- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07485725
Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement - CREATE V - Project 3
Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement - CREATE V
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Deployment of technology in healthcare and day-to- day activities is increasing and advances in technology such as artificial intelligence (AI) are increasingly aimed at supporting older adults. Yet, aging adults are often ignored in design, and robust research evaluating the usability, safety, and efficacy of these systems with older adults is limited. Even among older technology adopters, rapid changes in technology pose challenges in terms of the constant need for adaptation and continual learning. Further, there remains a lag in uptake among many older adult sub-groups, including ethnic minorities, older cohorts, those of lower socio-economic status, those living in a rural location, or with a cognitive impairment such as Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or Alzheimer's Disease/Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (AD/ADRD). The goal of CREATE V is to harness the potential benefits and power of technology to maintain, support, and foster the cognitive, emotional, and physical health of aging adults to enhance independence, well-being, and quality of life. Given that age represents a significant risk factor for cognitive impairments such as MCI and AD/ADRD, and the criticality of cognition to everyday functioning, a thrust of the research investigators planned research is on using emerging technologies to help maintain cognitive health and provide support for those with cognitive impairments. CREATE V has a fresh vision, a focus on emerging technologies, expanded research teams, new populations such as those with cognitive impairments, and technological capabilities.
Project 3: Phase 1 will use a multimethod approach across the three study sites to assess the demands and challenges facing diverse older adults in the performance of the three health- management activities. Techniques include structured focus groups of subject matter experts, cognitive task analysis of existing tools, and process tracing of older adults' task performance.
In Phase 2, investigators will use the knowledge derived from Phase 1, together with an understanding of older adults' cognitive capabilities and limitations, and their needs and preferences, to conduct iterative design of the digital assistant tools and evaluate their effectiveness and perceived usability using older adults with and without cognitive impairments and diverse in technology skills.
In Phase 3, investigators will do a comparative assessment of the digital assistant tools for the three health-management activities (4 problems in each domain) by randomizing a cross-site sample of 240 participants, with and without MCI, varying in age, ethnicity/race, SES, and technology experience, to novel tool and control conditions, assessing efficacy and usability of the novel tools. The project will yield important information on how best to design technology aids to provide cognitive support for health decision making.
Project 3 record was originally listed under NCT05811338.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Chelsie Burchett, PhD
- Phone Number: 646-962-7141
- Email: cob2014@med.cornell.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Xin Lin, PhD
- Phone Number: 646-962-7141
- Email: xyl4001@med.cornell.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32306
- Florida State University
-
-
Illinois
-
Champaign, Illinois, United States, 61820
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
-
Contact:
- Wendy Rogers, PhD
- Phone Number: 217-300-1470
- Email: wendyr@illinois.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Wendy Rogers, PhD
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- Weill Cornell Medicine
-
Contact:
- Chelsie Burchett, MA
- Phone Number: 646-962-7141
- Email: cob2014@med.cornell.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Sara Czaja, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Project 1:
- 65+ years of age
- Able to read English at the 6th grade level
- Have 20/60 vision with or without correction.
Project 2:
- 62+ years of age
- Able to read English at the 6th grade level
- Have 20/60 vision with or without correction.
- Clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
- Subjective cognitive complaints
- Evidence by clinical evaluation
- Clinical Dementia Rating Global scale of 0.5-2.0
- Probable MCI
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 18-26
- No major Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) impairments
- Geriatric Depression Scale of 4 or Below
- No diagnosis of dementia
Project 3:
- 60+ years of age
- Able to read English at the 6th grade level
- Have 20/60 vision with or without correction.
- MoCA score of 23 or lower
Exclusion Criteria:
All Projects:
- Blind or have visual impairments that limit their ability to view the technology.
- Deaf or have hearing impairments that limit their ability to answer telephone queries.
- Have a life-limiting/terminal illness
- Severe motor impairment (e.g., severe tremors or debilitating arthritis in their hands) that impairs ability to speak or use dominant hand
Project 1:
- Chronic neck pain/injury that might make the headset uncomfortable
Project 2:
- Cognitive impairment (MOCA ≤ 25)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Project 3 - Phase 1: Problem Space Specification and Task Selection
Both the subject matter experts and older adult participants will participate in individual structured interviews for each activity category, 1.5 - 2 hours in length.
This qualitative data will provide rich contextualized information regarding the specific needs of older adults for access to services, financial health management, and Medicare.gov
services utilization.
This data will be used to identify current barriers and facilitators to successful healthcare management that could be targeted by technology solutions and/obtain details of the challenges that are common in each activity category.
|
|
|
No Intervention: Project 3 - Phase 2: Development of Digital Assistant Tools
The study includes one session that will last approximately 2 - 3 hours.
The study involves interactions with digital assistants developed by the research team, the participants will answer structured interview questions regarding their experiences using the system.
The researchers will assess the participants' comments along dimensions such as type of information requested, preference for format of information, points of confusion, and likes and dislikes of features, which will form the basis for a prioritized list of features/functions to be modified for the next prototype iteration.
|
|
|
Experimental: Project 3 - Phase 3: DATA Condition
Participants in the DATA condition, instead of access to a generic digital assistant, will have DATA at their disposal to solve the queries and will be encouraged to use it as the primary resource.
Qualitative data on how they use this tool, in isolation and in conjunction with other sources of information, will be collected.
Following completion of the problems, as in Phase 2, measures of DATA usability will be collected including usefulness and comprehension associated with each tool, perceived mental workload, and usability with an efficient, two-item test based on the widely used System Usability Scale: UMUX-LITE).
The investigators will then conduct an audio-recorded semi-structured exit interview about various perceptions participants had regarding the challenges associated with successfully solving the health-management problems.
|
An innovative intelligent decision tool for health decisions aims at providing health management support for older adults with and without MCI.
|
|
Active Comparator: Project 3 - Phase 3: Usual-Tool Control Condition
Participants will have access to a generic, non-adapted voice assistant available on a provided tablet.
The experimenter will use a standard script that allows for guidance to participants in searching for information relevant to the problems.
Participants will indicate when they are ready to move on to the next problem, which will be followed by their assessment of the confidence they have in having solved the problem, their comprehension of the information associated with the problem, their assessment of the usefulness of the available information, and the perceived mental workload they experienced in solving the problem.
Investigators will track, code, and analyze participants' online interactions with any websites they use.
For each of the three task activity domains, overall performance scores will be computed, as will performance scores for the simpler and more complex problems.
|
An innovative intelligent decision tool for health decisions aims at providing health management support for older adults with and without MCI.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Project 3, Phase 1: Qualitative interview assessment regarding Healthcare Challenges
Time Frame: During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
Analysis of interview transcripts will identify common themes that will be the target of technology-based support.
The general script for interviews with older adults will start with a) demographics and medical history; (b) health management strategies - current approaches for monitoring and managing chronic conditions and maintaining general wellness; (c) current use, awareness of, openness to, and concerns about technologies for health management; (d) general challenges experienced and barriers to successful health management.
Investigators will then have sections of the interview script tailored to the three activity categories: access to services; financial health management, and Medicare utilization.
|
During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
|
Project 3, Phase 3: Mixed-method assessment of usability challenges assessed using the Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX-LITE)
Time Frame: During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
User testing will have participants "think aloud" as they solve healthcare problems, and data will be coded for frustration and specific challenges experienced.
The investigators will also use classic usability measures, for example, UMUX-LITE.
The Usability Metric for User Experience (UMUX-Lite) is a two-item Likert scale used for the subjective assessment of an application's perceived usability.
On a 7 point scale, with 0 being strongly disagree and 6 being strongly agree, higher scores are reflective of a greater satisfaction with the system.
|
During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
|
Project 3, Phase 3: Comprehension and Decision Making Accuracy
Time Frame: During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
For hypothetical healthcare challenges participants will be presented with, they will afterward be tested on their comprehension of important terms, and their decision-making accuracy will be evaluated, for participants with and without access to novel technology tools developed as part of this project.
The comprehension and decision making accuracy measure is to be developed based on projects 1 and 2 of the study.
|
During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Project 3, Phase 3: Comprehension and Decision Making Tool Usability
Time Frame: During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
The Comprehension and Decision making tool will measure participants' perception of technology-based intervention ease of use and usefulness.
The Comprehension and Decision making tool measure is to be developed based on projects 1 and 2 of the study.
|
During one-time condition session at Baseline Assessment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sara J Czaja, PhD, Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 23-01025559-03
- P01AG073090-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiAnkara UniversityRecruitingAmnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment | Amnestic Mild Cognitive DisorderTurkey
-
Masaryk UniversityRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Amnestic | Lewy Body Disease With Mild Cognitive Impairment | Parkinson's Disease With Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCzechia
-
BaycrestCentre for Aging and Brain Health InnovationUnknownNeurocognitive Disorders | Cognitive Dysfunction | Mental Disorder | Cognitive Impairment, Mild | Cognitive Disorder | Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentCanada
-
High Point UniversityWake Forest University Health Sciences; Hebrew SeniorLifeRecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)United States
-
Azienda Ospedaliera SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare...Dr. Schär AG / SPARecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Italy
-
Xuanwu Hospital, BeijingWuhan University; Beijing Friendship Hospital; First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentChina
-
Immunotec Inc.RecruitingMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Canada
-
Çankırı Karatekin UniversityCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
University of AlbertaCompleted
-
Friedhelm HummelThe Novartis Foundation; Wyss Center for Bio and Neuroengineering; Clinique Romande... and other collaboratorsCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)Switzerland
Clinical Trials on Project 3, Phase 3: Intelligent Decision Support Tool
-
University of California, San FranciscoFogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health; Africa Interdisciplinary...Enrolling by invitationPregnancy | HIV | Mental Health | Postpartum | Stigma, Social | HIV - Human Immunodeficiency Virus | Stigma | Mental Health (Depression) | Depression - Major Depressive Disorder | Pyschological DistressGhana
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUMC UtrechtCompleted
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedFollicular Lymphoma | Myeloid Leukemia | Polycythemia Vera | Hodgkin Lymphoma | Myelofibrosis | Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia | Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia | Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia | Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma | Myelodysplastic Syndrome | Plasma Cell Myeloma | Refractory... and other conditionsUnited States