Neural Changes After Speech Therapy in Patients With Cleft Palate: A Brain Imaging Study (fMRI-Speech-CP)

January 30, 2026 updated by: Shufan Zhao

A Brain Imaging Study of Abnormal Neural Network Reorganization Following Speech Training in Patients With Compensatory Articulation Secondary to Cleft Palate

Cleft palate is one of the most common maxillofacial congenital malformations, which results in severe speech disorders. Compensatory articulation disorder, also known as non-oral articulation disorder (NOA), is considered as the major pathological change among these patients. However, the outcome of speech therapy, an important treatment method, for NOA is often unsatisfactory. This is attributed to the erroneous articulation patterns and entrenched habits in patients with NOA, which require considerable training intensity and time. According to preliminary results from the investigators' own study, as well as studies by others, structural and functional changes have been clearly identified in some brain regions of patients with NOA, suggesting that abnormal neural networks are involved in the progression of NOA. Thus, the investigators proposed the hypothesis that speech therapy effectively corrects articulation disorders through reconfiguration of pathological neural function and reorganization of the abnormal neural network involved in NOA. In this study, multimodal brain imaging techniques will be applied to investigate differences in brain functional connectivity and structural connectivity networks among groups with oral articulation (OA), varying degrees of NOA in postoperative cleft palate patients, and healthy controls. The relationship between improvement in speech intelligibility and alterations in brain networks before and after intervention will be compared. This study aims to reveal the neural network substrates associated with NOA and speech therapy. Overall, through this comprehensive study, the investigators aim not only to provide new insight into the underlying neural mechanism of NOA but also to accumulate evidence for improving the efficacy of speech therapy and discovering new therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cleft palate often leads to compensatory articulation disorder (Non-oral Articulation, NOA), which is resistant to conventional speech therapy. This study is grounded in the hypothesis that the efficacy of speech training is mediated by the reorganization of pathological neural networks and structures associated with NOA.

This non-randomized, longitudinal study employs a parallel-group design involving three cohorts: patients with NOA receiving speech training, postoperative cleft palate patients with normal oral articulation (OA) as a clinical control, and healthy controls. The primary objective is to identify the distinctive neural signatures (in both functional connectivity and brain structure) linked to NOA and its remediation through training.

All participants undergo multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (including high-resolution T1-weighted and resting-state functional scans) and standardized speech assessments at baseline. Only the NOA group then receives a structured speech training intervention, followed by post-intervention reevaluation. By comparing changes within and between groups, this study aims to disentangle neural alterations specific to NOA from those related to cleft palate in general.

The integrative analysis of brain-wide changes with a focus on speech-related regions is expected to provide a systems-level understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying NOA and treatment-induced recovery. The findings may contribute to the development of more effective, neuroscience-informed therapeutic strategies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

164

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China, 325000
        • School & Hospital of Stomatology Wenzhou Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged between 4 and 16 years.
  • For patient groups: Diagnosed with non-syndromic cleft palate and having undergone cleft palate repair surgery at least 1 year prior.
  • For the NOA group: Diagnosed with compensatory articulation disorder (Non-oral Articulation, NOA) through standardized speech assessment.
  • For the OA group: Confirmed to have no compensatory articulation disorder (Oral Articulation, OA) through standardized speech assessment.
  • For the healthy control group: No history of any craniofacial malformations, speech disorders, or neurological diseases.
  • Participants and their legal guardians are able to understand and willing to provide written informed consent.
  • Able to cooperate with and complete magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations (e.g., no claustrophobia, no contraindicated metal implants).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other known syndromes or cognitive impairments (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability).
  • History of other neurological diseases that may affect speech function (e.g., cerebral palsy, hearing loss).
  • Presence of severe other orofacial anomalies, or an unrepaired palatal fistula.
  • Contraindications for MRI examination (e.g., non-removable metal implants, severe claustrophobia).
  • Having received systematic speech therapy within the past 6 months.
  • Any other condition deemed by the investigator to be unsuitable for participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Non-Oral Articulation(NOA) group
Participants receive the investigational behavioral intervention: Structured Speech Decompensation Therapy. This one-on-one therapy uses the glottal stop /kʔ/ as a key sound to guide correct articulation placement and correct compensatory habits, integrating multisensory cues. The intervention is administered by a certified speech therapist at a dosage of 1-hour sessions, with a frequency of 3 sessions per week, for a duration of 5 to 12 weeks. Parent participation in sessions and daily prescribed home practice are required components.
This structured, one-on-one speech decompensation therapy targets Non-oral Articulation Disorder (NOA) in postoperative cleft palate patients, using the glottal stop /kʔ/ as a key sound to guide correct articulation placement and correct compensatory habits. It follows a structured paradigm from error recognition to generalization, integrating multisensory cues. Delivered by a therapist 3 times/week for 1 hour over 5-12 weeks with parent participation, it includes daily home practice. Completion requires accurate sound production, with daily parent-supervised maintenance practice for one year thereafter.
No Intervention: Oral Articulation (OA) Group
Participants do not receive the investigational speech training intervention. This arm serves as the clinical control group.
No Intervention: healthy control(HC)
Participants do not receive any study-related intervention. This arm serves as the healthy normative control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Connectivity of the Speech Related Network
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to post-training assessment (approximately at Week 12)
Change in resting-state functional connectivity, focusing on connections between pre-defined speech-related regions (Broca's and Wernicke's areas) and additionally assessed through whole-brain network analysis, using resting-state fMRI data.
From baseline assessment to post-training assessment (approximately at Week 12)
Change in Percent Correct Consonants (PCC)
Time Frame: From baseline assessment to post-training assessment (approximately at Week 12)
Change in the percentage of consonants produced correctly, assessed within both single-word and conversational speech contexts. The measure is derived from standardized speech samples, which are evaluated by blinded, certified speech-language pathologists.
From baseline assessment to post-training assessment (approximately at Week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Grey Matter Volume (GMV) of Articulation-Related Regions
Time Frame: From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Alterations in grey matter volume across the whole brain, with a focus on regions implicated in articulation. Measured by voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis of high-resolution T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans.
From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Change in Regional Homogeneity (ReHo) in Speech-Related Cortex
Time Frame: From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Changes in local brain activity synchronization across the whole brain, with particular emphasis on the speech-related cortex.
From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Change in Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations (fALFF)
Time Frame: From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Changes in the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal across the whole brain, assessed within regions of the speech and auditory processing networks. Derived from resting-state fMRI data.
From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Change in Proportion of Compensatory Articulation Errors
Time Frame: From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Change in the proportion of compensatory (non-oral) articulation errors relative to the total number of consonants attempted, analyzed within both single-word and conversational speech samples. This metric is calculated through phonetic transcription of the speech samples to quantify the frequency of error patterns characteristic of non-oral articulation.
From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Change in White Matter Volume (WMV) of Articulation-Related Regions
Time Frame: From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)
Alterations in white matter volume across the whole brain, particularly within tracts associated with speech motor pathways. Analyzed using voxel-based analysis of T1-weighted MRI to quantify white matter volume changes.
From baseline to post-training assessment (at Week 12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

A final decision regarding the sharing of individual participant data (IPD) has not been made at the time of this registration. This study involves sensitive neuroimaging and speech data. Data sharing considerations, including the feasibility of complete de-identification, compliance with local regulations and ethical approvals, and the establishment of appropriate data access protocols, require further review by the study investigators and sponsoring institution. A formal data sharing plan may be developed in the future and will be made available upon reasonable request or via a controlled-access repository if deemed feasible and appropriate.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Clinical Trials on Structured Speech Training for Decompensation

Subscribe