Virtual Reality Activity-based Training for Preventing Falls for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)

July 24, 2023 updated by: University of Southern Queensland

Virtual Reality Activity-based Training for Preventing Falls Among Community-dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial Study

Using a Virtual Reality (VR) games-based application is as an innovative falls prevention technology in an aged care service. The VR intervention has promising effects on improving the physical and balance performances in the older adults.The study explored and evaluated the effects of VR activity-based training on falls prevention among community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A pilot randomized control trial study was applied to compare the effects on falls prevention between participants who experienced a full-immersive VR training and group-based exercise (Baduanjin) training. Eighteen participants were recruited from ausing convenience sampling and were randomly assigned into the VR group and the exercise group (non-VR). The participants in both wo groups' participants attended 16 falls prevention training sessions over eight weeks. Eligible participants identified with a higher risk of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia undertook three measurements, pretest (T1), post-test (T2) and follow up (T3). The primary outcomes assessed included changes in physical risks factor of falls, and the secondary outcomes assessed included changes in cognition and fall efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • China
      • Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, 0000
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, St. James Settlement Hong Kong, Salvation Army Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. aged 65 years to 85 years inclusive;
  2. had a history of a fall within the past 2 years;
  3. community-dwelling older adults;
  4. at a higher risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia, assessed by a validated screening tool of Hong Kong Montreal Cognitive assessment test (HK-MoCA score=21/22);
  5. walk independently e.g. able to access publicly - VR research center centre or local community aged care facilities.

Exclusion Criteria:

if they had a medical diagnosis of unstable health conditions

  1. dizziness;
  2. Meniere's disease;
  3. Epilepsy;
  4. Parkinson's disease;
  5. Severe hearing impairment and visual impairments;
  6. Mental illness.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VR group
VR activity-based training
VR games activities were chosen for simulated cognitive-motor training in the VR group. The VR training modules for this study included fire drill, walking exercise, balancing game activities and community shopping practices. These training modules involved dual task components; the participant was expected to train up his/her physical and cognitive motor performances in an 8-week VR activity-based program. VR group participants received 2-sessions per week, 16 training sessions in total.
Active Comparator: Exercise group
Exercise-based training (Baduanjin)
The exercise group used a traditional Chinese Qigong Baduanjin exercise incorporating with a fall prevention education strategy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg balance test (BBS) - change is being assessed
Time Frame: At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
To test the balance performance and assess the fall risk. Total score is 56 ( score below 51 indicated predictive of fall risk)
At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
Time up and go test (TUG) - change is being assessed
Time Frame: At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
To assess functional mobility and assess the fall risk. Score over 12 seconds indicates higher risk of fall for the older adults
At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
Six minutes walk test (6MWT) - change is being assessed
Time Frame: At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
To assess the walking speed and performance. Walking distance within 6 minutes measured the length (m/metre)
At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive status assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale- change is being assessed
Time Frame: At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
To assess the cognitive level. Total score 30 ( score if less than 22 indicated higher risk of midl cognitive impairment
At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
Executive functioning tests by Trail making test A and test B *TMTA/B) - change is being assessed
Time Frame: At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
To assess the level of executive functions. It indicated the time of completion (second)
At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
Fall efficacy by fall efficacy international scale (FESI) - change is being assessed
Time Frame: At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up
To assess the level of fear concern. Totoal score is 64 (score lower than 27 indicated less fear concern
At prettest, postest (up to 8 weeks) and post 3 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: WING KEUNG IP, University of Southern Queensland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • USQ AEC H21REA071

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No permission from participants

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Cognitive Impairment

Clinical Trials on VR activity-based

Subscribe