A Study Evaluating the Performance of Using AI Software and Chest X-rays to Screen for Osteoporosis as Compared to Standard DXA Scans in Patients 50 Years and Older

February 12, 2026 updated by: Promedius Inc

A Retrospective Multi-centre Paired Accuracy Study to Evaluate the Performance of Osteo Signal Against the Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening.

The goal of this study is to assess the performance of an artificial intelligence software (Osteo Signal) in detecting osteoporosis risk in adults 50 years and older. The main question it aims to answer is: What is the accuracy of the software in detecting osteoporosis risk on chest x-ray images as compared to the standard technique of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)? There is no direct involvement of participants in this study as it will use data from individuals who have already had a chest x-ray and a DXA scan taken in the past.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

595

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GD
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam,
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jacob J Visser, Musculoskeletal Radiologist
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 4DG
        • Recruiting
        • Barts Health NHS Trust
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Giuseppe Ruocco
    • Essex
      • Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, United Kingdom, SS0 0RY
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anupama C Nandagudi, Consultant Rheumatologist

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients selected hospitals in the Netherlands and UK that have previously had chest x-rays and DXA scans

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥50 years at the time of chest X-ray
  2. Availability of

    1. Posteroanterior (PA) Chest X-ray and
    2. DXA scan with a valid T-score measurement where both the DXA scan and Chest x-ray examinations were performed within 6 months (182 days) of each other and
    3. Available X-ray and DXA scans performed on or after 01-Jan-2010.
  3. Complete metadata (sex and age) available on PACS or hospital records.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-diagnostic Quality or Incomplete Imaging of:

    1. DXA scan inadequacy: Missing T-score from a technically inadequate scan.
    2. PA Chest X-ray technical inadequacy: Non-PA projection, significant motion artefacts, inadequate visualisation of thoracic structures, or missing DICOM metadata.
    3. Image format incompatibility: Non-DICOM format or corrupted image files that would prevent AI analysis
    4. PA Chest X-ray > ±6 months from the date of the DXA scan.
  2. Previous diagnosis or treatment of Osteoporosis prior to the DXA scan used in the Study.

    1. diagnosis of osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5), or current/recent anti- osteoporotic medications, within 12 months prior to the DXA scan used in the study.
    2. Current or recent anti-osteoporotic medications for 3 months (91 days) continuously prior to the Chest x-ray used in the Study.
  3. Diagnosis of any metabolic bone disease prior to the DXA scan used in the study.
  4. Diagnosis of metabolic bone disease other than Osteoporosis or Osteopenia, up to a maximum of 3 months (91 days) after the DXA scan.
  5. Major Chest Wall or Spinal Deformities, including but not limited to:

    1. Severe structural deformities: Thoracic scoliosis with Cobb angle >40°, severe kyphosis, or chest wall deformities (pectus excavatum/carinatum) affecting >30% of the thoracic cage.
    2. Surgical hardware: Previous thoracic/spinal surgery with metallic implants obscuring anatomical landmarks required for AI analysis.
    3. Pathological conditions: Extensive pulmonary consolidation, pleural effusion, lesions or masses obscuring >30% of thoracic skeletal structures
  6. Subject has opted out of confidential data being used for research purposes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Two class bone status classification (osteoporosis/non osteoporosis)
Time Frame: At a time following the participant having had a chest x-ray and DXA scan within 6 months of each other
Device output against the lowest DXA as measured by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC)
At a time following the participant having had a chest x-ray and DXA scan within 6 months of each other

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Three class bone status classification (osteoporosis/osteopenia/normal)
Time Frame: At a time following the participant having had a chest x-ray and DXA scan within 6 months of each other
Device output against the lowest DXA as measured by area under the ROC curve (AUC), overall per cent agreement, and weighted Cohen's kappa
At a time following the participant having had a chest x-ray and DXA scan within 6 months of each other
Classification for osteoporosis and osteopenia
Time Frame: At a time following the participant having had a chest x-ray and DXA scan within 6 months of each other
Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for osteoporosis and osteopenia classifications
At a time following the participant having had a chest x-ray and DXA scan within 6 months of each other

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacob J Visser, Musculoskeletal Radiologist, Erasmus Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No IPD will be shared. The trial data is proprietary and part of a product development program.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoporosis, Osteopenia

Clinical Trials on Osteo Signal

Subscribe