- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07483164
A Study Of T1/Tref Intubating Conditions
May 18, 2026 updated by: J. Ross Renew, M.D., Mayo Clinic
Intubating Conditions Based On The Ratio Between The Twitch Amplitude And Reference Twitch Amplitude: A Randomized, Prospective, Clinical Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine the maximum ratio of the twitch amplitude (T1) to the reference twitch (Tref) amplitude (T1/Tref) that provides excellent intubating conditions.
Study Overview
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
108
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
- Mayo Clinic in Florida
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > or = 18 years old
- Patients willing to participate and provide an integrated, informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with disorders, such as stroke, carpal tunnel syndrome, broken wrist with nerve damage, Dupuytren contracture, or any similar wrist injury.
- Patients with systemic neuromuscular diseases such as myasthenia gravis.
- Patients with significant organ dysfunction that can significantly affect pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular blocking and reversal agents, i.e., severe renal impairment requiring dialysis or end-stage liver disease.
- Patients requiring a rapid sequence induction for airway protection.
- Patients deemed ineligible for surgery, including pregnancy (as determined by standard of care testing).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: T1/Tref <0.1
Participants will be intubated once the ratio of the twitch amplitude to the reference twitch amplitude (T1/Tref) <0.1 (deeper level of block)
|
(T1/Tref) <0.1
|
|
Experimental: T1/Tref <0.3
Participants will be intubated once the ratio of the twitch amplitude to the reference twitch amplitude T1/Tref <0.3 (intermediate depth of block)
|
(T1/Tref) <0.3
|
|
Experimental: T1/Tref <0.5
Participants will be intubated once the ratio of the twitch amplitude to the reference twitch amplitude T1/Tref <0.5 (shallower level of block)
|
(T1/Tref) <0.5
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Maximum T1/Tref ratio associated with excellent intubating conditions
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The T1/Tref ratio that leads to the highest proportion of patients being intubated under excellent conditions: T1/Tref <0.1, T1/Tref <0.3, or T1/Tref <0.5
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to reach specific neuromuscular block level from rocuronium administration to achieving T1/Tref <0.1
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Time to reach specific neuromuscular block level from rocuronium administration to achieving T1/Tref <0.1 will be reported in seconds
|
Baseline
|
|
Time to reach specific neuromuscular block level from rocuronium administration to achieving T1/Tref <0.3
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Time to reach specific neuromuscular block level from rocuronium administration to achieving T1/Tref <0.3 will be reported in seconds
|
Baseline
|
|
Time to reach specific neuromuscular block level from rocuronium administration to achieving T1/Tref <0.5
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Time to reach specific neuromuscular block level from rocuronium administration to achieving T1/Tref <0.5 will be reported in seconds
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.1
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.1 arm, considered to have excellent intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with good intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.1
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.1 arm considered to have good intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with poor intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.1
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.1 arm, considered to have poor intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.3
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.3 arm, considered to have excellent intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with good intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.3
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.3 arm, considered to have good intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with poor intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.3
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.3 arm, considered to have poor intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with excellent intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.5
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.5 arm, considered to have excellent intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with good intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.5
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.5 arm, considered to have good intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
|
Proportion of patients with poor intubating conditions at predefined T1/Tred threshold: <0.5
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Percentage of patients, out of total patients in the T1/Tref <0.5 arm, considered to have poor intubation conditions (using Copenhagen Consensus Conference Intubation Score)
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: J. Ross Renew, MD, Mayo Clinic
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 16, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 19, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 19, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 18, 2026
Last Verified
May 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 25-014117
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Intubation
-
National Cheng-Kung University HospitalNot yet recruitingIntubation; Complication | Intubation Intraesophageal | Intubation Depth | Intubation, Nasogastric | Intubation Times
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalRecruitingIntubation | Intubation, Endotracheal | Intubation Complications | Rapid Sequence Induction and Intubation | Delayed Sequence IntubationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Spanish Network for Research in Infectious DiseasesCompletedIntubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedSpain
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandSociété Française d'Anesthésie-Réanimation (SFAR)CompletedEndotracheal Intubation | Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult or FailedFrance
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)RecruitingIntubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore, Australia, Austria, India, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedIntubation, Nasotracheal IntubationTaiwan
-
Emory UniversityTerminatedAirway Morbidity | Intubation Complication | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Tracheal Intubation Morbidity | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States
-
Catharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenCompletedAnesthesia Intubation Complication | Intubation; Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation | Failed or Difficult Intubation, Initial EncounterNetherlands
-
NHS LothianMedtronicNot yet recruitingIntubation Complications | Intubation Skill | Intubation With Uncuffed Endotracheal TubeUnited Kingdom
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedIntubation Complication | Intubation;Difficult | Failed or Difficult Intubation, SequelaUnited States, Canada, Singapore
Clinical Trials on Twitch amplitude <0.1
-
University of WashingtonRecruiting
-
Yonsei UniversityUnknownDisease Status of Pancreatobiliary Tract , ( Especially Who Need to Undergo Pancreaticoduodenectomy)Korea, Republic of
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreThe Physicians' Services Incorporated FoundationUnknownFemoral Nerve DiseaseCanada
-
Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory DiseaseCompleted
-
Biruni UniversityCompleted
-
University of AarhusCompleted
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedDiaphragmatic DysfunctionFrance
-
Fenerbahce UniversityRecruitingAging | Balance Disorders | Risk of Falling in the ElderlyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Genevieve Du Pont-ThibodeauUnknownTraumatic Brain InjuryCanada