Do Video Recordings of Multidisciplinary Clinics Improve Quality of Life for People With ALS and Their Caregivers? (VITALS)

March 3, 2026 updated by: Paul J. Barr, Trustees of Dartmouth College

Comparing the Impact of Video Integration to Traditional Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Visit Communication on Patient and Caregiver Quality of Life

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, rare neurodegenerative disease affecting 30,000 people in the United States. The gold standard of care for people with ALS is multidisciplinary clinics (MDC). In these multidisciplinary clinics, which occur every 3 to 4 months, people with ALS see up to 12 different healthcare providers (e.g., speech therapy, physical therapy, the ALS doctor). These clinics can last from three to five hours, and across these three to five hours people with ALS and their caregivers receive a lot of information that is critical to the care and quality of life for people with ALS. However, this information can be difficult to remember given the large amount of information that is conveyed. The current standard for providing take-home information about the visit is to provide patients with a written after-visit summary and access to their doctor's notes about the visit, typically through the patient portal. This study tests whether providing participants with video recordings of their MDC visits improves their quality of life and the quality of life of their caregivers. The study will enroll 400 pairs of people with ALS and their caregivers from eight different sites in the United States. Half of the participants in the study will receive their after-visit summary notes (the NOTES condition) and the other half of the participants will receive both their summary notes, but will also receive video recordings of their MDC visits that they can watch on their own at home (the VIDEO condition). The study will last for 12 months, with participants receiving NOTES or VIDEO at each of their regularly-scheduled MDCs during the 12 months. The study will test whether caregiver and patient participants in the VIDEO condition experience better quality of life than those in the NOTES condition at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months from study enrollment. The results of this study will help determine what is the most effective approach to communicating MDC information to people with ALS and their caregivers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal, rare neurodegenerative disease affecting 30,000 people in the United States. People with ALS (pwALS) and their caregivers, attend 3 - 5 hour long multidisciplinary clinics (MDC) every 3 months where they meet with up to 12 specialists. The goal of treatment is to maintain pwALS quality of life (QOL). Optimal information from MDCs is necessary for the intensive at-home management which gets more complex as ALS progresses. Yet 40% of recommendations are forgotten by pwALS negatively impacting QOL, while caregivers report information deficits increasing caregiving burden. Patient portal access to MDC notes is standard, and can improve recall and health outcomes, yet concerns exist about their layout, comprehensiveness and challenges for people with low health literacy. An underutilized strategy to share MDC information is video recording. Systematic reviews find recordings improve health outcomes, and the use of video in an ALS context may be particularly helpful given complicated at-home management. The study will determine what is the most effective approach to communicating MDC information to facilitate optimal delivery of care for pwALS and their caregivers

STUDY AIMS

Aim 1. Assess the comparative effectiveness of written MDC visit information provided to pwALS and their caregivers via the patient portal (NOTES) versus NOTES plus visit video recording (VIDEO) on patient and caregiver quality of life.

Aim 2. Determine whether patient and caregiver health literacy and rapid ALS disease progression are modifying factors on the comparative effectiveness of NOTES versus VIDEO on primary outcomes.

Aim 3. Identify system and patient-level factors that impact the implementation and use of multimodal strategies of MDC information exchange by a diverse sample of pwALS, caregivers, clinicians and health system leaders.

Hypothesis (Main Effect): Compared to those receiving NOTES, pwALS randomized to also receive routine VIDEO recordings of their MDC visit will report better QOL via improved care-management (i.e., treatment adherence), self-management ability, satisfaction with communication and reduced healthcare utilization at 12 months; there will be larger relative benefits for pwALS, and caregivers, with low health literacy and rapid disease progression. The investigators also hypothesize that compared to NOTES alone, caregivers in the VIDEO arm will report better QOL, improved preparedness and less burden at 12 months.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

Overall study design

This study is a multisite, two-arm, parallel group, patient-randomized, controlled, comparative effectiveness trial with 12-month follow-up. Adopting a Hybrid Type 1 design, the investigators will also examine implementation barriers and facilitators using interviews guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research Framework 2.0.

Comparators

Comparator 1 (NOTES): After the initial MDC study staff will provide a 15-minute training to orient participants to the portal and how to access visit notes.

Comparator 2 (VIDEO): All MDC visits will be video-recorded over 12 months, using HealthPAL, an NIH-funded HIPAA-compliant personal health library developed by PI Barr. Participants in the VIDEO arm will receive orientation to the patient portal and HealthPAL.

Following each scheduled MDC, pwALS and caregivers in both groups will receive emails reminding them to watch the visit video recording and/or review their note: 1) within 48 hours of the visit to remind them of the visit discussion and self-management tasks they may have; and 2) 3 days before their next MDC visit to prepare for their next MDC visit.

Study Population

The study recruit 400 patient and caregiver pairs (400 pwALS and their 400 caregivers) from eight MDC sites (∼50 pairs per site): Dartmouth Health (Lebanon, NH), Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA), Mayo Clinics (Scottsdale, AZ, and Jacksonville, FL), Penn State Health (Hershey, PA), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Pittsburgh, PA), University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI) and Virginia Commonwealth University (Richmond, VA). The study will include pwALS, age ≥18 years, who plan to attend MDC visits for 12-months, speak English or Spanish, have ≥12 months projected survival, and internet access and their primary caregivers (family member or friend), ≥18 years who attends MDC visits or assist with their care.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes: For people with ALS, the total score on the ALSAQ-40 (a self report survey measure of quality of life for people with ALS) is the primary outcome. For caregivers, the total score on the PROMIS-10 (a self report survey measure of quality of life); Secondary outcomes include exercise adherence, medication adherence, adherence to MDC recommendations, self-management ability, patient satisfaction with communication, caregiver visit engagement, preparedness for caregiving, and caregiver burden. Exploratory outcomes include healthcare utilization.

Timeframe

Twelve-month follow-up for all outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

800

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephen Johnson, MD
        • Contact:
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Bjorn Oskarsson, MD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 021114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Suma Babu, MD
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark Garret, MD
        • Contact:
    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States, 17033
        • Penn State Health Milton S. Hersey Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Zachary Simmons, MD
        • Contact:
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Tawfiq Al Lahham, MD
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin Health
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Collin Kreple, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for People with ALS:

  • Diagnosis of ALS by either El- Escorial or Gold Coast Criteria
  • ≥18 years of age
  • Plan to attend MDC visits for 12 months
  • Speak English or Spanish
  • Presence of a caregiver (defined as someone who assists with care) who is also participating in the VITALS trial
  • Projected life expectancy of at least 12 months as determined by the site investigator.

Exclusion Criteria for People with ALS:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent or follow study procedures
  • Significant cognitive impairment, clinical dementia, or unstable psychiatric illness (including, but not limited to, psychosis, active suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, or untreated major depression) as determined by the site investigator
  • Current pregnancy based on participant self-report;
  • Unable to access the internet;
  • Do not have access to a personal or shared email and are not interested in creating a personal or shared email;
  • Do not wish to create a patient portal account, if they do not already have one;
  • Uncorrected hearing or visual impairment that would impair the ability to view video recordings;
  • Incarcerated.

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Agree to their identified role as a caregiver of a patient with ALS participating in the VITALS trial;
  • Speak English or Spanish;
  • ≥18 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Unable or unwilling to provide consent or follow study procedures;
  • Unable to access the internet;
  • Do not have access to a personal or shared email and are not interested in creating a personal or shared email;
  • Uncorrected hearing or visual impairment;
  • Professional caregiver for the patient;
  • Incarcerated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VIDEO
Participants in this arm of the study will have their multidisciplinary clinic visits video recorded and they will be able to access those video recordings on their own at home. They will also be able to access their doctor's notes and after visit summaries through their patient portal.
We will video record participants' multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) visits for 12 months. Participants will access the videos in HealthPAL, an NIH-funded, HIPAA-compliant personal health library developed with older adults and caregivers, available in Spanish and English. Each specialist visited with during the MDC will have a 'chapter' in HealthPAL that can be reviewed online at home by participants. Participants will receive orientation and training on both their patient portal and HealthPAL, including how to review and share their recordings using a take-home manual (an instructions video is also available in HealthPAL).
Participants will be given instruction on how to view their after-visit summaries and doctors' notes in their patient portal, as well as how to give other trusted family members or friends access to their visit notes.
Active Comparator: NOTES
Participants in this arm of the study will have their standard access to their doctor's notes and after visit summaries through their patient portal. They will also be provided with training on how to access and share access to their patient portal notes.
Participants will be given instruction on how to view their after-visit summaries and doctors' notes in their patient portal, as well as how to give other trusted family members or friends access to their visit notes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
For Caregiver Participants: the total score on the PROMIS-10 self report survey
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS-10) is a self-report measure of quality of life. The PROMIS-10 will be administered to caregivers via a secure online survey. We will analyze the total score on the PROMIS-10 as the primary outcome for caregiver participants.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
For Patient Participants: The total score on the ALSAQ-40 self report survey.
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ-40) is a self-report measure of quality of life for people with ALS. The ALSAQ-40 will be administered via a secure online survey.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Score on the Patient Activation Measure Short Form (PAM-SF)
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The PAM-SF is a self-reported measure of self-management ability. It will be administered to participants with ALS via a secure online survey.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS)
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The EARS is a self-report measure of exercise adherence. It will be administered to participants with ALS via a secure online survey.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS)
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The ARMS is a self-report measure of medication adherence. It will be administered to participants with ALS via a secure online survey.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Adherence to Multidisciplinary Clinic Recommendations
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Using a secure online survey, participants with ALS will indicate which of a list of possible clinic recommendations they received and the extent to which they adhered to those recommendations.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC) Survey
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The IPC is a self-report measure of satisfaction with the communication during a doctor visit. It will be administered via a secure online survey to participants with ALS.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Caregiver Perceptions About Communication with Clinical Team (CAPACITY) Survey
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
CAPACITY is a self-report measure of satisfaction with the communication during a doctor visit. It will be administered via a secure online survey to caregivers attending multidisciplinary clinic visits with the patient participants.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Preparedness for Caregiving Scale
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The Preparedness for Caregiving Scale is a self-report measure, completed by the caregiver, of the caregiver's self-perceived readiness to provide care across different domains (e.g., physical, emotional). It will be administered to caregivers via a secure online survey.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
Total Score on the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers - Short Form (BSFC)
Time Frame: Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.
The BSFC is a self-report measure of caregiver burden. It will be administered via a secure online survey to participant caregivers.
Administered at enrollment (baseline) and 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after enrollment.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of patient phone calls and patient portal messages to the clinical care team.
Time Frame: From enrollment to 12 months after enrollment.
Collected using the participant with ALS's electronic medical record.
From enrollment to 12 months after enrollment.
Total number of emergency room visits and hospitalizations.
Time Frame: From enrollment to 12 months after enrollment.
Collected from the participant with ALS's electronic medical record.
From enrollment to 12 months after enrollment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified non-video data that will be shared include demographic data (e.g., age, gender, language, race, ethnicity, income); information on use of the patient portal and video recordings; researcher field notes (e.g., if a caregiver is present at a visit, whether the visit was telehealth or in-person); participant-reported survey responses (e.g., assessments measuring cognitive function, health literacy, quality of life, adherence, self-management ability, caregiver burden, caregiver preparedness). We will also share raw video recordings of the participants' multidisciplinary clinic visits. Raw video recordings will not be accompanied by personal identifying information, but they will not be stripped of any visual or auditory features that could potentially identify an individual.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

We anticipate IPD data being available for sharing within 1 year of the study close (September 2031) in perpetuity.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be stored in a secured data archive. Access to the data will be restricted and available only upon request from researchers with a clear research plan for the data, whom have IRB approval, and the training and resources to carry out the research plan.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Clinical Trials on Video recording

Subscribe