- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07469384
Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Using Tdcs of the Third (of Many) Visual Pathways (ButtomVP)
Sensory Contributions to Third Visual Pathway Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: Correlation and Causation
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The studey involves a randomized, parallel group comparison of personalized, MR-guided, cathodal HD-tDCS vs. sham targeting the middle temporal motion-sensitive region (HCP MMP1.0-atlas area MT+ complex) for the reversal of physiological impairments in Sz related to motion processing and social cognitive dysfunction. RDoC constructs to be tested include face emotion recognition (FER) and Understanding Mental State (UMS), which has also been termed Theory of Mind (ToM) or mentalizing. The overall goals of the study are to determine whether tDCS applied over MT+ can ameliorate 1) motion-processing deficits in Sz and 2) deficits in activation of other TVP regions. Key outcome measures include 1) activation of MT+, pSTS and mSTS regions to motion and dynamic FER stimuli and 2) fractional occupancy (FO) of the CAP state corresponding to the TVP structure. Behavioral outcomes will include scores on motion discrimination, FER to dynamic faces, and TASIT sarcasm (UMS).
Participants will include 120 individuals with Sz and 30 healthy controls (HC). Sz individuals will be evaluated both cross-sectionally and during blinded, randomized active (cathodal) or sham pHD-tDCS targeted to MTC. HC will be evaluated cross-sectionally only. All participants will first undergo baseline assessment (Visit 1) and baseline physiological assessments (Visit 2). Each Sz participant will then be assigned to blinded intervention with either active or sham tDCS and will participate in one ERP (Visit 3) and one fMRI session (Visit 4) involving up to 40-min stimulation each. The two tDCS sessions will be conducted at least 1 week apart and may occur in either order. For each participant, the same randomized treatment (active vs. sham tDCS) will be used in both the ERP and fMRI sessions (Visits 3 and 4). Behavior is obtained during the ERP session (Visit 3). Comparisons will focus on correlations among the fMRI, ERP and behavioral outcome measures within participants as well as the effects of active vs. sham tDCS across participants.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Odeta Beggel, MA
- Phone Number: 845-398-2897
- Email: odeta.beggel@nki.rfmh.org
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Orangeburg, New York, United States, 10962
- Recruiting
- Nathan Kline Institute
-
Contact:
- Odeta Beggel, MA
- Phone Number: 845-398-2897
- Email: odeta.beggel@nki.rfmh.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Daniel C Javitt, MD, PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Antigona Martinez, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female subject, age 18-55
- Competent and willing to sign informed consent
- No more than moderately ill
- SCID DSM-5 diagnosis of Sz/SzAff
- WAIS IQ >70
- Does not meet current criteria for DSM-5 defined substance abuse or dependence or have a history of diagnosis within past 6 months
- On medication within clinically approved range
- Does not meet criteria for another DSM-5 disorder other than those judged to be minor (e.g. simple phobia)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Significant neurological illness or history of significant head trauma
- Unstable physical illness or significant auditory/visual deficits that might interfer
- Contraindication to MRI (e.g. metal implants, claustrophobia, pregnancy)
- Contraindications to tDCS including metal implant, pacemaker, history of seizure, traumatic brain injury or stroke
- Significant risk for suicide
- Has a history of an illness, disease, condition injury, or disability which, in the opinion of the principal investigator, may interfere with the completion of all study requirements per protocol, impact the quality of the data, or the validity of the study results, including unstable physical illness, significant neurological illness, significant head trauma
- Moderate or greater DSM-5 current substance use disorder, defined based on the presence of 4 or more of 11 substance use criteria within the past 12 months. In addition, individuals for whom substance use leads to not being able to perform work, home or school activities
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active tDCS
Personalized, high-definition tDCS applied to area MT+
|
tDCS will be applied over cortical region MT+
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham tDCS
Sham tDCS applied over area MT+, using ramp up/ramp down to simulate active treatment
|
Ramp up/ramp down to simulate scalp sensation associated with tDCS.
No sustained current flow
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MT+ activation as determined using fMRI
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 10
|
Magnitude of activation in area MT+ during random dot kinematogram (RDK) stimulation measured by the beta weight of the BOLD fMRI signal, expressed in units of percentage signal change
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 10
|
|
MT+ activation as determined using event-related potentials (ERP)
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
Amplitude of the ERP response to random dot kinematogram (RDK) stimulation, measured in microvolts
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Activation of the third visual pathway (regions pSTS/mSTS) during a dynamic face emotion recognition (FER) task, as measured using fMRI
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 10
|
Magnitude of activation in areas pSTS and mSTS during the dynamic FER task as measured by the beta weight of the BOLD fMRI signal, expressed in units of percentage signal change
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 10
|
|
Fractional occupancy (FO) of the TVP CAP state
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 10
|
Fractional occupancy of the TVP CAP state during the NV-fMRI stimuli (Despicable me, Sherlock), as measured in percentage units
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 10
|
|
Activation of the third visual pathway (regions pSTS/mSTS) during a dynamic face emotion recognition (FER) task, as measured using ERP
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
Amplitude of the ERP response to dynamic emotional face stimuli, measured in microvolts
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
|
Motion discrimination threshold
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
% motion of the random dot kinetamatogram (RDK) stimuli needed for detection of motion, measured in percent
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
|
Face emotion recognition (FER) accuracy
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
% correct responses on the dynamic face emotion recognition task, measured as percent correct
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
|
Understanding mental states (UMS) accuracy
Time Frame: Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
Percentage correct performance on the TASIT sarcasm task, measured as percent correct
|
Simultaneously with the administration of the active or sham tDCS intervention during study day 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel C Javitt, MD, PhD, Nathan Kline Institute
- Principal Investigator: Antigona Martinez, PhD, Nathan Kline Institute
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NKI2025-28
- R01MH138939 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Schizo Affective Disorder
-
PfizerCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizo-affective DisorderSouth Africa
-
Braeburn PharmaceuticalsCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizo-affective DisorderUnited States
-
Technical University of MunichCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizo-affective Disorder
-
Duke UniversityTerminatedSchizophrenia | Schizo-affective Disorder
-
University of KonstanzCenter for Psychiatry, Reichenau, Germany; Thurgau Psychiatric Services, SwitzerlandCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizo-affective DisorderGermany
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentIndiana University; Dartmouth CollegeCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizo-affective DisorderUnited States
-
Mclean HospitalNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedBipolar Disorder | Schizo-affective DisorderUnited States
-
Shalvata Mental Health CenterCompletedSchizophrenia | Schizo-Affective DisorderIsrael
-
University Hospital, LilleTerminatedPatient Treated With Lithium, With Bipolar or Schizo-affective Disorder, Hospitalized in a Psychiatric WardFrance
-
The Royal Ottawa Mental Health CentreFonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec; The Royal's Institute of Mental Health...RecruitingPsychotic Disorders | Schizophrenia | Schizo Affective DisorderCanada
Clinical Trials on transcranial direct current stimulation
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruitingStroke | Brain Connectivity | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | Motor Learning | Adaptation | Brain Structure | AnkleTaiwan
-
Medical University of South CarolinaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Withdrawn
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompleted
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)CompletedStroke | Nonfluent AphasiaUnited States
-
University of Campinas, BrazilUnknownEpilepsy IntractableBrazil
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyActive, not recruitingSpinal Cord Diseases | Spinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
Dina Hatem ElhammadyUnknown
-
Beijing Sport UniversityNot yet recruitingTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
-
Federal University of ParaíbaUnknown
-
WANG KAICompletedChronic Insomnia | Transcranial Direct Current StimulationChina