Intrathecal Catheter Placement Versus Resiting Epidural Catheter After Dural Puncture in Obstetric Patients (ItaREVI)

Intrathecal Catheter Placement Versus Resiting Epidural Catheter After Dural Puncture in Obstetric Patients: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Epidural anesthesia represents the most popular method for pain relief during labour. Unintentional dural puncture (UDP) occurs in 0.4-1.5% of labour epidural analgesia, representing therefore the most common complication. Up to 80% of patients with a UDP may develop a post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

When a UDP occurs, two possible strategies have been proposed in order to ensure analgesia during labour: either resiting the epidural catheter in a different intervertebral space, or inserting an intrathecal catheter. Both strategies proved to equally provide analgesia during labour, but their relative contribution in preventing PDPH is still not known.

The primary aim of this multicenter randomized controlled trial is therefore to compare these two strategies in the occurrence of PDPH at 24 hours from the UDP.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

181

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of UDP during labour
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • History of PDPH

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Resiting Epidural Catheter
After a UDP has occurred, epidural catheter will be re-sited in a different intervertebral space. Analgesia will be then maintained according to internal protocol, using PIEB (Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus) system. Catheter will be left in place for the first 24-36 hours.
Active Comparator: Intrathecal catheter placement
After a UDP has occurred, an intrathecal catheter will be placed through the dural tap. Analgesia will be then maintained according to internal protocol, using PISB (Programmed Intermittent Subarachnoid Bolus) system. Catheter will be left in place for the first 24-36 hours. During this time, a continuous infusion of sterile saline at a rate of 2 mL/h will be maintained. Before removal, an additional bolus of 10 mL of sterile saline will be administered in the intrathecal catheter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PDPH incidence
Time Frame: At 24 hours from UDP
Incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) at 24 hours from UDP occurrence
At 24 hours from UDP

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PDPH intensity at 24 hours
Time Frame: At 24 hours from UDP
PDPH intensity, rated using a 10-point scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable")
At 24 hours from UDP
PDPH intensity at 48 hours
Time Frame: At 48 hours from UDP
PDPH intensity, rated using a 10-point scale, ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst pain imaginable")
At 48 hours from UDP
Quality of analgesia
Time Frame: During the entire course of labour, an average of 12 hours
Quality of analgesia during labour will be evaluated, based on the number of additional boluses of local anesthetic administered during labour to treat breakthrough pain.
During the entire course of labour, an average of 12 hours
Adverse events
Time Frame: During the entire follow-up period, up to 3 months from UDP
All reported adverse events, including number of unsuccessful attempts at placing the epidural or subarachnoid catheter, motor block, poor analgesia, caesarean section rate.
During the entire follow-up period, up to 3 months from UDP
Chronic pain at 1 month
Time Frame: At 1 month from UDP
Incidence of chronic headache and chronic low back pain
At 1 month from UDP
Chronic pain at 3 months
Time Frame: At 3 months from UDP
Incidence of chronic headache and chronic low back pain
At 3 months from UDP
Readmission to hospital
Time Frame: Up to 3 months from UDP
ER visits or hospital readmissions due to neurological symptoms related or possibly related to PDPH (severe headache, severe back pain, fever, leg weakness, incontinence of urine or stool)
Up to 3 months from UDP
Patient's satisfaction
Time Frame: Before discharge, an average of 1 week
Patient's satisfaction, evaluated through the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)
Before discharge, an average of 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 24, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post-Dural Puncture Headache

Clinical Trials on Resiting Epidural Catheter

Subscribe