A Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the PowerMe Midline Catheter in the Chinese Population

September 21, 2022 updated by: Becton, Dickinson and Company

A Prospective, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Non-inferiority Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of the PowerMe Midline Catheter Versus Traditional PIV in the Chinese Population

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the PowerMeTM Midline Catheter in the Chinese population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness and the safety of the PowerMeTM Midline Catheter compared to PIVC in the Chinese population in order to support the product's registration in China.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

256

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Changsha, China
        • Hunan Cancer Hospital
      • Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital
      • Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Shanghai First General Hospital
      • Suzhou, China
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years of age;
  2. Inpatient with a need for intravenous infusion for an expected period of more than 4 days but no more than 28 days;
  3. The veins in the upper limbs is suitable for puncture and catheterization of both the investigational device and the control device;
  4. Willing to provide written Informed Consent and complete the study per the protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Coagulation disorder or active bleeding;
  2. Skin injury, infection, or dermatosis at the site to be punctured;
  3. History of radiotherapy, thrombosis, or vascular surgery; arteriovenous fistula or phlebitis history at the area and/or vein to be catheterized;
  4. History of mental illness;
  5. End stage renal disease requires vein protection;
  6. Conditions with decreased venous flow in the extremity, such as lymphedema of the arm, etc.;
  7. Infusions of vesicant or irritant drugs, hyperosmotic infusate (the osmotic pressure >900mOsm/L in this study), parenteral nutrition, etc., which are not suitable for peripheral intravenous infusion (If other appropriate venous access is established for the aforementioned infusates, the patient may be enrolled).
  8. The evaluation of the upper limb veins is Grade II, the evaluation grade is as following:

    • 0 Veins are obviously bulged on the skin surface. The veins are touchable, thick, straight, soft, elastic and fixed.
    • I Veins are relatively full and faintly touchable. The veins are less elastic or slide easily.
    • II Veins are not full or collapsed and untouchable. The veins are hard or sliding. Phlebitis.
  9. Self-reported being pregnant or lactating;
  10. Other conditions that the investigator considers improper for the study;
  11. Participating in another study or already enrolled.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Powerme midline catheter
catheter placement
Sham Comparator: peripheral intravenous catheter
BD Pegusas peripheral intravenous catheter
catheter placement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptance of the overall performance of the IV catheter system
Time Frame: up to 28 days

After the placement of the IV catheter system, the study nurse shall answer "yes/no" to the following questions:

  1. Can the IV catheter system vent the air properly;
  2. Can the IV catheter system be inserted and be placed in the blood vessel;
  3. Can the needle tube be withdrawn from the septum;

    After the removal of the IV catheter system, the study nurse shall answer "yes/no" to the following questions:

  4. Can the IV catheter system be removed properly;
  5. There is no leakage during the application of the IV catheter system (including the processes of venting, infusion, flushing and sealing, and indwelling).
up to 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success rate of the first insertion of the catheter
Time Frame: First day, during catheter insertion
Successful first insertion means the IV catheter system can be successfully inserted into the blood vessel on the first insertion.
First day, during catheter insertion
Indwelling time
Time Frame: up to 28 days
The retention time of the IV catheter system of each subject after successful insertion.
up to 28 days
Rate of good performance of the pinch clamp
Time Frame: up to 28 days
If the pinch clamp can close and open the tubing properly, performance of the pinch clamp can be evaluated as "good".
up to 28 days
Incidence of catheter blockage
Time Frame: up to 28 days
The catheter system is blocked, causing the system to fail to infuse the fluid after it is connected to the infusion set/syringe.
up to 28 days
Incidence of accidental dislodgement
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Unintentional premature removal of the catheter from the vessel.
up to 28 days
Incidence of phlebitis
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Incidence of phlebitis
up to 28 days
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Incidence of adverse events
up to 28 days
Incidence of serious adverse events
Time Frame: up to 28 days
Incidence of serious adverse events
up to 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xuying Li, RN, Hunan Cancer Hospital, China

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CDC-19POWME01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Catheterization

Clinical Trials on catheter placement

3
Subscribe