- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07389213
Efficacy and Safety of rTMS Combined With HA in the Treatment of Cognitive Decline in Aged Related Hearing Loss
Efficacy and Safety of rTMS Combined With HA in the Treatment of Cognitive Decline in Aged Related Hearing Loss: A Single-Center Real-World Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Yang Haidi, PhD
- Phone Number: 13178821663
- Email: yanghaidi1978@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 5100000
- Recruiting
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
-
Contact:
- Haidi Yang, PhD
- Phone Number: 020-81332449
- Email: yanghaidi1978@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥50 years and ≤85 years, regardless of gender.
- Diagnosed with age-related hearing loss (ARHL), characterized by symmetrical, slowly progressing hearing loss primarily affecting high frequencies, along with decreased speech recognition ability due to aging. This is in accordance with the "Expert Consensus on Diagnosis and Intervention of Age-Related Hearing Loss" 2019 edition.(Only ARHL-nonHA group and ARHL-HA group)
- The better ear has moderate, moderately severe, or severe hearing loss (based on the 2021 WHO hearing classification standards, i.e., PTA between 35~79dB).
- Wearing hearing aids for more than half a year, with daily wearing time exceeding 7.2 hours; (Only ARHL-HA group)
- Chinese nationals who can complete all assessments in Chinese.
- Right-handed.
- Educational level of at least 6 years.
- Informed consent obtained, agreeing to participate in the trial with no plans to relocate within one year.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Exclusion of hearing loss due to noise, genetics, ototoxic drugs, or other non-age-related causes;
- History of central nervous system disorders such as cerebral infarction, stroke, epilepsy, or traumatic brain injury;
- Diagnosis of dementia or other neurodegenerative diseases that affect compliance with the study;
- Presence of major neurological disorders, severe systemic diseases, family history of hereditary conditions, or major psychiatric disorders;
- Contraindications to MRI;
- Contraindications to rTMS.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ARHL-nonHA group
This study will use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an intervention.
Participants will be right-handed Chinese individuals aged between 50 and 85 years, diagnosed with moderate to severe age-related hearing loss (pure-tone average PTA of the better ear ranging from 35 to 79 dB), meeting the diagnostic criteria outlined in the 2019 expert consensus.
Eligible participants must have at least 6 years of education and be able to complete all assessments in the Chinese version.
|
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates neural activity by delivering magnetic pulses to specific regions of the cerebral cortex.
In this study, 50 Hz high-frequency stimulation will be used to enhance neuronal excitability, with stimulation intensity set at 80%-100% of the individual's motor threshold (MT) to accommodate the tolerance of elderly patients.
Using each participant's MRI for neuronavigation, the stimulation coil will be precisely positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
Stimulation will be administered while the patient is awake, with each session lasting 9 minutes, delivered once daily.
A single treatment course consists of 14 consecutive days, and a total of two courses will be conducted.
Patient status will be closely monitored throughout the intervention to ensure safety and accuracy.
|
|
Experimental: ARHL-HA group
This study will use repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an intervention.
Participants will be right-handed Chinese individuals aged between 50 and 85 years, diagnosed with moderate to severe age-related hearing loss (pure-tone average PTA of the better ear ranging from 35 to 79 dB).Participants must have been wearing hearing aids for more than six months and use them for over 7.2 hours daily.
Eligible participants must have at least 6 years of education and be able to complete all assessments in the Chinese version.
|
High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates neural activity by delivering magnetic pulses to specific regions of the cerebral cortex.
In this study, 50 Hz high-frequency stimulation will be used to enhance neuronal excitability, with stimulation intensity set at 80%-100% of the individual's motor threshold (MT) to accommodate the tolerance of elderly patients.
Using each participant's MRI for neuronavigation, the stimulation coil will be precisely positioned over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
Stimulation will be administered while the patient is awake, with each session lasting 9 minutes, delivered once daily.
A single treatment course consists of 14 consecutive days, and a total of two courses will be conducted.
Patient status will be closely monitored throughout the intervention to ensure safety and accuracy.
|
|
No Intervention: HC group
Aged between 50 and 85 years, with no gender restriction; pure-tone average (PTA) ≤25 dB HL in the better ear; Chinese nationality, able to complete all Chinese-version assessments; right-handed; and with at least 6 years of education.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA ) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function; a score of 26 or above is generally considered normal. The overall cognitive function in all groups with hearing loss was assessed using the MoCA scale before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is scored on a scale from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. Overall cognitive function was assessed in all groups using the MMSE before and after the intervention, and the change scores were calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Pure-Tone Average(PTA) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Pure-Tone Average (PTA) is calculated as the mean hearing threshold (in decibels hearing level, dB HL) at 500 Hz, 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz before and after intervention in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group was assessed using pure-tone audiometry and sound field audiometry, and the difference was calculated.
|
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Speech Reception Threshold(SRT) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Speech Reception Threshold (SRT) is the lowest intensity levelat which a person correctly identifies 50% of spondaic (two-syllable) words were correctly identified before and after intervention in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group was assessed using speech audiometry and sound field speech audiometry, and the difference was calculated.
|
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) is scored based on the time (in seconds) required to complete the task, with lower scores indicating better attention and information processing speed. The attention and information processing speed in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group were assessed using the TMT-A before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Trail Making Test Part B (TMT-B) is scored based on the time (in seconds) required to complete the task, with lower scores indicating better set-shifting ability and executive function. The set-shifting component of executive function in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group was assessed using the TMT-B before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Digit Span Test (DST)improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Digit Span Test (DST) is scored as the total number of correctly recalled digit sequences, with a typical total raw score ranging from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate better attention, short-term memory, and working memory. Attention, short-term memory, and working memory in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group were assessed using the DST before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) is typically scored based on the time (in seconds) required to complete specific conditions .Lower completion times or lower interference scores indicate better inhibitory control and faster information processing speed, meaning lower values represent a better outcome. The inhibitory control of dominant responses and information processing speed, as components of executive function, in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group were assessed using the SCWT before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) is scored by summing the number of depressive symptom responses, with total scores ranging from 0 (no depressive symptoms) to 15 (most severe depressive symptoms). Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms. Depressive symptom scores in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group were assessed using the GDS-15 before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24)improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) is a clinician-administered measure of depressive symptom severity, with total scores ranging from 0 to 76. Higher scores indicate more severe depression. Depressive symptom scores in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group were assessed using the HAMD-24 before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) improvement value
Time Frame: Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire that assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a one-month period. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. Sleep scores in the ARHL-HA group and the ARHL-nonHA group were assessed using the PSQI before and after intervention, and the difference was calculated. |
Baseline、Post-intervention 2 weeks and Post-intervention 1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Yang Haidi, PhD, SunYatSunU2H
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SYSKY-2025-525-01
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Senile Deadness
-
Carl Zeiss Meditec AGCompleted
-
Carl Zeiss Meditec AGRecruitingCataract SenileSpain, Bulgaria, Czechia, Romania
-
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular SurgeryRecruiting
-
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityBeijing Tongren Hospital; Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University; The First Affiliated... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitation
-
Taipei Nobel Eye ClinicCompletedCataract SenileTaiwan
-
Wendell ScottJohnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc.CompletedCataract SenileUnited States
-
Carl Zeiss Meditec AGCompletedCataract SenileRomania
-
Carl Zeiss Meditec AGCompleted
-
Johannes Kepler University of LinzCompleted
-
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular SurgeryCompleted
Clinical Trials on repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceCompletedPost-traumatic Stress DisorderFrance
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.RecruitingBipolar II Disorder, Most Recent Episode Major DepressiveTaiwan
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandNot yet recruitingMigraine | rTMS StimulationFrance
-
Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, FranceRecruiting
-
Yi YangNot yet recruiting
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesUnknownBorderline Personality Disorder
-
University Hospital, CaenRecruitingSchizophrenia; PsychosisFrance
-
University of Southern CaliforniaRecruitingInterstitial Cystitis | Bladder Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
University of AarhusCentral Denmark Region; Hammel Neurorehabilitation Centre and University Research...Active, not recruitingConcussion, Mild | Post-Traumatic Headache | MTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryDenmark