A Comparison of Outcome of Pulpotomy on Immature Permanent Molars Between Different Calcium Silicate-based Materials : a 12 Months Clinical Study

January 9, 2026 updated by: Saint-Joseph University

Preservation of pulp vitality through vital pulp therapy (VPT) has emerged in contemporary endodontics, particularly for immature permanent teeth. In cases of irreversible pulpitis, recent literature suggests that clinical symptoms do not always correlate with histopathological findings, supporting the use of conservative approaches such as full pulpotomy. This is especially relevant in young patients where continued root development and apical closure are critical for long-term tooth integrity and functionality. Immature teeth, due to their high cellularity and vascularity, exhibit a greater regenerative capacity, making them indicated for biologically based treatments.

Among the materials used for VPT, calcium silicate-based cements (CSCs) have demonstrated good biological and physicochemical properties, including high biocompatibility, antimicrobial effects, alkaline pH, and sustained release of calcium ions that stimulate biomineralization. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) has long been considered the gold standard; however, it is associated with several clinical limitations such as extended setting time, complex handling, and potential tooth discoloration. To address these drawbacks, newer generation premixed bioceramics have been introduced. These include NeoPUTTY®, Total Fill® BC UNIVERSAL RRM™, and Bio-C® Repair, each exhibiting unique compositional and functional properties designed to enhance clinical performance and ease of use.

Despite promising individual results, no clinical study has yet compared these three materials within the context of pulpotomy in immature permanent molars with irreversible pulpitis. This randomized clinical trial aims to fill this gap by evaluating their clinical and radiographic outcomes over a 12-month period, to better guide material selection in vital pulp therapy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Universite Saint Joseph de Beyrouth

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • -Healthy patients (according to ASA classification) with noncontributory medical history.
  • Patients aged between 7 and 11 years of age, with at least one immature permanent molar with deep caries, needing full pulpotomy.
  • Cooperative pediatric patients (Frankl's behavioral rating scale).
  • Restorable immature permanent molar with deep caries: caries involving the pulpal roof or where complete caries removal would likely result in pulpal exposure.
  • Physiological mobility.
  • Vital pulp (detected by clinical signs/symptoms) presenting symptoms classically indicative of irreversible pulpitis according to AAE diagnostic criteria : positive but heightened response to cold sensibility testing, presence of spontaneous pain.
  • No clinical signs of pulp necrosis; absence of a sinus tract or swelling.
  • Patients who agree to return for periodic examination (follow-up).
  • Patients who are willing to sign the consent form (written informed consent).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • -Medically compromised patients.
  • Patients older than 11 years or younger than 7 years of age.
  • Mature permanent molar.
  • No signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
  • No pulp exposure even after complete caries excavation.
  • Clinical signs of pulp necrosis on the tooth to be treated, such as insufficient bleeding or no bleeding after pulp exposure.
  • Uncontrollable pulp hemorrhage (more than 10 minutes of hemostasis).
  • Teeth previously endodontically treated.
  • Teeth with pathological root resorption.
  • Impossibility to place a rubber dam.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neo PUTTY (Nusmile Inc, Houston, TX; USA)
premixed bioactive bioceramic composed of an inorganic powder containing tricalcium and dicalcium silicate in a water-free organic liquid.
To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet compared these three biomaterials in the treatment of permanent molars with incomplete root development.
Active Comparator: Total Fill® BC UNIVERSAL RRM™ (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland)
premixed bioceramic material composed of calcium aluminosilicate paste designed for permanent root canal repair and surgical applications.
To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet compared these three biomaterials in the treatment of permanent molars with incomplete root development.
Active Comparator: Bio-C® Repair (BCR; Angelus, Londrina, Brazil)
new ready-to-use bioceramic repair material. Bio-C has indications similar to MTA and is composed of calcium silicates [tricalcium silicate, dicalcium silicate], tricalcium aluminate, calcium oxide (for the release of calcium ions), and zirconium oxide as a radioopacifier.
To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet compared these three biomaterials in the treatment of permanent molars with incomplete root development.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
-Root formation and apical closure.
Time Frame: 12 months

Continued root formation and apical closure will be assessed using standardized periapical radiographs of the treated immature permanent molars and classified according to Cvek's stages of root development. Radiographic evaluation will be performed by a calibrated examiner. Progression in root development will be determined by changes in root length and apical foramen morphology compared with baseline.

Cvek's classification includes five radiographic stages of root development:

Stage I (A): < 1/2 root length

Stage II (B): 1/2 root length

Stage III (C): 2/3 root length

Stage IV (D): Nearly complete root length with wide open apical foramen

Stage V (E): Complete root development with closed apical foramen

12 months
-Postoperative pain. -Percussion and/or palpation pain.
Time Frame: 12 months

Pain response will be recorded as a binary outcome (Yes/No) based on the patient's subjective report during standardized clinical examination. The assessment will be performed by a calibrated examiner using gentle vertical percussion and periapical palpation according to routine endodontic diagnostic procedures.

Measurement Tool

Clinical percussion test

Clinical palpation test

Patient-reported pain response during examination (verbal report) Postoperative pain assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), recorded by the patient.

12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
-Presence of periapical lesion.
Time Frame: 12 months
Presence of periapical lesion assessed on standardized periapical radiographs using the Periapical Index (PAI); lesions defined as a PAI score ≥ 3.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 27, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 27, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Neo PUTTY (Nusmile Inc, Houston, TX; USA)

Subscribe