based on the variables associated with each profile identified in Study 1.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Málaga
      • Málaga, Málaga, Spain, 29010
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
      • Málaga, Málaga, Spain, 29009
        • Hospital Universitario Regional de Málaga_Hospital Civil
    • Torre Del Mar
      • Málaga, Torre Del Mar, Spain, 29740
        • Área de Gestión Sanitaria Este de Málaga-Axarquía

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. being a biological woman.
  2. having a medical diagnosis of CSS.
  3. scoring >36 on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5, which indicates PTSD in people with chronic pain.
  4. having the ability to understand and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. having a diagnosis of serious mental illness or neurodegenerative disease.
  2. not being fluent in spoken and written Spanish.
  3. undergoing treatment for an oncological, degenerative, or terminal disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Profile 1_Reactive
The arms will be developed based on the psychological profile identified in Study 1, given that a better understanding of CSS-PTSD comorbidity is necessary to design an effective intervention targeting the specific variables maintaining this condition.
The interventions will be developed based on the techniques previously developed within cognitive behavioural approaches, which have demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions.
Experimental: Profile 2_Dysphoric
The arms will be developed based on the psychological profile identified in Study 1, as a better understanding of CSS-PTSD comorbidity is necessary to design an effective intervention targeting the specific variables that maintain this condition.
The interventions will be developed based on the techniques previously developed within cognitive behavioural approaches, which have demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions.
Experimental: Profile 3_Dissociative
The arms will be developed based on the psychological profile identified in Study 1, given that a better understanding of CSS-PTSD comorbidity is necessary to design an effective intervention targeting the specific variables maintaining this condition.
The interventions will be developed based on the techniques previously developed within cognitive behavioural approaches, which have demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions.
Experimental: Profile 4_Mixed
The arms will be developed based on the psychological profile identified in Study 1, as a better understanding of CSS-PTSD comorbidity is necessary to design an effective intervention targeting the specific variables that maintain this condition.
The interventions will be developed based on the techniques previously developed within cognitive behavioural approaches, which have demonstrated efficacy in treating both conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in anxiety sensitivity
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI-3). It is a 16-item questionnaire; items are rated from 0 ("Not at all or almost nothing) to 4 ("Very much"), with higher total scores indicating greater anxiety sensitivity.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in emotion dysregulation
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-S SF). It comprises 18 items with a 5-point Likert scale, from 1("Almost never) to 5 "Almost always") divide into 5 subscales: nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulty engaging in goal-directed behaviour, impulse control difficulties, limited access to emotion regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity. Higher total scores indicate greater difficulties in emotion regulation.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in experiential avoidance
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ II). It is a brief 7-item instrument; items are a 7-point Likert-type scale, ranging from 1 ("Never") to 7 ("Always"). Higher total scores indicate greater experiential avoidance.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in distress intolerance
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of the Distress Tolerance Scale (DTS). It is a 15-item questionnaire; items are rated from 1 ("Strongly agree") to 5 ("Strongly disagree"), with higher total scores indicating greater distress tolerance.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in dissociative symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of the abbreviated scale of the Dissociative Experiences Scale-Modified (DES-M). It consists of 18 questions, rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 1 = "Never" to 5 = "Always"), with higher total scores indicating greater dissociative symptoms.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in daily symptom monitoring
Time Frame: Treatment (periprocedural), 1-months follow-up.

Participants will complete an electronic diary from the time of the initial assessment until 30 days post-intervention.

Electronic diary developed and validated by Åkerblom et al., 2022.

Treatment (periprocedural), 1-months follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Central Sensitization Indexes
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
  1. Spanish Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). It is a 25-item questionnaire that comprises a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ('Never') to 4 ('Always'). Higher total scores indicate greater central sensitization symptoms.
  2. Quantitative sensory testing (QST). Tests that allow the nociceptive system to be comprehensively evaluated and obtain objective information on how pain is perceived.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in posttraumatic stress symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-5 (PCLC-5). A 20-item self-report, with a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much"). Higher total scores indicate greater posttraumatic stress symptoms.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in stress symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Stress subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). It is a 7-item subscale; items are rated from 0 ("Never") to 3 ("Almost always"), with higher total scores indicating greater stress symptoms.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in anxiety and depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). It has two subscales (Anxiety and Depression) with 7 questions each, scored 0-3, totaling 0-21 per subscale, where higher scores indicate greater severity
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in sleep disturbance
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Spanish version of PROMIS 8b-item Sleep Disturbance Scale. It uses 8 questions to assess difficulty falling/staying asleep, restlessness, and satisfaction, scored on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = "Never" to 5 = "Always"), with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Change in pain interference
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
The Short Form of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF). A 9-item self-report questionnaire assessing pain severity (worst, least, average, current) and its interference with daily life (activity, mood, sleep, work, etc.); items are rated from 0 ("no pain"/"not interferes") to 4 ("worst pain imaginable" /"completely interferes"), with higher total scores indicating greater pain interference.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events (side effects)
Time Frame: Treatment (periprocedural) and 3-months follow-up, 6-months follow-up.
Adverse Events are not expected given the content of the treatment and its non-invasive nature, however, they will be assessed, recorded and controlled for in the analyses.
Treatment (periprocedural) and 3-months follow-up, 6-months follow-up.
Change in medical data
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).
Medication intake (analgesics and psychotropic drugs), dose, and healthcare utilization.
Pre-treatment (T1), Post-treatment (T2; 24 weeks after T1), 3-months follow-up (T3), 6-months follow-up (T4).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 2, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Sensitization

Clinical Trials on CSS-PTSD psychological interventions

Subscribe