Exploring the Clinical Value of an AI-Assisted Patient Self-Assessment App for Bowel Preparation: A Multicenter Study

The quality of bowel preparation hinges on how well patients follow the prep-drug regimen, so intensive education is essential. Phone calls, texts, short videos, and mini-programs have all been shown to boost compliance and improve prep quality. Still, we also need a way to spot-early-those patients who are likely to prep poorly so we can step in with a rescue plan.

In our pilot work the investigators built an AI-assisted mini-program that lets patients photograph their effluent and get an instant quality read-out. The single-center RCT showed excellent performance. Because these findings came from one center, the investigators are now launching a multicenter study to test the tool more broadly. Patients will use the AI mini-program at home; if the algorithm predicts inadequate prep it will prompt them to come in early or alert staff so the investigators can initiate a rescue protocol and, ultimately, improve bowel-cleansing quality.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

524

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Undergoing colonoscopy at a participating site
  3. Able to defecate in a toilet (or in a setting where stool characteristics can be observed) after taking the bowel-prep solution
  4. Proficient in using a smartphone
  5. Willing to participate voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class III or IV;

    • Gastric-outlet or intestinal obstruction; ③ Active gastrointestinal bleeding; ④ Enterostomy (colostomy/ileostomy); ⑤ Status post total colectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The App group
After taking the bowel-prep solution, patients in the app group are instructed to photograph their final stool in the toilet and upload the image through our smartphone app. The AI algorithm immediately scores the prep quality. If the image is rated "poor" or "inadequate," the app displays an alert advising the patient to come to the hospital early or contact clinical staff; clinical staffs then review the photo and decide whether a rescue preparation is needed. The standard rescue was an additional packet of polyethylene glycol. If the image is rated "adequate," the patient is told the prep is acceptable and should proceed to the appointment, where clinical staffs will use the uploaded photo to confirm eligibility for colonoscopy.
After taking the bowel-prep solution, patients in the app group are instructed to photograph their final stool in the toilet and upload the image through our smartphone app. The AI algorithm immediately scores the prep quality. If the image is rated "poor" or "inadequate," the app displays an alert advising the patient to come to the hospital early or contact clinical staff; clinical staffs then review the photo and decide whether a rescue preparation is needed. The standard rescue was an additional packet of polyethylene glycol. If the image is rated "adequate," the patient is told the prep is acceptable and should proceed to the appointment, where clinical staffs will use the uploaded photo to confirm eligibility for colonoscopy.
No Intervention: The control group
The control group followed the conventional procedure: before the examination, clinical staffs asked questions and relied on the patient's verbal description of their stool to judge the adequacy of bowel preparation. If the prep was deemed inadequate, the standard rescue was an additional packet of polyethylene glycol.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the bowel preparation quality between the app group and the control group.
Time Frame: Periprocedural
The rate of adequate and excellent bowel preparation.
Periprocedural

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post-procedural adverse events
Time Frame: From enrollment to 30 days after the procedure.
From enrollment to 30 days after the procedure.
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of the app-based assessment.
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value
Periprocedural
cecal intubation rate
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
cecal intubation time
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
withdrawal time (excluding polypectomy and biopsy)
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
polyp-detection rate (PDR), adenoma-detection rate (ADR), advanced-adenoma-detection rate (aADR)
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
rate of rescue preparation due to inadequate preparation
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
clinical staffs' assessment time
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural
User satisfaction score
Time Frame: Periprocedural
From 0 to 10, 0 stands for the least satisfaction, and 10 stands for the most satisfaction.
Periprocedural
rate of rescheduled examinations due to inadequate preparation
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Periprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025ZSLYEC-747

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

Clinical Trials on The app group

Subscribe