- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07502612
Evaluation of Medication Tapering on the Sensitivity of the Spinal Cord Using Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation (Pilot Study) (ECAP-MED Pilot)
Neurophysiological Effects of Pain Medication Reduction During Treatment With Closed-Loop Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Pilot Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a single-centre, open-label, prospective pilot study in Belgium. Twenty patients scheduled for SCS with the Evoke ECAP-controlled closed-loop system will be enrolled. Eligible patients must use at least one qualifying pain medication at a minimum daily dose (gabapentin ≥150 mg, pregabalin ≥75 mg, morphine ≥40 mg, hydromorphone ≥10 mg, oxycodone ≥20 mg, fentanyl ≥25 µg).
The study includes baseline assessments, a 3-week trial period, permanent implantation if successful, and follow-up visits at 1, 3, and 6 months. Data collected include VAS pain, sleep, activity, medication use, and neurophysiological parameters (activation plots, conduction velocity, chronaxie, rheobase).
The primary endpoint is the effect of medication reduction on spinal cord sensitivity to SCS. Secondary endpoints include changes in pain intensity, medication use, sleep, activity, and additional neurophysiological outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Pieter Van Looy
- Phone Number: +32 3 443 48 72
- Email: pieter.vanlooy@zas.be
Study Locations
-
-
-
Wilrijk, Belgium, 2610
- Recruiting
- Brai²n - ZAS Augustinus
-
Contact:
- Pieter Van Looy
- Phone Number: +32 3 443 48 72
- Email: pieter.vanlooy@zas.be
-
Principal Investigator:
- Tony Van Havenbergh, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Candidate for SCS and scheduled for trial with Evoke system.
- Diagnosis of FBSS or FNSS (PSPS-T2).
- Current use of ≥1 qualifying pain medication at or above minimum daily dose:
- Gabapentin ≥150 mg
- Pregabalin ≥75 mg
- Morphine ≥40 mg
- Hydromorphone ≥10 mg
- Oxycodone ≥20 mg
- Fentanyl ≥25 µg
- Signed informed consent.
- Age ≥18 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active disruptive psychiatric disorder or condition impacting pain perception or compliance.
- Progressive neurological disease (MS, CIDP, progressive arachnoiditis, progressive diabetic neuropathy, brain/spinal tumor, severe spinal stenosis).
- Coagulation disorder, platelet dysfunction, progressive vascular disease, or uncontrolled diabetes with procedural risk.
- Active systemic or local infection.
- Pregnancy.
- Significant untreated addiction or substance abuse (within 6 months prior)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Patients with FBSS, taking at least qualifying opioids
Patients with FBSS, taking at least one qualifying pain medication at or above the minimum daily dose.
|
All patients undergo a 21-day trial with Evoke closed-loop SCS.
If successful, patients receive a permanent implant.
Assessments include activation plots, conduction velocity, chronaxie, rheobase, VAS pain, sleep, activity, and medication intake.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal cord sensitivity expressed in ECAP amplitude (µV) as a function of the SCS stimulation amplitude (mA).
Time Frame: From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
Spinal cord sensitivity to spinal cord stimulation (SCS), will be assessed using activation plots describing the relationship between SCS stimulation current (mA) and the resultant Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) amplitude (µV).
Change is spinal cord sensitivity (µV/mA) will be compared between the SCS trial phase and at 1 month after permanent implantation across the different medication groups.
|
From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in pain intensity measured using a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
Participants will be required report their pain intensity using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 refers to no pain at all and 10 refers to worst possible pain.
The resultant VAS score, expressed in cm, will be compared across study visits.
|
From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
|
Change in pain medication intake measured via Belgian Pain Platform (BPP) and clinical verification
Time Frame: From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
Reduction in analgesic medication dose (standardized daily dose or milligram equivalents, if applicable) will be documented using daily/weekly BPP entries and verified by clinical staff.
Data will be compared between baseline, end of SCS trial, and 1 month after permanent implantation.
|
From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
|
Change in neurophysiological parameters such as conduction velocity (m/sec), rheobase (mA) and chronaxie (µs), measured using the Evoke system's neurophysiological assessment tools.
Time Frame: From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
The following neurophysiological parameters will be measured using the Evoke system's neurophysiological assessment tools.
|
From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation.
|
|
Changes in sleep and activity scores
Time Frame: From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation
|
Participants will be required report their sleep and activity scores using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS) where 0 refers to no sleep and no activity at all and 10 refers to sleeping very well through the night and being very active.
The resultant VAS score, expressed in cm, will be compared across study visits.
|
From start of SCS trial (baseline) to 6 month after permanent implantation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tony Van Havenbergh, MD, PhD, Brai²n / Department of Neurosurgery, ZAS Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GZA-ECAP-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Spinal Cord Stimulation
-
Brai²nRecruitingPersistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), Lower Spine | Spinal Cord Sensitivity to Neurostimulation | Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Spinal Cord StimulationBelgium
-
Lian-Cing Yan, MSPTNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord Injury | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Spinal Cord Injury/Damage | Spinal Cord Injury Thoracic | Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) | Spinal Cord Injury T1-L2 | Epidural Electrical StimulationTaiwan
-
Case Western Reserve UniversityCompletedSpinal Cord Stimulation | High-frequency Stimulation | High-density StimulationUnited States
-
Spine Care, OklahomaCompletedSpinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos de ToledoUnknownSpinal Cord Stimulation | Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation | Dose-response RelationshipSpain
-
Francis FarhadiRecruitingCervical Myelopathy | Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury | Electric Stimulation Therapy | Spinal Cord StimulationUnited States
-
Jocelyne BlochEcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneRecruitingDeep Brain Stimulation | Neuro: Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinTerminatedSpinal Cord Compression Due to Metastasis to SpineGermany
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinCompletedSpinal Cord Compression Due to Metastasis to SpineGermany
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildCompletedSpinal Cord StimulationFrance
Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Stimulation with Evoke Closed-Loop System
-
Brai²nRecruitingPersistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), Lower Spine | Spinal Cord Sensitivity to Neurostimulation | Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Spinal Cord StimulationBelgium
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySaluda Medical Pty LtdWithdrawnChronic Pain | Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke | Upper Motor Neuron LesionUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingChronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Saluda Medical Americas, Inc.CompletedPain | Back Pain | Chronic PainUnited States
-
MedtronicNeuroCompleted
-
Saint Francis HospitalSaluda Medical Americas, Inc.Active, not recruitingPain | Chronic Pain | Neuropathic PainUnited States
-
Saluda Medical Pty LtdCompletedPain | Back Pain | Chronic PainUnited States
-
Saluda Medical Pty LtdRecruitingChronic PainAustralia
-
Saluda Medical Pty LtdActive, not recruiting