- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04765735
Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Human Observation Medtronic Algorithm Comparison Study (ECHO-MAC)
February 23, 2024 updated by: MedtronicNeuro
Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Human Observation Medtronic Algorithm Comparison Study (ECHO-MAC)
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind, cross-over, non-significant risk IDE research study to evaluate the in-clinic performance of a closed-loop algorithm in Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) therapy with an ENS device.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This clinical trial information was submitted voluntarily under the applicable law and, therefore, certain submission deadlines may not apply.
(That is, clinical trial information for this non-applicable clinical trial was submitted under section 402(j)(4)(A) of the Public Health Service Act and 42 CFR 11.60 and is not subject to the deadlines established by sections 402(j)(2) and (3) of the Public Health Service Act or 42 CFR 11.24 and 11.44.)
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
52
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Carlsbad, California, United States, 92009
- Coastal Pain and Spinal Diagnostics
-
-
Minnesota
-
Duluth, Minnesota, United States, 55805
- Lakewalk Surgery Center
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55439
- Twin Cities Pain Clinic
-
Edina, Minnesota, United States, 55435
- Nura Research Institute
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43203
- The Ohio State University
-
Kettering, Ohio, United States, 45429
- Kettering Medical Center
-
Mount Orab, Ohio, United States, 45154
- Premier Pain Treatment Institute
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17601
- Center for Interventional Pain and Spine
-
-
South Dakota
-
Watertown, South Dakota, United States, 57201
- Innovative Pain Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
22 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 22 years of age or older
- Candidate for or undergoing Medtronic SCS device trial for labeled indication - Candidate for or undergoing a Medtronic SCS device trial for labeled indication means that a clinical decision has already been made between a physician and the patient to undergo Medtronic SCS trialing to treat the patient's chronic pain. This decision is to be made prior to discussing with the patient whether to enroll in the study
- Willing and able to provide signed and dated informed consent
- Capable of comprehending and consenting in English
- Willing and able to comply with all study procedures and visits
- Clear, measurable ECAP ECAPs - If during set up of the in-clinic testing, the subject does not have a clear, measurable ECAP (>10uV amplitude obtained consistently and repeatably) they will not move forward with testing or randomization and will be considered a screen failure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Implanted electrical cardiac devices (e.g., pacemaker, defibrillator)
- Currently enrolled or planning to enroll in an interventional clinical study that could potentially confound the study results (co-enrollment in an interventional study is only allowed when documented pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager or designee)
- Pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and unwilling to use a medically acceptable form of birth control during the study
- Has untreated major psychiatric comorbidity, as determined by the investigator or designee
- Trialed with a permanent implant lead and extension ("buried lead trial")
- If subject is classified as vulnerable or requires a legally authorized representative (LAR)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Closed-loop testing, then Open-loop testing
Subjects receive Closed-loop testing, then Open-loop testing (Spinal Cord Stimulation - SCS Therapy)
|
SCS therapy with an external neurostimulator using either open-loop or closed loop algorithm
|
|
Experimental: Open-loop (OL) testing, then Closed-loop (CL) testing
Subjects receive Open-loop testing, then Closed-loop testing (Spinal Cord Stimulation - SCS Therapy)
|
SCS therapy with an external neurostimulator using either open-loop or closed loop algorithm
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Proportion of Subjects With a Reduction in Overstimulation Sensation With SCS Using a Closed-loop Algorithm Compared With SCS in Open-loop
Time Frame: In-clinic testing (1 day)
|
For every overstimulation sensation brought about by protocol-prescribed activities, subjects will rate the intensity of the sensation using a 5-point Likert scale.
The average intensity score during OL and CL periods will be calculated for each subject.
If the average intensity score during CL period is less than that from the OL period, the subject is considered as a subject with a reduction in overstimulation sensation during CL vs. OL period.
The primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects with a reduction in overstimulation sensation among subjects who have in-clinic testing.
|
In-clinic testing (1 day)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 23, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 29, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
June 29, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 18, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 19, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
February 21, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 26, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 23, 2024
Last Verified
February 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- MDT19024
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
University Rovira i VirgiliMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación, SpainNot yet recruitingChronic Post-operative Pain | Chronic Postsurgical Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Postoperative PainSpain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Bjorn AngKarolinska Institutet; The Swedish Research Council; Göteborg University; Forte; Dalarna...Not yet recruitingPain Management | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain, WidespreadSweden
-
University of FaisalabadNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade do Vale do ParaíbaCAPES Foundation - Ministry of Education, Brazil.Enrolling by invitationChronic Low Back Pain | Chronic Shoulder Pain | Chronic Knee PainBrazil
-
Washington D.C. Veterans Affairs Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Back Pain | Chronic Pain (back / Neck)United States
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionCompletedPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Connecticut Children's Medical CenterRecruitingChronic Pain | Pain, Chronic | Chronic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...RecruitingJoint Pain | Chronic Knee Pain | Chronic Pain (Back / Neck) | Chronic Pain ManagementUnited States
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
Clinical Trials on Open-loop testing, Closed-loop testing - External Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)
-
Johns Hopkins UniversitySaluda Medical Pty LtdWithdrawnChronic Pain | Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke | Upper Motor Neuron LesionUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingChronic Pelvic Pain SyndromeUnited States
-
Brai²nRecruitingNeurophysiological Sensitivity to Spinal Cord Stimulation | Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) | Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T) Lower SpineBelgium
-
Brai²nRecruitingPersistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2 (PSPS-T2), Lower Spine | Spinal Cord Sensitivity to Neurostimulation | Neurophysiological Sensitivity to Spinal Cord StimulationBelgium
-
University of WashingtonRecruitingMultiple SclerosisUnited States
-
University of OxfordCompletedParkinson DiseaseUnited Kingdom