Implementation of Routine Walking Speed Measurements in Older Veterans

March 30, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Walking Speed as a Vital Sign: Enhancing Function in Older Veterans

Walking speed is a powerful predictor of mortality and adverse health consequences (e.g. fall or hospitalization) in older adults. Knowledge of individuals' walking speed can provide unique insight into current physical function and need for healthcare services. Furthermore, walking speed is a modifiable risk factor such that early recognition of physical function decline allows for appropriate and timely intervention prior to the occurrence of adverse health events. Therefore, this proposal seeks to implement routine measures of walking speed into VHA primary care as a 'vital sign' to routinely monitor Veteran physical function and help guide provider referrals.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Walking speed is a vital sign that can predict mortality and adverse health outcomes in older adults. However, it is not routinely assessed in outpatient primary care clinics, potentially leading to missed opportunities for timely intervention and rehabilitative care. Current literature identifies walking speed as a sensitive measure of overall health and functional status, with a walking speed of <0.6 m/s indicating increased risk of adverse events and reduced independence. Consequently, knowledge of individuals' walking speed can provide unique insight into current physical function and need for healthcare services. Importantly, walking speed is also a modifiable risk factor and is sensitive to change in multiple populations with varying medical conditions, making it an ideal measure for longitudinal monitoring of physical function. The investigators' preliminary work implementing walking speed measurement into outpatient geriatric clinical care, along with recent literature, demonstrates that routine walking speed assessments are feasible, quick, and safe.

Significance: Current VHA standard of care within primary care clinics relies on subjective information to evaluate a Veteran's physical function, which can be unreliable and inaccurate. Implementation of walking speed will introduce an objective measure that can accurately assess how a Veteran's physical function changes over time, thus helping providers identify whether referrals to rehabilitation services are needed.

Innovation and Impact: This proposal is innovative as it will be one of the first studies to assess the implementation and effect of walking speed across multiple primary care clinics. Additionally, examination of contextual factors influencing the implementation and effect of walking speed is innovative and will lead to adaptations that facilitate future widespread implementation.

Methodology: Pragmatic hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation study using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial design to evaluate and improve walking speed implementation and assess its effectiveness across VHA PACT clinics.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

10500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045-7211
        • Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Site Inclusion Criteria:

  • VHA primary care clinics

VHA Personnel Inclusion Criteria:

  • Providers working in a VHA primary care clinic where FASTER is implemented
  • Nursing staff working in a VHA primary care clinic where FASTER is implemented

Veteran Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans 60 years and older receiving care in a VHA primary care clinic where FASTER is implemented

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual care will continue in clinical practice with this phase occurring before FASTER implementation.
During the Usual Care phase, participating clinics will continue with usual care with the addition that walking speed will be measured and recorded. Veterans and providers will be blinded to walking speed measurement so as to not influence care.
Experimental: FASTER
The FASTER intervention includes measurement, recording, and use of walking speed measurement to help guide care in older Veterans.
During the FASTER phase, walking speed will be measured during clinic visits, recorded in the medical record, and used by providers to guide care. An Action Toolkit will be provided with resources for providers to support informed care decisions based on Veterans' walking speeds.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Walking Speed
Time Frame: Change in walking speed before exposure and change in walking speed after exposure to FASTER intervention (up to 12 months).
Time to complete 4-meter walk at usual speed converted to meters per second. Higher speed indicates better function.
Change in walking speed before exposure and change in walking speed after exposure to FASTER intervention (up to 12 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events (Injurious Falls)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Falls that result in a medical visit
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Adverse Events (Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Emergency department visits and hospitalizations
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RE-AIM Component: Reach
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Proportion of visits with a walking speed measured out of all in-person primary care visits (Veterans ≥65 years of age)
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
RE-AIM Component: Adoption (Providers)
Time Frame: Start of implementation.
Proportion of providers that state they will use walking speed information
Start of implementation.
RE-AIM Component: Adoption (Assessors)
Time Frame: Start of usual care.
Proportion of assessors that state they will measure walking speed
Start of usual care.
RE-AIM Component: Adoption (Clinics)
Time Frame: Start of usual care.
Proportion of clinics that state they will implement walking speed
Start of usual care.
RE-AIM Component: Implementation (Walking Speed Measurement)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Proportion of completed walking speed measurement elements out of all elements
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
RE-AIM Component: Implementation (Walking Speed Initiative Elements)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Proportion of completed walking speed initiative elements out of all intervention elements
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
RE-AIM Component: Implementation (Walking Speed Measurement Total Time)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Time to complete walking speed measurement and documentation
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
RE-AIM Component: Implementation (Walking Speed Measurement Relative Time)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Time to complete walking speed measurement relative to total rooming procedures
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
RE-AIM Component: Maintenance (Walking Speed Measurement)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after Implementation phase.
Proportion of completed walking speed measurement elements out of all elements
Up to 6 months after Implementation phase.
RE-AIM Component: Maintenance (Walking Speed Initiative Elements)
Time Frame: Up to 6 months after Implementation phase.
Proportion of completed walking speed initiative elements out of all intervention elements
Up to 6 months after Implementation phase.
Referrals (Physical Therapy/Gerofit)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Change in VHA referrals to physical therapy/Gerofit
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Referrals (Follow-Through)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Proportion of referrals that result in follow-through
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Referrals (Recommendations)
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Count of recommendations for community exercise programs, home exercise, physical activity promotion
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Adaptations
Time Frame: Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).
Number and type of adaptations at each VHA primary care clinical site
Start of usual care to end of implementation (anticipated 24 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer E. Stevens-Lapsley, PhD, Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center, Aurora, CO

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSR6-009-24S
  • I01HX003877 (Other Grant/Funding Number: VA Office of Research and Development)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The research team intends to share study data that may be requested from other research investigators in a data-sharing agreement provided at the study end. Data prepared for distribution under a data-sharing agreement will be further redacted to ensure privacy of study participant identity yet allow analyses to occur by other investigators. The data-sharing agreement will include requirements to protect participants' privacy and data confidentiality. All participants will be de-identified using a coded participant ID to maintain confidentiality and will not be individually identifiable by name.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available starting 6 months after primary study publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be made available upon reasonable written request to the study team. The PI, Dr. Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley will review requests.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

Subscribe