Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Human Observation Medtronic Algorithm Comparison Study (ECHO-MAC)

February 23, 2024 updated by: MedtronicNeuro

Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Human Observation Medtronic Algorithm Comparison Study (ECHO-MAC)

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind, cross-over, non-significant risk IDE research study to evaluate the in-clinic performance of a closed-loop algorithm in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) therapy with an ENS device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical trial information was submitted voluntarily under the applicable law and, therefore, certain submission deadlines may not apply. (That is, clinical trial information for this non-applicable clinical trial was submitted under section 402(j)(4)(A) of the Public Health Service Act and 42 CFR 11.60 and is not subject to the deadlines established by sections 402(j)(2) and (3) of the Public Health Service Act or 42 CFR 11.24 and 11.44.)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Carlsbad, California, United States, 92009
        • Coastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics
    • Minnesota
      • Duluth, Minnesota, United States, 55805
        • Lakewalk Surgery Center
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55439
        • Twin Cities Pain Clinic
      • Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
        • Nura Research Institute
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
        • The Ohio State University
      • Kettering, Ohio, United States, 45429
        • Kettering Medical Center
      • Mount Orab, Ohio, United States, 45154
        • Premier Pain Treatment Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17601
        • Center for Interventional Pain and Spine
    • South Dakota
      • Watertown, South Dakota, United States, 57201
        • Innovative Pain Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 22 years of age or older
  • Candidate for or undergoing Medtronic SCS device trial for labeled indication - Candidate for or undergoing a Medtronic SCS device trial for labeled indication means that a clinical decision has already been made between a physician and the patient to undergo Medtronic SCS trialing to treat the patient's chronic pain. This decision is to be made prior to discussing with the patient whether to enroll in the study
  • Willing and able to provide signed and dated informed consent
  • Capable of comprehending and consenting in English
  • Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and visits
  • Clear, measurable ECAP ECAPs - If during set up of the in-clinic testing, the subject does not have a clear, measurable ECAP (>10uV amplitude obtained consistently and repeatably) they will not move forward with testing or randomization and will be considered a screen failure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted electrical cardiac devices (e.g., pacemaker, defibrillator)
  • Currently enrolled or planning to enroll in an interventional clinical study that could potentially confound the study results (co-enrollment in an interventional study is only allowed when documented pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager or designee)
  • Pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and unwilling to use a medically acceptable form of birth control during the study
  • Has untreated major psychiatric comorbidity, as determined by the investigator or designee
  • Trialed with a permanent implant lead and extension ("buried lead trial")
  • If subject is classified as vulnerable or requires a legally authorized representative (LAR)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Closed-loop testing, then Open-loop testing
Subjects receive Closed-loop testing, then Open-loop testing (Spinal Cord Stimulation - SCS Therapy)
SCS therapy with an external neurostimulator using either open-loop or closed loop algorithm
Experimental: Open-loop (OL) testing, then Closed-loop (CL) testing
Subjects receive Open-loop testing, then Closed-loop testing (Spinal Cord Stimulation - SCS Therapy)
SCS therapy with an external neurostimulator using either open-loop or closed loop algorithm

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Proportion of Subjects With a Reduction in Overstimulation Sensation With SCS Using a Closed-loop Algorithm Compared With SCS in Open-loop
Time Frame: In-clinic testing (1 day)
For every overstimulation sensation brought about by protocol-prescribed activities, subjects will rate the intensity of the sensation using a 5-point Likert scale. The average intensity score during OL and CL periods will be calculated for each subject. If the average intensity score during CL period is less than that from the OL period, the subject is considered as a subject with a reduction in overstimulation sensation during CL vs. OL period. The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with a reduction in overstimulation sensation among subjects who have in-clinic testing.
In-clinic testing (1 day)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MDT19024

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Open-loop testing, Closed-loop testing - External Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)

Subscribe