- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07524361
Taekwondo Program for Preventing Falls in Older Adults
April 6, 2026 updated by: Chih-Hsiang Yang, University of South Carolina
Evaluating a Taekwondo-based Fall Prevention Exercise Program in Older Adults: a Feasibility Study
Falls in older adults are a public health crisis, as 30% of older adults fall each year, with a mortality rate of 78%.1 Fall-related healthcare costs are over 50 billion dollars.1 Therefore, preventing older adults from falling is important in both individual and public health aspects by increasing their quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.
However, the current fall-prevention exercise programs have a limitation in maintaining exercise adherence behaviors or increasing physical activities once the intervention is completed.2
The theory-based exercise program shows a higher adherence and retention rate.3,4
Taekwondo (TKD), one type of martial arts, can be a potential channel to deliver a theory-based fall prevention exercise program.
Therefore, this study aims to test the feasibility of the potential 12 Taekwondo-based fall prevention exercise program for older adults and its preliminary efficacy using a randomized controlled trial.
Study Overview
Status
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
20
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
South Carolina
-
Columbia, South Carolina, United States, 29201
- University of South Carolina
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older adults ages 55 and above
- Adequate physical ability to perform walking independently
- Able to use a smartphone app without assistance
- Capable of providing informed consent
- Agree to be randomized to the group
Exclusion Criteria:
- Plan to have surgery or relocate outside the area within the next 3 months
- Currently participate in other studies involving physical activity or fall-prevention research studies
- Frail older adults screened by the FRAIL questionnaire
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Taekwondo exercise arm
Participants will received 12 sessions of Taekwondo-based fall prevention exercises.
The exercise will be delivered twice a week for 6-weeks at the local recreational center.
Each sessions includes three components: static and dynamic stretching warm-up, basic Taekwondo movement exercises, and kicking exercises.
Static and dynamic warm-up was developed based on the evidence-based fall prevention exercise, The Otago Exercise Program.
The basic Taekwondo movement exercises include three basic stances (walking, front, and horse riding stances) , and hand movements (low, middle, and high block, and middle punch).
Kicking exercise includes target kicking using front kicks.
|
Current fall-prevention exercise programs have a limitation in maintaining exercise adherence behaviors or increasing physical activities once the intervention is completed.2
The theory-based exercise program shows a higher adherence and retention rate.3,4
Taekwondo (TKD), one type of martial arts, can be a potential channel to deliver a theory-based fall prevention exercise program.
Therefore, this study aims to test the feasibility of the potential 12 Taekwondo-based fall prevention exercise program for older adults and its preliminary efficacy using RCT.
|
|
Active Comparator: Fall prevention education arm
Participants will received the Live Strong and Safe Program on Fall Prevention online education program.
It includes three modules.
Module1 has three sessions that providing overview of fall prevention such as fall statistics, and preventable risk factors.
Module2 has eight sessions that provides tips to ensure home safety for fall prevention.
Module3 has 12 sessions that provides tips for personal safety from nutrition to mental health.
Participants will complete this module at their own pace, and report their progress through email or text message each week.
|
Live Strong and Safe Program on Fall Prevention online education includes three modules.
Module1 has three sessions that provide overview of fall prevention such as fall statistics, and preventable risk factors.
Module2 has eight sessions that provide tips to ensure the home safety for fall prevention.
Module3 has 12 sessions that provide tips for personal safety from nutrition to mental health.
Participants will complete this module at their own pace, and report their progress through email or text message each week.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Feasibility
Time Frame: Post-intervention at week 7.
|
The number of participants enrolled in the study per month; The number of participants who provided consent over the eligible participants.
|
Post-intervention at week 7.
|
|
Intervention Satisfaction
Time Frame: Post intervention at week 7
|
8-item questionnaire with 7-point Likert (adapted from Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale).
The response scale ranges from 1-7, spanning from the lowest degree (=1) to the highest degree (=7).
|
Post intervention at week 7
|
|
Perceived feasibility
Time Frame: Post intervention at week 7
|
Using 5 points Likert Scale, and the response scale is (1): Completely disagree; (3) Neither agree or disagree; to (5): Completely agree.
These items ask about participants' perceived program acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility
|
Post intervention at week 7
|
|
Intervention fidelity
Time Frame: Every exercise session
|
Fidelity checklist scored by the independent rater
|
Every exercise session
|
|
Adherence rate
Time Frame: Post intervention (At Week 7)
|
Number of sessions each participant attended / total sessions provided (i.e., 12)
|
Post intervention (At Week 7)
|
|
Intention to reparticipate
Time Frame: Post intervention (At Week 7)
|
Use 4-item questionnaire with 5-point Likert Scale.
The response scale is (1): Strongly disagree; (3) Neither agree or disagree, to Maximum (5): Strongly agree
|
Post intervention (At Week 7)
|
|
Adverse event
Time Frame: Anytime during the intervention period
|
The number of grade 1 adverse events occurred across all exercise sessions.
|
Anytime during the intervention period
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical function
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 7)
|
Static and dynamic balance: Balance Error Scoring System (Outcome unit: number of errors occurred) Functional Gait Assessment (Outcome unit: a score ranging from 0-30) Muscle strength: 30-second chair-stand tests (Outcome unit: number of successful trials) Gait speed: Timed-Up and Go (Outcome unit: total time (seconds) to complete the task)
|
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 7)
|
|
Fear of falling
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 7)
|
The Falls Efficacy Scale-International - 16 items with 4-point Likert Scale ranging from (1): Not at all concerned to (4): Very concerned.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 7)
|
|
Activity and Sedentary fragmentation
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 7)
|
Activity fragmentation: Transition probability from activity behavior to sedentary behavior every minute.
Sedentary fragmentation: Transition probability from sedentary behavior to activity behavior every minute.
|
Baseline (Week 0) and post-intervention (Week 7)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Chih-Hsiang Yang, PhD, 2. University of South Carolina
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L, Michie S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2010 Feb 17;12(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1376.
- Florence CS, Bergen G, Atherly A, Burns E, Stevens J, Drake C. Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):693-698. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15304. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
- Judy A. Stevens, Elizabeth R. Burns. A CDC Compendium of Effective Fall Interventions: What Works for Community-Dwelling Older Adults. 3rd Ed. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2015.
- Prestwich A, Sniehotta FF, Whittington C, Dombrowski SU, Rogers L, Michie S. Does theory influence the effectiveness of health behavior interventions? Meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2014 May;33(5):465-74. doi: 10.1037/a0032853. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 13, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 6, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
April 13, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 13, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 6, 2026
Last Verified
April 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00137158
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
The study will be conducted from a restricted area and the participants will be recruited from local senior centers, which has high risk of identifying the personal information of study participants.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Taekwondo-based Fall Prevention Exercise Condition
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedElderly | Fall Prevention | Fall Risk | Home Based CareTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Heidelberg UniversityGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research; University of Ulm; Universitätsklinikum... and other collaboratorsCompletedExercise | Fall PreventionGermany
-
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman UniversityNot yet recruitingExercise | Geriatrics | Balance | Fall Prevention
-
Foundation University IslamabadCompletedAged | Muscle Strength | Resistance Training | Postural Balance | Exercise Therapy | Fall PreventionPakistan
-
Foundation University IslamabadActive, not recruitingAged | Cognition | Muscle Strength | Postural Balance | Exercise Therapy | Fall Prevention | PosturePakistan
-
University of ThessalyCompletedFunctionality, Falls, Elderly, Fall Prevention, Exercise Elderly, Assessment, Rehabilitation, Community-DwellingGreece
-
University of OldenburgUniversity of Ulm; University of Konstanz; Marienhospital Herne; Heidelberg University... and other collaboratorsRecruitingCognitive Impairment | Exercise | Geriatrics | Fall Prevention | PerturbationGermany
-
University of Southern QueenslandThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityCompletedMild Cognitive Impairment | Exercise Training | Virtual Reality | Fall PreventionHong Kong
-
Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and WelfareCompletedPhysical Function | Postmenopausal Osteoporosis | Fall Prevention | Agility Exercise | Balance StabilityTaiwan
Clinical Trials on Fall prevention exercise using Taekwondo
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Institut... and other collaboratorsCompletedFractures | Accidental Falls | Fall-related InjuriesFrance
-
Aveiro UniversityCentro de Saúde de AnadiaCompleted
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalMassachusetts General Hospital; Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; North Shore Medical...Completed
-
University of ThessalyCompletedFunctionality, Falls, Elderly, Fall Prevention, Exercise Elderly, Assessment, Rehabilitation, Community-DwellingGreece
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentRecruitingObesity | Sarcopenia | FallsUnited States
-
Universidad Católica del MauleUniversidad Católica del Maule (UCM, Chile)CompletedOlder People | Sports | Martial ArtsChile
-
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityCompleted
-
Betul Esra CevikCompletedAccidental Fall | Fall Prevention | Fall Risk FactorsTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and PreventionSouthern Medical University, ChinaNot yet recruitingOlder Adults | Accidental Falls
-
New York UniversityCompleted