- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07348835
Using a Smart Implantable Device to Compare Early Recovery in Two Different Knee Arthroplasty Approaches
January 9, 2026 updated by: Total Joint Specialists
Continuous Monitoring Using a Smart Implantable Device (Persona IQ®) to Compare Medial Parapatellar vs. Subvastus Approaches in Early Post-Operative Total Knee Arthroplasty Recovery
This is a single-institution, prospective, randomized study comparing the medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in primary total knee arthroplasty using continuous, implant-based gait monitoring.
Patients receiving a Zimmer Persona IQ smart implant will be followed preoperatively and through the first 30 days post-operatively, with extended follow-up to 6 months.
Preoperative activity is captured using iPhone Health step-count data, while post-operative recovery is assessed using continuous tibial implant data, including step count, range of motion, cadence, walking speed, stride length, and distance.
These objective metrics are correlated with PROMs.
The primary outcome is daily step count.
Secondary outcomes include early functional milestones, pain, and patient-reported functional scores.
This study is designed to characterize early recovery trajectories and determine whether meaningful differences exist between surgical approaches.
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
110
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Thomas L Bradbury, M.D.
- Phone Number: (404)-759-3912
- Email: tombradburymd@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Sandy Springs, Georgia, United States, 30328
- Total Joint Surgery Center Atlanta
-
Contact:
- Zachary M Ricciardelli, B.S.
- Phone Number: (615)-957-0334
- Email: zach.ricciardelli@gmail.com
-
Contact:
- Email: zach.ricciardelli@gmail.com
-
Principal Investigator:
- Thomas L Bradbury, M.D.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Zachary M Ricciardelli, B.S.
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Charlotte C Baker, B.S.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients older than 18 years of age who plan to undergo medial congruent polyethylene bearing primary TKA with a PIQ
- Eligible for both approaches
- Have an iPhone and willing to "wear" it for two weeks preoperatively to get an estimated average stepcount
- Provide informed consent
- Willing to complete follow ups
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with TKA revisions
- Patients with insufficient pre-operative range of motion in the operative knee (flexion contracture of > 20 degrees or < 90° of knee flexion)
- Patients with Contralateral TKA within study time frame
- Patients with TKA other than medial congruent polyethylene bearing
- Patients with bilateral surgery
- Patients without a valid and active email address
- Patients not willing or able to participate in study and follow-ups
- Patients who use assisted devices to ambulate
- Rheumatoid arthritis
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Medial Parapatellar Approach
Primary total knee arthroplasty performed using the medial parapatellar surgical approach
|
Incision splitting quad
|
|
Active Comparator: Subvastus Approach
Primary total knee arthroplasty performed using the subvastus surgical approach
|
quad-sparing approach
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Step Count (steps/day)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Step Count (steps/day)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Recorded from patients iPhone Health App for 2 weeks preoperatively
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Stride Length (m)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Distance Travelled (km)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Functional Range of Motion (degrees)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Tibial Range of Motion (degrees)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Cadence (steps/minute)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Walking Speed (m/s)
Time Frame: Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
Continuously recorded from PIQ device after it is implanted during surgery
|
Through study completion, minimum 6 months
|
|
Goniometric Functional Range of Motion
Time Frame: Preoperatively and at 6 weeks
|
Measured in degrees using a goniometer
|
Preoperatively and at 6 weeks
|
|
Surgical Side
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
Left or Right
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Age
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
In years, from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Sex
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
Male or Female, from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Weight
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
In kg, from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Height
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
In cm, from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
in kg/m2, from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Comorbidities
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
Collected and listed from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)
Time Frame: Preoperatively
|
Calculated from formula using comorbidities collected from EMR
|
Preoperatively
|
|
Time to Achieving Key Milestones in Daily Activities
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Survey score collected (less time = better), Survey via Force Therapeutics
|
6 weeks postoperatively
|
|
Veterans Rand 12-Item (VR-12) Health Survey
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively
|
Mental and Physical component survey scores collected (0-100); Survey via Force Therapeutics
|
Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Procedure Satisfaction
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Survey score collected (0-5; 5 best), Survey via Force Therapeutics
|
6 weeks postoperatively
|
|
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively
|
Survey score collected (0-10; 0 best), Survey via Force Therapeutics
|
Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively
|
|
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR.)
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively
|
Survey score collected (0-100; 100 best), Survey via Force Therapeutics
|
Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Time Frame: Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively
|
Survey score collected (0-100; 100 best), Survey via Force Therapeutics
|
Preoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, 6 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kazarian GS, Siow MY, Chen AF, Deirmengian CA. Comparison of Quadriceps-Sparing and Medial Parapatellar Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
- Matsueda M, Gustilo RB. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Feb;(371):161-8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00020.
- Cila E, Guzel V, Ozalay M, Tan J, Simsek SA, Kanatli U, Ozturk A. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002 Mar;122(2):65-8. doi: 10.1007/s004020100319.
- Tomek IM, Kantor SR, Cori LA, Scoville JM, Grove MR, Morgan TS, Swarup I, Moschetti WE, Spratt KF. Early Patient Outcomes After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with Quadriceps-Sparing Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Techniques: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Jun 4;96(11):907-915. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01578. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
- Sukeik M, Sohail MZ, Hossain FS, AlShryda S, Powell J. Comparing the Sub-Vastus and Medial Parapatellar Approaches in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes. Dr Sulaiman Al Habib Med J. 2021;3(2):66. doi:10.2991/dsahmj.k.210203.001
- Khan MNH, Abbas K, Faraz A, Ilyas MW, Shafique H, Jamshed MH, Hashmi P. Total knee replacement: A comparison of the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Aug 8;68:102670. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102670. eCollection 2021 Aug.
- van Hemert WL, Senden R, Grimm B, van der Linde MJ, Lataster A, Heyligers IC. Early functional outcome after subvastus or parapatellar approach in knee arthroplasty is comparable. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jun;19(6):943-51. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1292-0. Epub 2010 Oct 17.
- Ambrosino C, Ubertalle A, Liberatori J, Sarra C. [Proteins of milk sera. VI. Research by microimmunodiffusion in agar gel on immunochemical behavior of the sera of cow, sheep, goat and buffalo milk]. Ric Sci 2 Ser Pt 2 Rend B. 1965 Apr-Jun;6(2):125-34. No abstract available. Italian.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2025
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 9, 2026
First Posted (Estimated)
January 16, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
January 16, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 9, 2026
Last Verified
January 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- NSH1432
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
Individual participant data will only be used as necessary by the authorized research team and always secured, it will not be shared
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Total Knee Anthroplasty
-
University Hospital, BonnNot yet recruitingTotal Knee AnthroplastyGermany
-
Maxx Orthopedics IncNot yet recruitingKnee Osteoarthristis | Total Knee AnthroplastyUnited States
-
Dr. Renate ListCompleted
-
Bursa City HospitalUlusoy, Emre, M.D.CompletedTotal Knee AnthroplastyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalActive, not recruitingTotal Knee AnthroplastyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedTotal Knee AnthroplastyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Ermi LLCRecruitingJoint Contractures | Total Knee Anthroplasty | Knee ArthrofibrosisUnited States
-
San Giovanni di Dio HospitalRecruitingRegional Anesthesia | Total Knee AnthroplastyItaly
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompletedRobotic Surgery | Total Knee AnthroplastyChina
-
Sakarya UniversityNot yet recruitingEpidural Analgesia | Total Knee AnthroplastyTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Total Knee Arthroplasty Medial Parapatellar Approach
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUniversity of Campinas, BrazilUnknown
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedTotal Knee ArthroplastyTurkey
-
Queen Margaret UniversityDePuy International; Royal Infirmary of EdinburghCompletedOsteoarthritisUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRecruitingComparison of Pivotal Medial Polyethylene Versus Ultra-congruent in Total Knee Arthroplasty (MEPCAT)Gonarthrosis | Total Knee Replacement | Primary Knee ReplacementFrance
-
Sinai Hospital of BaltimoreBonutti ClinicCompletedTotal Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityCompleted
-
Medacta USACompleted
-
Northwest Surgical Specialists, VancouverStryker MAKO Surgical CorpTerminated
-
Elda University HospitalUniversidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisSpain
-
University College, LondonStryker InstrumentsRecruitingOsteo Arthritis Knee | Surgery | Unicompartmental Knee ReplacementUnited Kingdom