PD Catheter Survival: Modified Percutaneous vs Moncrief-Popovich

March 6, 2026 updated by: Ramon Medina-Gonzalez, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara

Catheter Survival and Functionality of Peritoneal Dialysis Catheters Placed by Conventional Modified Percutaneous Technique Versus Moncrief-Popovich Technique in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement technique may affect catheter survival, functionality and infection risk. The Moncrief-Popovich (subcutaneous burying or embedding) technique was developed to reduce exit-site/tunnel infections during the interval between insertion and first use.

Objective: Compare PD catheter survival, functionality and complication rates between conventional modified percutaneous placement and Moncrief-Popovich in adults initiating planned PD.

Brief methods: Prospective, randomized, parallel-arm study enrolling adult CKD patients scheduled for planned PD initiation and catheter placement at Hospital Civil de Guadalajara between Jan 2024 and Dec 2025. Patients randomized 1:1 to conventional modified percutaneous placement group or Moncrief-Popovich buried catheter group. Primary outcome is catheter survival/functionality during follow-up. Secondary outcomes include infectious and mechanical complications, peritonitis incidence, and need to change dialysis modality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, randomized, comparative longitudinal study evaluates PD catheter survival and functionality in adult patients with advanced chronic kidney disease undergoing planned PD catheter placement at Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde" from January 2024 to December 2025. Eligible patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either the conventional modified percutaneous catheter placement (Group A) or the Moncrief-Popovich technique with subcutaneous burial of the distal catheter segment until exteriorization (Group B). Data are collected from medical records and nephrology clinic follow-up visits. Outcomes include catheter survival time, functional status at baseline and during follow-up, early and late infectious (exit-site infection, tunnel infection, peritonitis) and mechanical complications, and requirement for dialysis modality change due to catheter failure. Statistical analyses compare rates and time-to-event outcomes between groups; significance set at p < 0.05. Study procedures comply with institutional ethics oversight and informed consent requirements.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Jalisco
      • Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico, 44280
        • Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde"

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of chronic kidney disease requiring initiation of renal replacement therapy with planned peritoneal dialysis.
  • Candidate for PD catheter placement by percutaneous techniques (either conventional modified percutaneous or Moncrief-Popovich).
  • Provide informed consent and available for clinical follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent major abdominal surgery
  • Active abdominal infections at the time of catheter placement
  • Anatomical contraindications to peritoneal dialysis
  • Requiring urgent start of PD (uremic syndrome, sever hyperkalemia, severe metabolic acidosis, negligible residual renal function, severe hypervolemia or acute pulmonary edema)

Elimination Criteria:

  • Withdrawal of informed consent
  • Loss to follow-up
  • Non-catheter-related events necessitating suspension of PD that preclude further study participation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CONVENTIONAL MODIFIED PERCUTANEOUS PLACEMENT
Conventional Modified Percutaneous Placement: Description: Peritoneal dialysis catheter placed at bedside using the center's conventional modified percutaneous technique (nephrologist-performed), catheter externalized and tunneled per standard protocol; catheter used following standard healing period and center procedures.
Peritoneal dialysis catheter placed at bedside using conventional modified percutaneous technique, catheter tunneled and externalized per standard protocol; catheter used following standard healing period and center procedures performed by nephrologist.
Experimental: MONCRIEF-POPOVICH TECHNIQUE
Peritoneal dialysis catheter placed with subcutaneous burial or embedding of the external catheter segment (Moncrief-Popovich technique). Catheter remains embedded until planned exteriorization and initiation of dialysis per protocol; exteriorization performed for PD initiation.
Peritoneal dialysis catheter placement using Moncrief-Popovich Technique performed by nephrologist

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PD catheter survival and functionality
Time Frame: 12 months
Functionality assessed by ability to perform adequate PD exchanges and absence of mechanical obstruction to the end of follow-up
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peritonitis incidence
Time Frame: 12 months
Number and rate of PD-related peritonitis episodes during follow-up
12 months
Early infectious complications
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of exit-site infection or tunnel infection within 30 days after insertion
30 days
Change of dialysis modality due to catheter failure
Time Frame: 12 months
Proportion of patients requiring modality change to hemodialysis secondary to catheter-related issues
12 months
Late infectious complications
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of exit-site infection, tunnel infection beyond 30 days
12 months
Adverse events related to placement procedure
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Incidence of catheter migration, obstruction, leak, malfunction, bleeding, visceral injury, requiring intervention
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5

Clinical Trials on Modified Percutaneous PD catheter placement

Subscribe