PVI Alone Versus PVI Plus PWI and SVCI With PFA (PVI-PLUS)

February 4, 2026 updated by: Edward Gerstenfeld, MD

A Randomized Trial of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation Plus Posterior Wall and Superior Vena Cava Isolation With Pulsed Field Ablation for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter based ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established treatment modality for rhythm control of AF, with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) being the cornerstone of this technique. While pulmonary vein triggers are the predominant arrhythmia mechanism in paroxysmal AF, development of additional atrial substrate contributes to maintenance of AF in persistent AF. This is likely to account for the lower rates of freedom from recurrent AF following ablation in patients with persistent AF. Various adjunctive empiric ablation strategies, such as left atrial posterior wall isolation (PWI), superior vena cava isolation (SVCI), linear ablation, and ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms have been studied to address this limitation of PVI alone.

While observational data supports the safety and feasibility of Posterior Wall Isolation (PWI) and Superior Vena Cava Isolation (SVCI) with PFA, the efficacy of these strategies with PFA has not been demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. Whether mapping prior to ablation (i.e. detecting scar) predicts if PW and SVC sites are effective in improving ablation outcome is unknown.

This study will test the hypothesis of whether empiric addition of PW and SVC isolation with PFA to PVI improves outcome (freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1-year). The investigators therefore propose a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) alone versus PVI + PWI + SVCI in patients with persistent AF. The investigators hypothesize that the addition of PWI and SVCI to PVI in patients with persistent AF will provide improved freedom from AFIB off anti-arrhythmic drugs, without significantly increasing rates of procedural complications. Secondary analysis includes subgroups with posterior wall scar, procedure times, freedom from AFIB on or off anti arrhythmic drugs, etc.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years at their pre-procedure visit
  • Persistent AF, defined as at least one continuous AF episode lasting at least seven days in duration, documented by a continuous monitor or 2 ECGs>7 days apart or ≥3 cardioversions
  • Indicated and interested in ICM implant for monitoring post ablation
  • Written informed consent obtained from subject and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior atrial endocardial or epicardial ablation procedure, other than cavotricuspid isthmus ablation or supraventricular tachycardia
  • Stroke or transient ischemic attack within the previous six months
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding within the previous three months
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Longstanding persistent AF (> 3 years)
  • LA volume >80ml/m2
  • Atrial septal occlusion device
  • Current left atrial thrombus
  • Left atrial appendage occlusion or closure device < 6 mos or with leak or prior DRT
  • Mitral or Tricuspid valve clip or mechanical replacement or clip
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Contraindication to femoral vascular access
  • Congenital heart disease with residual anatomic abnormality
  • Contraindication to, or unwillingness to use, systemic anticoagulation
  • Pregnancy
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Baseline creatinine >2.0 mg/dL
  • Predicted life expectancy less than one year
  • Refusal to receive ICM implant or allergy to ICM

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PVI alone
Afib ablation: PVI only
PFA is FDA-approved for PVI and PWI. SVCI using PFA will be done for investigational purposes.
Implantation of implantable loop recorder during ablation procedure for continuous heart monitoring during follow up.
Experimental: PVI + PWI + SVCI
Afib ablation: PVI + PWI + SVCI
PFA is FDA-approved for PVI and PWI. SVCI using PFA will be done for investigational purposes.
Implantation of implantable loop recorder during ablation procedure for continuous heart monitoring during follow up.
Patients randomized to the 'PVI only' arm will be receiving an Afib ablation using PFA targeting the pulmonary veins for isolation (PVI). Following PVI, in those patients randomized to PVI+, PFA will also be used to isolate the left atrial posterior wall, and the superior vena cava.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AF freedom
Time Frame: 12 months
First recurrence of AT/AFL/AF > 1 hour after a 2-month blanking period Any 1) cardioversion 2) redo ablation or 3) escalation/change in AAD after the 2-month blanking period (allowing 3 months to stop AADs) is considered a failure of the primary endpoint
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Edward Gerstenfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 14, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 14, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 14, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on PFA

Subscribe