Comparison of Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Neoadjuvant Therapy for TNBC

Analysis of the Efficacy and Influencing Factors of Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

This study is an observational study that retrospectively collects data of triple-negative breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. It compares the bpCR rate, apCR rate, and tpCR rate of patients treated with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, in order to analyze the efficacy and influencing factors of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Breast cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors in women, with a rapidly increasing incidence rate and mortality rate globally. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) refers to a type of breast cancer that lacks amplification of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), accounting for approximately 15% to 20% of all breast cancer types. It is characterized by high aggressiveness, rapid recurrence and metastasis, difficult treatment, and high mortality rate. The main treatment methods for TNBC include chemotherapy, surgery, and neoadjuvant therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy is an important component of TNBC treatment, which can rapidly control tumor burden, reduce the risk of distant metastasis, increase surgical opportunities, and facilitate preoperative assessment of tumor response to drugs, thereby evaluating the effectiveness of treatment regimens and guiding the selection of postoperative treatment plans. Currently, the standard neoadjuvant therapy regimen for TNBC is based on chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

In recent years, the application of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer has gained increasing attention. Based on the phase III clinical study KEYNOTE-522, the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab has been approved for neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of triple-negative breast cancer.

Preliminary data from the KEYNOTE-522 study indicate that, in neoadjuvant therapy, the combination of pembrolizumab significantly improves the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate compared to chemotherapy alone. The study results suggest that immunotherapy has advantages in improving the prognosis of triple-negative breast cancer.

This study retrospectively collected data on triple-negative breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, including complete data on diagnosis age, clinical tumor stage, clinical lymph node stage, Ki-67 level, HER-2 expression, surgical method after neoadjuvant therapy, and postoperative pathology. The study categorized neoadjuvant efficacy into breast pathological complete response, axillary pathological complete response, and overall pathological complete response. It compared and analyzed the bpCR rate, apCR rate, and tpCR rate of patients with different clinical characteristics to evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the influencing factors of neoadjuvant efficacy. Additionally, this study established a set of subgroup analyses to explore the efficacy and influencing factors of albumin-bound paclitaxel weekly therapy and three-week therapy in immunotherapy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

201

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

TNBC patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1)The patient is aged ≥18 years;(2) Both the biopsy pathology and postoperative pathology confirm the diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer; (3) The patient has undergone complete neoadjuvant therapy; (4) After neoadjuvant therapy, the patient underwent surgical treatment and has complete postoperative pathology results; (5) The patient's basic information is complete.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Bilateral breast cancer or distant metastasis; (2) History of previous malignant tumor or chemotherapy/immunotherapy; (3) Required NST not completed or no surgical treatment after NST; (4) Lack of pathological evaluation results for biopsy specimens or postoperative specimens, or postoperative pathological results not being triple negative; (5) Unable to obtain characteristic patient information, such as age and tumor stage. (6) Change in regimen during neoadjuvant therapy; (7) Lost to follow-up patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Chemotherapy group
Patients with triple-negative breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Immunotherapy group
Patients with triple-negative breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pathological complete response rate
Time Frame: 1 year
The proportion of patients who achieved pathological complete response after undergoing complete neoadjuvant therapy and subsequent surgery
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jue Wang, The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on TNBC, Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Subscribe