Metaphors to Enhance Antibiotic Appropriate Use Knowledge and Behaviours to Reduce Educational Disparities

January 20, 2026 updated by: Bo Yan

Metaphors to Enhance Antibiotic Appropriate Use Knowledge and Behaviours to Reduce Educational Disparities Among Chinese Parents: A Survey-experimental Study

A randomized controlled survey experiment was conducted from October to November 2024 to assess the effectiveness of metaphor-based health education in improving Chinese parents' knowledge and behavioural intentions regarding appropriate antibiotic use. A total of 866 parents from two Chinese provinces were randomly assigned to either a metaphorical message group (n = 432) or a conventional message group (n = 434). Metaphors included comparing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to insect resistance to pesticides, improper antibiotic disposal to mercury battery pollution, and antibiotic-free foods to organic foods. Outcomes measured were AMR knowledge, willingness to pay (WTP) for antibiotic-free foods, and proper antibiotic disposal intention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To assess the influence of metaphorical and conventional health education messages on the AMR-related knowledge and behavioural intentions of rural and urban residents, the investigators conducted a survey experimental study across two provinces in China. Prior to receiving any health education message, the respondents completed questions on AMR-related knowledge, behaviours, and behavioural intentions. Subsequently, participants were randomly assigned to read either metaphorical or conventional health education messages. Following the reading of assigned message, the respondents once again completed the questions on AMR-related knowledge and behavioural intentions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

866

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 311121
        • Zhejiang University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult child parent, willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • declining to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: metaphorical messages group
The metaphorical messages, by contrast, were crafted to be more accessible, drawing on familiar daily-life analogies derived from our prior qualitative research. We created three specific pairs: the first explained mechanisms of AMR, comparing resistant bacteria to pesticide-resistant insects. The second addressed environmental contamination by likening antibiotics to mercury batteries. The third used the analogy of "organic" food to convey the concept of antibiotic-free animal foods.
We created three specific pairs: the first explained mechanisms of AMR, comparing resistant bacteria to pesticide-resistant insects. The second addressed environmental contamination by likening antibiotics to mercury batteries. The third used the analogy of "organic" food to convey the concept of antibiotic-free animal foods. All metaphorical messages were reviewed by a panel of experts in public health, clinical microbiology, health communication, and health education to ensure factual consistency and clarity.
Placebo Comparator: conventional messages group
The conventional messages were adapted from formal health communication sources, such as the World Health Organization and the Chinese National Health Commission, and retained the technical tone typical of official health education materials (China NHC, 2010; He, 2018; WHO, 2022).
The conventional messages were adapted from formal health communication sources, such as the World Health Organization and the Chinese National Health Commission, and retained the technical tone typical of official health education materials (China NHC, 2010; He, 2018; WHO, 2022).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
knowledge
Time Frame: Immediately after the 30-second message exposure.
Three items were summed to form the AMR-related knowledge scale. This scale was assessed by asking respondents to judge the correctness of the following statements before and after their first exposure to health education message: (1) Does antimicrobial resistance imply that bacteria are becoming increasingly difficult to kill with antibiotics? (2) Dose overuse of antibiotics lead to antimicrobial resistance? (3) Can antimicrobial resistant be transmitted between people?
Immediately after the 30-second message exposure.
Willingness to pay for antibiotic-free animal food
Time Frame: Immediately after the 30-second message exposure.
Respondents were asked whether they were willing to pay a higher price for antibiotic-free animal foods compared to regular animal- foods. Their answers were dichotomized into "Yes" and "No/Not Sure".
Immediately after the 30-second message exposure.
antibiotic disposal intention
Time Frame: Immediately after the 30-second message exposure.
To evaluate antibiotic disposal practices, participants were asked to recall how they had handled expired or unused antibiotic prior to receiving a third exposure to health education message.
Immediately after the 30-second message exposure.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ZGL202403-3
  • 72004194 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Natural Science Foundation of China)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Available on request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Antimicrobial Resistance

Clinical Trials on metaphorical messages

Subscribe