Lifestyle Medicine for Enhancing Psychological Wellness in Police Officers

March 9, 2020 updated by: Fiona YY Ho, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Lifestyle Medicine for Enhancing Psychological Wellness in Police Officers: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

This study will examine the feasibility and efficacy of lifestyle medicine for the enhancement of psychological wellness in police officers. The integrative lifestyle intervention is based on the "Healthy Body Healthy Mind (HBHM)" programme developed by the University of Melbourne. It includes lifestyle psychoeducation, physical activity, nutrition and diet, relaxation/ mindfulness, and sleep. These components are weaved with psychological elements such as stress management, cognitive restructuring, motivational interviewing, and goal setting strategies that are led by clinical psychologists. While lifestyle medicine has been recognised for centuries a a mean to improve physical health, the field of lifestyle medicine in the context of mental health is still in its infancy. Nevertheless, there is increasing evidence demonstrating the efficacy of individual components of lifestyle medicine (e.g. diet, physical activities, and sleep) on mood and stress management. With a well-researched lifestyle medicine programme adopted from Australia, the research team of the Chinese University of Hong Kong has customised the intervention protocol to fit the Chinese culture, and has conducted a pilot trial to test the protocol across different communities and work populations. The investigators aim to examine the effectiveness of an integration of multiple lifestyle adjustments on psychological wellness from a holistic body-mind perspective. Acknowledging that police officers are one of hte work populations with stressful work nature, it is in a hope that lifestyle medicine would be effective to facilitate stress coping and enhance the psychological wellness of police officers in the long run.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Hong Kong residents aged ≥ 18 years;
  2. Cantonese language fluency;
  3. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10; and
  4. Willingness to provide informed consent and comply with the trial protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy;
  2. Have suicidal ideation with PHQ-9 item 9 score ≥ 2 (referral information to professional services will be provided to those who endorsed items on suicidal ideation);
  3. Using medication or psychotherapy for depression;
  4. Having unsafe conditions and are not recommended for exercising or a change in diet by physicians; and
  5. Have major psychiatric, medical or neurocognitive disorders that make participation infeasible or interfere with the adherence to the lifestyle intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Group
Lifestyle Medicine Group 1
diet, sleep, exercise and mindfulness
Experimental: Waitlist Control Group
Lifestyle Medicine Group 2
diet, sleep, exercise and mindfulness

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment

The PHQ-9, a 20-item questionnaire used for screening, diagnosing, monitoring and measuring the severity of depression, which scores each of the nine DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3" (nearly every day).

PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression respectively.

Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment

DASS-21 is a 21-items scales, comprises three sub-scales which measures the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress, over the past week. The DASS is based on a dimensional rather than a categorical conception of psychological disorder, thus it has no direct implications for the allocation of patients to discrete diagnostic categories. However, recommended cutoffs for conventional severity labels (normal, moderate, severe) are given in the DASS Manual.

Depression Anxiety Stress Normal 0-9 0-7 0-14 Mild 10-13 8-9 15-18 Moderate 14-20 10-14 19-25 Severe 21-27 15-19 26-33 Ex. Severe 28+ 20+ 34+

Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Change in Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment

ISI is a 7-item scale designed to evaluate perceived insomnia severity. Ratings on the 5-point Likert scale are obtained on the perceived severity of sleep-onset, sleep-maintenance, early morning awakening problems, satisfaction with current sleep pattern, interference with daily functioning, noticeably of impairment attributed to the sleep problem, and level of distress caused by the sleep problem.

Total score categories: 0-7 indicates no clinically significant insomnia, 8-14 refers to subthreshold insomnia,15-21 represents clinical insomnia (moderate severity), and 22-28 is clinical insomnia (severe).

Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Brief Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment

The BRS, originally developed by Smith and colleagues (2008), is a 6-item questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Higher scores represent higher level of psychological resilience. The Chinese version of the test validated by Lai & Yue (2014) has demonstrated good psychometric properties (Cronbach's alpha > .72) and were comparable to the original version developed by Smith and colleagues.

Total score divided by 6 and to be categorized: 1.00-2.99 indicates low resilience; 3.00-4.30 indicates normal resilience and 4.31-5.00 indicated high resilience.

Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Short Form (Six-Dimension) Health Survey (SF-6D)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
The SF-6D is a preference-based single index measure of health. A six-digit number represents each SF-6D health state, each digit denotes the level of one of six SF-6D dimensions: physical functioning, role limitation, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, and vitality. The SF-6D index, scores from 0.0 (worst health state) to 1.0 (best health state).
Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP II)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment

The 52-item HPLPII is composed of a total scale and six subscales to measure behaviors in the theorized dimensions of health-promoting lifestyle: spiritual growth, interpersonal relations, nutrition, physical activity, health responsibility, and stress management.

Items are scored as Never (N) = 1, Sometimes (S)= 2, Often (O) = 3, Routinely (R) = 4 A score for overall health-promoting lifestyle is obtained by calculating a mean of the individual's responses to all 52 items; six subscale scores are obtained similarly by calculating a mean of the responses to subscale items. The use of means rather than sums of scale items is recommended to retain the 1 to 4 metric of item responses and to allow meaningful comparisons of scores across subscales.

Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Change in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
SDS is a brief, 5-item self-report tool that assesses functional impairment in work/school, social life, and family life. Representation of scores in terms of functional impairment: 0: not at all, 1-3: mildly, 4-6: moderately, 7-9: markedly, 10: extremely.
Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Physical activity (Fitbit Surge Fitness Superwatch)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
The Fitbit Surge, a commercially available accelerometer-based activity tracker, is used to examine patterns of physical activity and heart rate, objectively.
Baseline, 1-week post-treatment and 12-week post treatment
Change in Credibility-Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week post-treatment
The 6-item CEQ yielded ratings of treatment credibility, acceptability/satisfaction, and expectations for success.
Baseline, 1-week post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Wellbeing

Clinical Trials on Lifestyle Medicine

3
Subscribe