Effect of E-learning Training on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Assessment

January 5, 2026 updated by: Stuby Loric

Effect of E-learning Training on National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Assessment Performance: a Web-based Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this web-based randomized clinical trial is to evaluate whether an e-learning training program improves the accuracy of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) assessments among practicing paramedics in French-speaking Switzerland who have not previously received formal training in these scales.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does e-learning training improve performance on a standardized NIHSS assessment quiz compared with no prior training?
  • Does e-learning training improve the accuracy of mRS assessment using case-based clinical vignettes compared with no prior training?

Researchers will compare paramedics who complete the NIHSS and mRS e-learning modules before assessment (intervention group) with paramedics who complete the assessments without prior training (control group) to determine whether e-learning training leads to higher assessment performance scores.

Participants will:

  • Provide electronic informed consent via a secure web-based platform
  • Be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group
  • Complete either the e-learning modules before assessment or the assessments before training, depending on group allocation
  • Complete an online NIHSS quiz and mRS case-based vignettes
  • Receive access to the NIHSS and mRS e-learning modules by the end of the study

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Canton of Geneva
      • Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 1201

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Holding a paramedic title (recognized in Switzerland)
  • Currently actively practicing in Switzerland
  • Fluent in French (all study material will be provided in French)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously completed formal training on either the NIHSS or the mRS.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group
Control group: Participants will first complete the NIHSS quiz and mRS case vignettes without prior training.
Experimental: Intervention group
Participants will follow the e-learning modules (NIHSS and mRS).
Educational intervention by the mean of an e-learning modules (NIHSS and mRS).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance on a NIHSS 50-item quiz
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study path in a timeframe of maximum 4 weeks.
The primary outcome will be the performance on a NIHSS 50-item quiz consisting in 3 full assessments of a patient (3x15 items) plus 5 general questions (each question scores 1 point if correct, maximum total of 50 points).
From enrollment to the end of the study path in a timeframe of maximum 4 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance of mRS assessment
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the study path in a timeframe of maximum 4 weeks.
The secondary outcome will be the performance of mRS assessment of about 10 newly developed case-based vignettes (each question scores 1 point if correct, maximum total of 10 points).
From enrollment to the end of the study path in a timeframe of maximum 4 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Loric Stuby, Genève TEAM Ambulances

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

January 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study data will be made available by deposition in a public repository (Yareta.org).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Education

Clinical Trials on Educational intervention

Subscribe