- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07432555
Testing a Mobile Health Application to Improve HIV Prevention and Substance Use Treatment Among Women Involved in the Carceral System (PA-Links)
Development and Pilot Testing of a Mobile Health Application to Improve HIV Prevention and Substance Use Treatment Service Access Among Women Involved in the Carceral System
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The primary goal of the proposed research is to pilot test a systematically developed intervention for women who have been recently incarcerated to engage with pre-exposure prophalaxis (PrEP) and medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) to prevent HIV infection and overdose. The intervention will use contextually relevant messages developed through novel formative research methods and be embedded in a web-based application called PA Links. The investigators will then test this approach in a pilot randomized trial with women who have recently been incarcerated. The purpose is to enhance communication in an existing post-release navigation model embedded in a community-based health services organization in Pennsylvania (Philadelphia FIGHT) to increase PrEP and MOUD uptake.
The app is meant to enhance communication among navigators, patients, and providers, as well as provide easy communication channels among participants for peer support. We will examine the feasibility/acceptability of the intervention with more traditional navigation support and examine preliminary data regarding its potential efficacy in engaging women in PrEP and MOUD.
For the pilot test, we will: 1. Conduct a pilot test with women who have recently been incarcerated (n=60) in Philadelphia randomized to an "Enhanced" intervention that includes patient navigation with the PA-Links web-based app + navigation, compared to a "Basic" intervention that includes existing navigation. To assess promise of efficacy, we will compare linkage to PrEP and MOUD (primary outcomes) during the three-month intervention at immediate post and 3-month follow-up and assess self-reported knowledge and attitudes. Qualitative exit interviews will inform feasibility and acceptability.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Sarah Bass, MPH, PhD
- Phone Number: 215-204-0377
- Email: sbass@temple.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Emily F Dauria, PhD
- Phone Number: 412-383-0732
- Email: efd16@pitt.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19122
- Temple University
-
Contact:
- Sarah Bass, MPH, PhD
- Phone Number: 2152040377
- Email: sbass@temple.edu
-
Contact:
- Katie J Singley, MPH
- Phone Number: 215-204-1956
- Email: katie.singley@temple.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sarah Bass, MPH
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 of years of age or older
- Self-identified woman
- Previous experience (past six months) with the carceral system (jail, prison, on parole or under supervision)
- Speaks and reads English
- Self-reported negative HIV status
- Indicates at least one HIV risk (i.e. any of the following in the past 6 months or in the six months prior to the most recent incarceration that call for consideration of PrEP as per the CDC risk indices: have engaged in condomless sex; have an HIV-positive sex partner; have had an STI; have had multiple [>6] partners; have engaged in transactional sex; have injected drugs, shared injection or drug use preparation equipment, or have been enrolled in opiate substitution therapy because of IDU; previous overdose)
- Self-report using opioids in the past six months or six months prior to the most recent incarceration (prescription or not) OR self-report using medications for opioid use disorder in the past year.
- Have access to the internet through some device - smart phone, computer or tablet (personal or at community location such as library or organization)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years old
- Does not read or speak English
- Does not identify as a woman
- Has been diagnosed with HIV
- Does not have previous experience with the criminal legal system within the last 6 months
- Does not have HIV risk in last six months or six months prior to being incarcerated
- Has not used opioids in past six months or six months prior to being incarcerated or MOUD in last year
- Does not have access to internet
- Cannot provide informed consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control Arm
For those participants randomized to the "Basic" arm of the intervention, standard of care navigation already provided by Philadelphia FIGHT will be provided, without the use of the PA Links application.
Each participant will be assigned a navigator or care coordinator who will assist people by scheduling initial/first appointments, making appointment reminder calls, coordinating services, providing education, and facilitating communication among FIGHT departments.
Navigation occurs from initial patient contact until the patient has their first visit.
Then a care coordinator is assigned, who assists patients in overcoming ongoing barriers to care and doing similar tasks as the navigators after the first visit.
Participants in the basic arm will thus receive all the services any other patient at FIGHT would receive.
|
|
|
Experimental: Intervention Arm
Women in the intervention arm will receive all the same navigation services at FIGHT along with access to the PA Links web-based app.
This app will enhance the usual care by: 1. Sending up the three resources every week based on a participant's interests and needs.
2. Providing one quiz a week.
At the beginning of each week of the intervention, participants will receive a pop-up message when they log in with a true/false question.
3. Sending at least two supportive messages a week.
4. Posting reminders and messages from navigators about appointments, medication use, or for other issues.
5. Being able to interact with other participants via an embedded communication widget.
|
The PA Links application is a web-based application (meaning it does not have to be downloaded to a smart phone and can be accessed via a URL link from any device connected to the Internet). This design ensures broader access and avoids excluding individuals without smartphones. This was developed along with our technology partner Nurelm (https://nurelm.com/). Women randomized to this arm of the intervention will go through an onboarding session to assist them in creating a unique login username and password to the PA Links system (see onboarding document attached). Only those with a registered username and password can access and use the PA Links system and Nurelm will not be able to access the application after it is "live" for the pilot RCT. The application will be housed on the AWS server, which also does not have access to data or information in the app.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) linkage
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Assess via medical record whether participant has been linked to PrEP services.
Yes/No
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
|
Medications for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) Linkage
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Assess via medical record whether participant has been linked to MOUD services.
Yes/No
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Engagement with intervention
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Number and types of contact with navigator.
Gotten from app data and EMR navigator reports
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
|
Usability of PA-Links
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
User logs on what parts of application were used most; Survey questions asking which parts of app they used, yes/no.
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
|
PrEP treatment referral
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Accepted referral to PrEP.
Data from FIGHT EMR.
Yes/no
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
MOUD treatment referral
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Accepted MOUD treatment referral.
Data from FIGHT EMR.
Yes/No
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
HIV Risk
Time Frame: Baseline, before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Self reported HIV behavior risk.
Using the HIV Risk-Taking Behavior Scale.
This scale is 11 items, assessing drug use and sexual behavior risk.
Responses to each item are coded on a 6-point scale from 0 to 5, with higher values associated with more risky behaviors.
Summary scores are obtained by adding up the ordinal values of responses obtained; a score of 0 would indicate no risky behaviors and a score of 55 would indicate maximal risky behaviors.
|
Baseline, before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
Overdose risk
Time Frame: Baseline, before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Overdose risk and experience during intervention.
Based on the Overdose Risk self-assessment, participants are asked about overdose risks answering yes or no.
The more yes responses indicates a higher overdose risk.
|
Baseline, before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
PrEP perceptions
Time Frame: Baseline, before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Perceptions of barriers and benefits to PrEP use.
Study created scales - 12 statements on the benefits of using PrEP and 12 statements on barriers to using PrEP, answered on a zero -10 scale.
Higher numbers mean higher agreement with the statement.
These will be compared at the time points to assess if there is an increase in perceived benefits and a decrease in perceived barriers.
|
Baseline, before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
MOUD perceptions
Time Frame: Baseline before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month intervention followup (6 months)
|
Perceptions of barriers and benefits to MOUD use.
Study created scales - 11 statements on the benefits of using MOUD and 10 statements on barriers to using MOUD, answered on a zero -10 scale.
Higher numbers mean higher agreement with the statement.
These will be compared at the time points to assess if there is an increase in perceived benefits and a decrease in perceived barriers.
|
Baseline before intervention begins; Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month intervention followup (6 months)
|
|
Time to Linkage of PrEP
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Time in months from navigator first contact to linkage to PrEP.
EMR data from FIGHT.
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
Receipt of prescription of PrEP
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Receipt of prescription of PrEP.
EMR data from FIGHT.
Yes/no
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
Filling of PrEP prescription
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
If PrEP prescription was filled.
EMR data from FIGHT.
Yes/No
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
PrEP adherence
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 months intervention follow up (6 months)
|
Assess if participant is being adherent to PrEP based on FIGHT EMR data.
Could be physician notes or blood work results, if taken.
Yes/No
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 months intervention follow up (6 months)
|
|
PrEP knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate intervention post-test (3 months); 3 month intervention follow-up (6 months)
|
True/False statements about PrEP.
Five statements about PrEP.
A composite score based on the number of correct answers will be assessed and compared across timepoints.
|
Baseline; Immediate intervention post-test (3 months); 3 month intervention follow-up (6 months)
|
|
Time to MOUD Linkage
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
Time in months from navigator first contact to linkage to MOUD.
EMR data from FIGHT.
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); Three month post intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
Receipt of MOUD Prescription
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 month post intervention follow-up (6 months)
|
Receipt of MOUD prescription.
EMR data from FIGHT.
Yes/no
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 month post intervention follow-up (6 months)
|
|
Filling of MOUD prescription
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 months intervention follow up (6 months)
|
Filling of MOUD prescription.
EMR data from FIGHT.
Yes/no
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 months intervention follow up (6 months)
|
|
MOUD adherence
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 months intervention follow up (6 months)
|
Assess if participant in adherent to MOUD based on FIGHT EMR data.
Could be from physician notes or blood work, if taken.
Yes/No
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months); 3 months intervention follow up (6 months)
|
|
MOUD Knowledge
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediate intervention post -test (3 months); 3 month intervention follow-up (six months)
|
True/False statements about MOUD.
Five statements about MOUD.
A composite score based on the number of correct answers will be assessed and compared across timepoints.
|
Baseline; Immediate intervention post -test (3 months); 3 month intervention follow-up (six months)
|
|
Client Intervention Satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Assessed via survey using five items from the the Study Participant Feedback Questionnaire.
Two items are yes/no answers.
Yes answers indicate they agree they were informed about the study.
Three questions are on a 0-4 scale, with a zero indicating they strongly disagree with the statement and a 4 that they strongly agree.
Higher number answers indicate higher intervention satisfaction.
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
|
mHealth feasibility/satisfaction
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Assessed using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ).
It is a 21 item scale, with 8 items that assess Ease of use and satisfaction; 6 items on system information arrangement, and 7 items on usefulness.
All use a 1 to 7 scale, indicating amount of agreement with a 7 as strongly agree.
Each individual item will be assessed and a composite score for each area will also be assessed.
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
|
Usability of mHealth app
Time Frame: Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Assessed using the Usability of e-health interventions scale.
It consists of 10 items scored on a 1-5 scale, indicating level of agreement, with a 5 meaning they strongly agree with the statement.
The higher the score, the more they agree that the app was usable.
|
Immediate post intervention (3 months)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 30036
- 5R34DA057891-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV
-
Duke UniversityGilead SciencesRecruitingHIV Prevention | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis | HIV Prevention Program | HIV Prevention and Care | HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis UseUnited States
-
Federal University of São PauloGilead SciencesCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamMobile County Health Deparment; Alabama Department of Public HealthRecruitingHIV | HIV Testing | HIV Linkage to Care | HIV TreatmentUnited States
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingPrEP | HIV | HIV Prevention | PrEP UptakeUnited States
-
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation Foundation...National Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingHIV Prevention | PrEP Adherence | HIV Related StigmaThailand
-
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and...Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS FoundationCompletedPartner HIV Testing | Couple HIV Counseling | Couple Communication | HIV IncidenceCameroon, Dominican Republic, Georgia, India
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingFeasibility | HIV Prevention | PrEP Uptake | Acceptability | HIV Self-testing | Male Partners of HIV-negative Postpartum WomenSouth Africa
-
ANRS, Emerging Infectious DiseasesHopital Universitaire Robert-Debre; Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement and other collaboratorsUnknownHIV | HIV-uninfected Children | Children Exposed to HIVCameroon
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of BotswanaRecruitingPregnancy | HIV | Post-partum | HIV Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) AdherenceBotswana
Clinical Trials on Tool to provide re-entry support and improve linkage to healthcare and social services
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentPortland VA Medical CenterCompleted
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedPost-traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di ParmaNot yet recruitingCritical Care | Interprofessional Relations | Intensive Care Units | Attitude of Health Personnel | Interprofessional EducationItaly
-
Columbia UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Institute of HIV Research and Innovation Foundation...Recruiting