Efficacy and Safety of 20% and 100% Autologous Serum Eye Drops in Patients With Severe Dry Eye Disease (AST) (AST)

March 9, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Efficacy and Safety of 20% and 100% Autologous Serum Eye Drops in Patients With Severe Dry Eye Disease: a Prospective, Blinded, Randomized, Crossover Study

A prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled crossover trial was conducted in patients with severe dry eye syndrome. Topical treatment with autologous serum eye drops (ASED) diluted at 20%, undiluted ASED and conventional preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) were compared as a treatment for severe dry eye disease. The primary outcome measure was assessment of ocular symptoms using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were Schirmer 1 test, best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), corneal fluorescein and conjunctival lissamine green staining using the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Ocular Surface Staining (SICCA OSS) score, tear break up time (TBUT), conjunctival injection score (CIS) and Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) grading. Additionally, serum and tear cytokine analysis and microbiological cultures were performed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective, single-blinded, randomized, crossover clinical trial analyzed the difference in subjective symptoms and clinical signs between 20% and 100% autologous serum eye drops (ASED) versus preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT). After signing the informed consent form, each patient was randomized via RedCap. A 2-week washout was initiated prior to the baseline visit and the start of the first treatment. Patients were asked to discontinue current PFAT and/or ASED and replace them with the washout, in the form of preservative-free 3% trehalose and 0.15% hyaluronic acid (HA)-containing artificial tears. Concurrent use of necessary ocular anti-inflammatory therapy (cyclosporine, hydrocortisone) and moisturizing ocular ointment at night was allowed, provided it was maintained throughout the entire crossover study. Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The same preservative-free artificial tears containing 3% trehalose and 0.15% hyaluronic acid (HA) were used during the PFAT treatment as during the washout. The total study duration was 30 weeks (Figure 1). The examining ophthalmologist (DR) was blinded to the type of eyedrops given to each patient in the trial. The minimum dosage for the eye drops (AS and PFAT) was eight times a day. If necessary, hourly application was allowed. In that case, the patient was asked to continue hourly application for all three treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oost-Vlaanderen
      • Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The inclusion criteria for patients participating in this study are defined as follows: patients with severe Dry Eye Disease, including severe symptoms as evaluated with a standardized instrument (OSDI score > 33), associated with at least one of the following objective parameters:

A. Tear break-up time (tBUT) as a measure of tear film quality < 5 seconds B. Positive corneal and conjunctival staining quantified according to the SICCA OSS scale C. Schirmer 1 test score < 5 mm/5 min (without anesthesia)

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria for patients participating in this study are defined as follows:

A. Inability to complete the study protocol, including study-specific procedures.

B. Inability to understand the Dutch-language ICF and/or unwillingness or inability to provide signed informed consent.

C. History of non-compliance with the proposed therapy D. Presence of known severe anemia based on medical history E. Hypersensitivity to the proposed treatment F. Pregnancy G. Age <18 years H. In the opinion of the investigator, the subject is not suitable for participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequence 1: T1-T2-T3
After a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • PFAT
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 20%
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 100%
Experimental: Sequence 2: T1-T3-T2
After a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • PFAT
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 20%
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 100%
Experimental: Sequence 3: T2-T3-T1
After a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • PFAT
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 20%
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 100%
Experimental: Sequence 4: T2-T1-T3
After a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • PFAT
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 20%
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 100%
Experimental: Sequence 5: T3-T1-T2
After a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • PFAT
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 20%
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 100%
Experimental: Sequence 6: T3-T2-T1
After a washout of 2 weeks, study participants in this arm first received 8 weeks of autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 100% (T3). After 8 weeks of treatment, the first treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The second treatment is this arm was autologous serum eye drops (ASED) at a concentration of 20% (T2). After 8 weeks of treatment, the second treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. Patients were then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment. The third treatment is this arm was preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) (T1). After 8 weeks of treatment, the third treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit.
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • PFAT
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 20%
Each patient received three 8-week treatments in a randomized sequence, being PFAT, AS 20% and AS 100%. After 8 weeks of treatment, the treatment effect was evaluated during a scheduled study visit. The patient was then instructed to start a new washout of 2 weeks to immediately follow with the next treatment.
Other Names:
  • ASED 100%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in participant-reported severity and/or frequency of dry eye-related symptoms based on a validated patient symptom questionnaire (Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire, OSDI)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
OSDI
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in ocular staining with fluorescein and lissamine green according to the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance Ocular Staining Score (SICCA OSS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
SICCA OSS
8 weeks
Change from baseline in Schirmer 1 tear production test (mm)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Schirmer 1 test
8 weeks
Change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, Snellen)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
BCVA
8 weeks
Change from baseline in tear film break-up time at the slit lamp (tBUT, sec)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
tBUT
8 weeks
Change from baseline in non-invasive break-up-time (NiBUT) using anterior segment ocular coherence tomography (OCT) (sec)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
NiBUT
8 weeks
Change from baseline in conjunctival injection score (CIS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
CIS
8 weeks
Change from baseline in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) grade
Time Frame: 8 weeks
MGD
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dimitri Roels, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Ghent University Hospital Belgium

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Disease

Clinical Trials on Preservative-free artificial tears

Subscribe