The Efficacy of a Technology-Assisted Block Training Program on Cognitive Function, Hand Dexterity, and Grip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Mixed-Methods Research

December 23, 2025 updated by: Chia Jung Hsieh, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
Block-building activities represent a promising tool for enhancing cognitive and hand function in older adults. When integrated with technological support, they offer personalized training advantages; however, their comprehensive effectiveness requires empirical validation. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a "Technology-Assisted Block Training Program" to explore its effects on cognitive function, hand grip strength, dexterity, and quality of life among community-dwelling older adults, while examining participants' subjective experiences.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In response to the aging population trend, developing evidence-based care programs for older adults has become increasingly necessary. To delay functional decline in individuals, intervention programs that combine cognitive and motor training are gaining greater attention. Manual activities such as block-building can effectively improve working memory and processing abilities. However, traditional block training and cognitive training often struggle to maintain participants' motivation and sustained engagement due to monotonous content. Therefore, technology-assisted block training has emerged as a solution, providing real-time feedback, personalized difficulty adjustment, and multi-sensory stimulation to effectively overcome the limitations of traditional training approaches and enhance participant motivation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Yu-Ling Chen NP, PHD student
  • Phone Number: Ext. 3135 886(2)2822-7101
  • Email: vicky531366@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Taiwan
      • Yilan, Taiwan, Taiwan, 260
        • Recruiting
        • Xindong Community Activity Center, Yilan City

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults aged 65 and older
  2. Mentally alert and able to communicate
  3. Willing to participate in this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with dementia by a physician
  2. Severe sensory or communication impairment
  3. Hand function impairment that prevents manipulation of building blocks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: single group
This intervention arm involves a weekly 2-hour building block course that incorporates mental rotation training components. Participants will engage in structured building block activities designed to enhance spatial reasoning abilities, with specific lesson plans focused on developing mental rotation skills through hands-on construction and manipulation of three-dimensional objects.
This study, drawing on the theories proposed by Aguilar Ramirez et al. (2022) and Shepard and Metzler (1971), developed a mental rotation application and a corresponding block-building lesson plan. Participants then engaged in individual block-building activities, guided by the lesson plan, to train their spatial reasoning skills. Finally, the developed APP was used for mental rotation training, and its suitability and feasibility were rigorously validated through expert review and a pilot study. a. Mental Rotation Virtual Reality APP: The APP's content was validated by interdisciplinary experts (including gerontology, activity planning, cognitive training, and information technology) to ensure its appropriateness and feasibility. The APP incorporates technology-assisted elements, such as real-time feedback and personalized difficulty adjustment for the mental rotation exercises, to enhance training effectiveness and participant motivation. Furthermore, the built-in "Creative Showcase"

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Function - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention

Description:

The MoCA is a 30-point cognitive screening tool with established reliability in older adults. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

Unit of Measure:

Points on a 30-point scale

Time Frame: Baseline, pre-intervention
Spatial Cognition - Mental Rotation Test
Time Frame: Baseline , pre-intervention

Description:

The Mental Rotation Test assesses spatial cognition. Higher numbers of correct responses indicate better mental rotation ability.

Unit of Measure:

Number of correct responses

Baseline , pre-intervention
Hand Grip Strength - Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Time Frame: Baseline ,pre-intervention

Description:

Grip strength of each hand is measured using the Jamar dynamometer. Three trials per hand will be averaged. Higher values indicate greater grip strength.

Unit of Measure:

Kilograms (kg)

Baseline ,pre-intervention
Hand Dexterity - Purdue Pegboard Test
Time Frame: Baseline ,pre-intervention

Description:

The Purdue Pegboard Test assesses fine motor skills and dexterity of the hands and fingers. The score reflects the number of pegs correctly placed in the allotted time.

Unit of Measure:

Number of pegs placed

Baseline ,pre-intervention
Well-Being - WHO-5 Well-Being Index
Time Frame: Baseline , pre-intervention

Description:

The WHO-5 consists of five items rated on a 25-point scale. Higher scores indicate better well-being and quality of life.

Unit of Measure:

Points on a 25-point scale

Baseline , pre-intervention
System Usability - System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: Baseline , pre-intervention

Description:

The SUS assesses usability, learnability, and satisfaction with technology-based systems. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better usability.

Unit of Measure:

Score on a 0-100 scale

Baseline , pre-intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive Function - Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Description:

The MoCA is a 30-point cognitive screening tool with established reliability in older adults. Higher scores indicate better cognitive function.

Unit of Measure:

Points on a 30-point scale

Immediately After the 4-week Intervention
Spatial Cognition - Mental Rotation Test
Time Frame: Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Description:

The Mental Rotation Test assesses spatial cognition. Higher numbers of correct responses indicate better mental rotation ability.

Unit of Measure:

Number of correct responses

Immediately After the 4-week Intervention
Hand Grip Strength - Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Time Frame: Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Description:

Grip strength of each hand is measured using the Jamar dynamometer. Three trials per hand will be averaged. Higher values indicate greater grip strength.

Unit of Measure:

Kilograms (kg)

Immediately After the 4-week Intervention
Hand Dexterity - Purdue Pegboard Test
Time Frame: Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Description:

The Purdue Pegboard Test assesses fine motor skills and dexterity of the hands and fingers. The score reflects the number of pegs correctly placed in the allotted time.

Unit of Measure:

Number of pegs placed

Immediately After the 4-week Intervention
Well-Being - WHO-5 Well-Being Index
Time Frame: Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Description:

The WHO-5 consists of five items rated on a 25-point scale. Higher scores indicate better well-being and quality of life.

Unit of Measure:

Points on a 25-point scale

Immediately After the 4-week Intervention
System Usability - System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Description:

The SUS assesses usability, learnability, and satisfaction with technology-based systems. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better usability.

Unit of Measure:

Score on a 0-100 scale

Immediately After the 4-week Intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 27, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 27, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Technology-Assisted Block Training Program

Subscribe